Abstract
Urban morphology plays a significant role in shaping the spatial distribution of crime. This study takes an environmental criminology perspective on crime and examines how residential burglary is related to two typical morphology features—housing density and composition, which were rarely concerned by previous research. Wuhan, the largest city in central China, was selected as the case study. We first applied a new urban morphology approach to identify the morphology category of each neighborhood based on its housing density and composition. Negative binomial regression models were adopted to evaluate the impacts of morphology factors on the residential burglary at the neighborhood level while controlling for socio-demographic features, transport facilities, housing price and age. Results suggest that both housing composition and density are significantly associated with residential burglary. In particular, one unit increase in Floor Space Index, an indicator of housing density and Ground Space Index, an indicator of housing composition could lead to an 11.9% and 9.1% increase in the incident rate of residential burglary. The ‘block’ and ‘strip’ composition exert more substantial impacts than ‘point’ composition; neighborhoods with ‘high’ and ‘medium’ residences tend to be more dangerous than neighborhoods with ‘low’ residences. Results of this study reveal that communities must be designed with the relationship between risk levels of residential burglary and the ways by which communities are designed in mind. Implications regarding burglary prevention and neighborhood planning practices are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Afon, A. O., & Badiora, A. I. (2018). The dynamics of crime opportunities: Evidences from weather conditions and spatial pattern of residential neighborhood in Ibadan, Nigeria. Papers in Applied Geography, 4(1), 1–20.
Beaton, A. E. (1975). The influence of education and ability on salary and attitudes. In F. Juster (Ed.), Education, income, and human behavior (pp. 365–396). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Berghauser Pont, M., & Haupt, P. (2007). The relation between urban form and density. Urban Morphology, 11(1), 62.
Berghauser Pont, M. Y., & Haupt, P. A. (2009). Space, density and urban form. TU Delft: Delft University of Technology.
Bernasco, W., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). How do residential burglars select target areas? The British Journal of Criminology, 45(3), 296–315.
Birks, D., & Davies, T. (2017). Street network structure and crime risk: An agent-based investigation of the encounter and enclosure hypotheses. Criminology, 55(4), 900–937.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1998). Environmental criminology: From theory to urban planning practice. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 7(1), 31–60.
Cantor, D., & Land, K. C. (1985). Unemployment and crime rates in the Post-World War II United States: A theoretical and empirical analysis. American Sociological Review, 50(3), 317–332.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
Cozens, P. M. (2008). New urbanism, crime and the suburbs: A review of the evidence. Urban Policy and Research, 26(4), 429–444.
Cozens, P. M., Saville, G., & Hillier, D. (2005). Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): A review and modern bibliography. Property Management, 23(5), 328–356.
Crowe, T. D. (2000). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Davies, T., & Johnson, S. D. (2015). Examining the relationship between road structure and burglary risk via quantitative network analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3), 481–507.
Ekblom, P. (2011). Deconstructing CPTED… and reconstructing it for practice, knowledge management and research. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 17(1), 7–28.
Fallon, K. F., & Price, C. R. (2020). Evaluating exposure to crime among LIHTC building types and characteristics in Ohio. Housing Policy Debate, AHEAD-OF-PRINT, 1–17.
Gao, S., Wang, Y., Gao, Y., & Liu, Y. (2013). Understanding urban traffic-flow characteristics: A rethinking of betweenness centrality. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(1), 135–153.
Hillier, B., & Sahbaz, O. (2008). An evidence based approach to crime and urban design or, can we have vitality, sustainability and security all at once?. In R. Cooper, C. Boyko, G. Evans, & M. Adams (Eds.), Urban Sustainability for the 24 Hour City. London: Routledge.
Hipp, J. R., Kim, Y. A., & Kane, K. (2018). The effect of the physical environment on crime rates: Capturing housing age and housing type at varying spatial scales. Crime & Delinquency, 65(11), 1570–1595.
Hirschfield, A., Newton, A., & Rogerson, M. (2010). Linking burglary and target hardening at the property level: New insights into victimization and burglary protection. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21(3), 319–337.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Johnson, S. D., Bernasco, W., Bowers, K. J., Elffers, H., Ratcliffe, J., Rengert, G., & Townsley, M. (2007). Space–time patterns of risk: A cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(3), 201–219.
Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2010). Permeability and burglary risk: Are cul-de-sacs safer? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 89–111.
