Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from Hedonia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Conceptual and Operational Definitions

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in eudaimonia (e.g., growth, meaning, authenticity, excellence) and its distinction from hedonia (e.g., pleasure, enjoyment, comfort, absence of distress) is growing rapidly, as researchers recognize that both concepts are central to the study of well-being. Yet research on these concepts faces challenges as well: findings based on different operationalizations can be quite discrepant; definitions of eudaimonia and hedonia sometimes fall into different categories of analysis (e.g. when eudaimonia is described as a way of functioning, hedonia as an experience); and the terms eudaimonia and hedonia are sometimes defined vaguely or applied to concepts that may be mere correlates. To aid in addressing these challenges, we propose the following terminology and classification for discussing conceptual and operational definitions: (1) degree of centrality—differentiating concepts that are core (i.e., definitional), close-to-core (i.e., given some attention but not central), and major correlates; (2) category of analysis—identifying which of the following categories a definition represents: (a) orientations (orientations, values, motives, and goals), (b) behaviors (behavioral content, activity characteristics), (c) experiences (subjective experiences, emotions, cognitive appraisals), (d) functioning (indices of positive psychological functioning, mental health, flourishing); and (3) level of measurement—identifying whether a definition is used for trait and/or state comparisons. The work of scholars with a program of research on eudaimonia or the distinction between eudaimonia and hedonia is reviewed and discussed within the framework of the proposed classification; several points of convergence and divergence across definitions are highlighted; and important questions and directions for future research are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annas, J. (1993). The morality of happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (4th Century B.C.E./1985). Nicomachean ethics.(T. Irwin, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

  • Arneson R (2007). Desire formation and human good. In Olsaretti, S. (Ed.) Preferences and well-being. Royal Institute of Philosophy, supp. vol. 59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–32.

  • Bauer, J. J. (2008). How the ego quiets as it grows: Ego development, growth stories, and eudaimonic personality development. In H. A. Wayment & J. J. Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 199–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. J., & McAdams, D. P. (2004a). Personal growth in adults’ stories of life transitions. Journal of Personality, 72, 573–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. J., & McAdams, D. P. (2004b). Growth goals, maturity, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 40, 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. J., & McAdams, D. P. (2010). Eudaimonic growth: Narrative growth goals predict increases in ego development and subjective well-being 3 years later. Developmental Psychology, 46, 761–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. J., McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2008). Narrative identity and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. J., McAdams, D. P., & Sakaeda, A. R. (2005). Interpreting the good life: Growth memories in the lives of mature, happy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. J., & Park, S. W. (2010). Growth is not just for the young: Growth narratives, eudaimonic resilience, and the aging self. In P. S. Fry & C. L. M. Keyes (Eds.), New frontiers in resilient aging: Life-strengths and well-being in late life (pp. 60–89). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. J., Schwab, J. R., & McAdams, D. P. (2011). Self-actualizing: Where ego development finally feels good? The Humanistic Psychologist, 39, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1781). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Accessible online at http://www.utilitarianism.com/jeremy-bentham/index.html.

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, W. C., Smith, M. L., Cornish, K. A., & Qualls, D. L. (1996). Factor structure of mental health measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 406–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A. (2009). Optimal experience and meaning: Which relationship? Psychological Topics, Special Issue on Positive Psychology, 18, 285–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2000). The quality of experience in adolescents’ daily lives: Developmental perspectives. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 347–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Bassi, M. (2009). Sharing optimal experiences and promoting good community life in a multicultural society. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011a). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100, 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988). Modernization and the changing context of flow in work and leisure. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 193–213). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2004a). Bringing subjectivity into focus: Optimal experiences, life themes, and person-centered rehabilitation. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 581–597). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2004b). Parenthood and the quality of experience in daily life: A longitudinal study. Social Indicators Research, 67, 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The investigation of optimal experience and apathy: Developmental and psychosocial implications. European Psychologist, 10, 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011b). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Social empowerment through personal growth. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness, and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. J. (2001). The limits of a technical concept of a good marriage: Exploring the role of virtue in communication skills. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. J. (2005). Virtue and psychology: Pursuing excellence in ordinary practices. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. J. (2008). From continence to virtue: Recovering goodness, character unity, and character types for positive psychology. Theory and Psychology, 18, 629–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. J. (2012a). An Aristotelian framework for the human good. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32, 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. J. (2012b). Placing virtue and the human good in psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. J., Molica, C. O., & Procacci, E. N. (2010). Constitutive and instrumental goal orientations and their relations with eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowers, B. J., & Richardson, F. C. (1996). Why is multiculturalism good? American Psychologist, 51, 609–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E.M., & Ryff, C.D. (2012a). Living well with medical comorbidities: A biopsychosocial perspective. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr152.