Kitchen, T., & Schneider, R. H. (2007). Crime prevention and the built environment. Abingdon: Routledge.
Langton, S. H., & Steenbeek, W. (2017). Residential burglary target selection: An analysis at the property-level using Google Street View. Applied Geography, 86, 292–299.
Larkham, P. J., & Jones, A. N. (1991). A glossary of urban form. London: Institute of British Geographers.
Liu, L., Jiang, C., Zhou, S., Liu, K., & Du, F. (2017). Impact of public bus system on spatial burglary patterns in a Chinese urban context. Applied Geography, 89, 142–149.
Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China. (2005). Code for design of civil buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
Montoya, L., Junger, M., & Ongena, Y. (2016). The relation between residential property and its surroundings and day- and night-time residential burglary. Environment and Behavior, 48(4), 515–549.
Nee, C., & Meenaghan, A. (2006). Expert decision making in burglars. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 935–949.
Nee, C., & Taylor, M. (2000). Examining burglars’ target selection: Interview, experiment or ethnomethodology? Psychology, Crime & Law, 6(1), 45–59.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York: Macmillan.
Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. D. (2001). Theoretical and empirical work on the relationship between unemployment and crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17(4), 391–407.
Peeters, M. P., Van Daele, S., & Vander Beken, T. (2018). Adding to the mix: A multilevel analysis of residential burglary. Security Journal, 31(2), 389–409.
Popkin, S., Rich, M., Hendey, L., Parilla, J., & Galster, G. (2012). Public housing transformation and crime: making the case for responsible relocation. Cityscape, 14(3), 137–160.
Sohn, D. W. (2016). Residential crimes and neighbourhood built environment: Assessing the effectiveness of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Cities, 52, 86–93.
Sohn, D. W., Yoon, D. K., & Lee, J. (2018). The impact of neighborhood permeability on residential burglary risk: A case study in Seattle, USA. Cities, 82, 27–34.
Spickard, J. V. (1998). Rethinking religious social action: What is “rational” about rational-choice theory? Sociology of Religion, 59(2), 99–115.
Talen, E. (2013). Charter of the new urbanism. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
Townsley, M., Reid, S., Reynald, D., Rynne, J., & Hutchins, B. (2014). Risky facilities: Analysis of crime concentration in high-rise buildings. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 476, 1–7.
Vandeviver, C., Neutens, T., van Daele, S., Geurts, D., & Beken, V., T (2015). A discrete spatial choice model of burglary target selection at the house-level. Applied Geography, 64, 24–34.
Vilalta, C. J., Sanchez, T., & Fondevila, G. (2021). The impact of city block type on residential burglary: Mexico City as case study. Crime, Law and Social Change, 75(1), 73–88.
White, G. F. (1990). Neighborhood permeability and burglary rates. Justice Quarterly, 7(1), 57–67.
Wu, L., Liu, X., Ye, X., Leipnik, M., Lee, J., & Zhu, X. (2015). Permeability, space syntax, and the patterning of residential burglaries in urban China. Applied Geography, 60, 261–265.
Wuhan Statistics Bureau. (2016). Wuhan statistical yearbook-2015. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
Ye, Y., Li, D., & Liu, X. (2018). How block density and typology affect urban vitality: An exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China. Urban Geography, 39(4), 631–652.
Yue, H., & Zhu, X. (2021). The influence of urban built environment on residential burglary in China: Testing the encounter and enclosure hypotheses. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 21(4), 508–528.
Yue, H., Zhu, X., Ye, X., Hu, T., & Kudva, S. (2018). Modelling the effects of street permeability on burglary in Wuhan, China. Applied Geography, 98, 177–183.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Open Fund of State Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University (Grant No. 21I02), and the Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41961062), Key Research & Development Program of Guangxi Provence (2019AB16010), and Program of Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (2018JJA150089), and National College Students’ innovation and entrepreneurship training program (S202110603170).
Funding
This research was funded by the Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41961062), KeyResearch & Development Program of Guangxi Provence (2019AB16010), and Program of Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (2018JJA150089), and National College Students' innovation and entrepreneurship training program (S202110603170).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Human and animals rights
The research does not involve Human Participants and/or Animals.
Informed consent
All the authors in the manuscript are informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yue, H., Hu, T. & Duan, L. Examining the effect of housing density and composition on residential burglary in Wuhan, China. J Hous and the Built Environ 38, 399–417 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09951-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09951-3