  • Friedman, E. M., & Ryff, C. D. (2012b). A biopsychosocial approach to positive aging. Journal of Gerontology, 6, 535–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality, 77, 1025–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gert, B. (1998). Morality: Its nature and justification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannopoulos, V. L., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2011). Effects of positive interventions and orientations to happiness on subjective well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1986). Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grouzet, F. M. E., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Dols, J. M. F., Kim, Y., Lau, S., et al. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 800–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. J., Fowers, B. J., Carroll, J. S., & Yang, C. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring marital virtues. In S. L. Hofferth & L. M. Casper (Eds.), Handbook of measurement issues in family research (pp. 67–83). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haybron, D. (2008). Happiness, the self and human flourishing. Utilitas, 20, 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathwood, C. (2006). Desire-satisfactionism and hedonism. Philosophical Studies, 128, 539–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V. (2012). Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: Parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V. (2013a). Eudaimonia and hedonia: Their complementary roles in life, and how they can be pursued in practice. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Positive Psychology in Practice, Second Edition. Manuscript accepted with minor revisions.

  • Huta, V. (2013b). Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: Distinctions, similarities, and relationships. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 139–158). Washington, DC: APA Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V. (2013c). Eudaimonia. In S. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 201–213). Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V., Pelletier, L., Baxter, D., & Thompson, A. (2012). How eudaimonic and hedonic motives relate to the well-being of close others. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hy, L. X., & Loevinger, J. (1996). Measuring ego development (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Subjective well-being in mental health and human development research worldwide: An introduction. Social Indicators Research, 77, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Myers, J. M., & Kendler, K. S. (2010). The structure of the genetic and environmental influences on mental well-being. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2379–2384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., & Simoes, E. J. (2012). To flourish or not: Positive mental health and all-cause morality. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2164–2172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopperud, K. H., & Vitterso, J. (2008). Distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Results from a day reconstruction study among Norwegian jobholders. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (1979). Two conceptions of happiness. Philosophical Review, 88, 167–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2007). What is good and why: The ethics of well-being. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York, NY: Van Norstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1969). Love and will. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 494–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1861/1979). Utilitarianism. In Sher, G. (ed). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

  • Morozink, J. A., Friedman, E. M., Coe, C. L., & Ryff, C. D. (2010, October 18). Socioeconomic and psychosocial predictors of Interleukin-6 in the MIDUS National Sample. Health Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0021360.

  • Nix, G., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: the effects of autonomous versus controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 266–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, D. L. (1976). Personal destinies: A philosophy of ethical individualism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palys, T. S., & Little, B. R. (1983). Perceived life satisfaction and the organization of personal projects systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1221–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Ruch, W. (2009). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction in twenty-seven nations. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robitschek, C., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). Keyes’s model of mental health with personal growth initiative as a parsimonious predictor. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Chirkov, V. I., Little, T. D., Sheldon, K. M., Timoshina, E., & Deci, E. L. (1999). The American Dream in Russia: Extrinsic aspirations and well-being in two cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1509–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Curren, R. R., & Deci, E. L. (2013). What humans need: Flourishing in Aristotelian philosophy and self-determination theory. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 57–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Huta, V. (2009). Wellness as healthy functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 202–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (2013). Eudaimonic well-being and health: Mapping consequences of self-realization. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 77–98). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., Lees, Y. H., Essex, M. J., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). My children and me: Midlife evaluations of grown children and of self. Psychology and Aging, 9, 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., Singer, B. H., & Love, G. D. (2004). Positive health: Connecting well-being with biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B Biological Sciences, 359, 1383–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. J., Waterman, A. S., Vazsonyi, A. T., Zamboanga, B. L., Whitbourne, S. K., Weisskirch, R. S., et al. (2011). The association of well-being with health risk behaviors in college- attending young adults. Applied Developmental Science, 15, 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 531–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., & Shin, J. Y. (2012). Happiness and meaning in a technological age: A psychological approach. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & E. Spence (Eds.), The good life in a technological age (pp. 92–108). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Shin, J.-Y., Shim, Y., & Fitch-Martin, A. (2013). Is meaning in life a flagship indicator of well-being? In A. Waterman (Ed.), Eudaimonia (pp. 159–182). Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straume, L. V., & Vittersø, J. (2012). Happiness, inspiration and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the work place. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 387–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, L. (1996). Welfare, happiness and ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, V. (2013). Recipies of a good life: Eudaimonism and the contribution of philosophy. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 19–38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, V., & Hall, A. (2010). Normative theory and psychological research: Hedonism, eudaimonism and why it matters. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 212–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vella-Brodrick, D. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Three ways to be happy: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning—Findings from Australian and US samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J. (2001). Flow versus life satisfaction: A projective use of cartoons to illustrate the difference between the evaluation approach and the intrinsic motivation approach to subjective quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 141–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J. (2003). Flow versus life satisfaction: A projective use of cartoons to illustrate the difference between the evaluation approach and the intrinsic motivation approach to subjective quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 141–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J. (2004). Subjective well-being versus self-actualization: Using the flow-simplex to promote a conceptual, clarification of subjective quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 65, 299–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J. (2013a). Feelings, meanings, and optimal functioning: Some distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 39–55). Washington, DC: APA Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J. (2013b). Functional well-being: Happiness as feelings, evaluations and functioning. In I. Boniwell, S. David, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 227–244). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J., Dyrdal, G.M., & Røysamb, E. (June, 2005). Utilities and capabilities: A psychological account of the two concepts and their relations to the idea of a good life. Paper presented at Workshop on Capabilities and Happiness, Bicocca, Italy.

  • Vittersø, J., Oelmann, H. I., & Wang, A. L. (2009a). Life satisfaction is not a balanced estimator of the good life: evidence from reaction-time measures and self-reported emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J., Overwein, P., & Martinsen, E. (2009b). Pleasure and interest are differentially affected by replaying versus analyzing a happy life moment. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J., & Søholt, Y. (2011). Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and personal growth goes with interest: Further arguments for separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 326–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J., Søholt, Y., Hetland, A., Thoresen, I. A., & Røysamb, E. (2010). Was Hercules happy? Some answers from a functional model of human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 95, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J., Vorkinn, M., & Vistad, O. I. (2001). Congruence between recreational mode and actual behavior—A prerequisite for optimal experiences? Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1981). Individualism and interdependence. American Psychologist, 36, 762–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1984). The psychology of individualism. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (2007). Doing well: The relationship of identity status to three conceptions of well-being. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 7, 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (2011). Eudaimonic identity theory: Identity as self-discovery. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (Vols 1 and 2). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Hardy, S. A. Kim, S. Y., Lee, R. M., Armenta, B. E. (2012). Good choices, poor choices: Relationship between the quality of identity commitments and psychosocial functioning. Emerging Adulthood.

  • Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Agocha, V. B., et al. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff, G. J., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2010). Mental illness and mental health: The two continua model across the lifespan. Journal of Adult Development, 17, 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada

    Veronika Huta

  2. The College of New Jersey, P.O. Box 105, Roxbury, VT, 05669, USA

    Alan S. Waterman

Authors
  1. Veronika Huta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan S. Waterman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Veronika Huta or Alan S. Waterman.

Additional information

Veronika Huta and Alan S. Waterman have contribution equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huta, V., Waterman, A.S. Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from Hedonia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Conceptual and Operational Definitions. J Happiness Stud 15, 1425–1456 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation