Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying residualisation: the changing nature of social housing in the UK

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last 40 years, social housing has become dominated by households on low incomes. However, there is a lack of recent research that quantifies residualisation, particularly the historical trends. This paper therefore presents an Index of Residualisation as a novel means of quantifying the changes. Using the Index, it is shown that, in 2010 social housing in the UK was three times more residualised than in 1970, but that residualisation has been broadly stable over the last 20 years. However, the UK government’s social housing reforms are likely to change the tenure significantly and the impact of these changes on residualisation needs to be monitored. The Index is ideally suited to this role, and can also be used to investigate the drivers of residualisation and conduct comparative studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It should be noted that both Hamnett (1984) and Bentham (1986) refer to socio-tenurial polarisation rather than residualisation per se. However, these to constructs are closely linked, and for the purposes of measurement are instructive for the analysis of measurement.

  2. Ibid.

  3. For this scale, the first adult in a household counts as one unit, each subsequent adult as 0.5 and each child (under 15) as 0.3 units. The FES data counted those under 16 as children, so the equivalence calculations are not completely accurate, but are likely to be representative.

References

  • Bentham, G. (1986). Socio-tenurial polarization in the United Kingdom, 1953–1983: The income evidence. Urban Studies, 2, 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berube, A. (2005). Mixed communities in England: A US perspective on evidence and policy prospects. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, J. (1986). A social history of housing 1815–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, R., & Wilcox, S. (2000). Half the poor: Home-owners with low incomes. London: Council of Mortgage Lenders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, D. (2005). The meaning of housing: a pathways approach. Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Clapham, D., & McLennan, D. (1983). Residualisation of public housing: A non-issue. Housing Review, JanFeb, pp. 9–10.

  • Cole, I., & Furbey, R. (1994). The eclipse of council housing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2010). Grant Shapps: A fairer future for social housing, Monday 22 November. Retrieved from www.communities.gov.uk/news/newsroom/1775594.

  • Department for Communities, Local Government. (2011a). English Housing Survey: Household report 2009–10. London: Communities and Local Government Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities, Local Government. (2011b). Laying the foundations: A housing strategy for England. London: Communities and Local Government Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2013a). Housing statistics live table 241: House building: Permanent dwellings completed, by tenure, United Kingdom historical calendar year series. Retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/86136/LiveTable241.xls.

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2013b). Housing statistics live table 671: Social housing salesAnnual Right to Buy sales for England. Retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200034/Table_671.xls.

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2013c). Housing statistics live table 801: Tenure trend, from 1918. Retrieved from www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/xls/141491.xls.

  • Diacon, D., Pattison, B., Strutt, J., & Vine, J. (2010). Support with housing costs: Developing a simplified and sustainable system. Coalville: Building and Social Housing Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, R. (1988). Political acquiescence, privatisation and residualisation in British housing policy. Journal of Social Policy, 17(3), 289–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R., & Murie, A. (1983). Residualization and council housing: Aspects of the changing social relations of housing tenure. Journal of Social Policy, 12, 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R., & Murie, A. (1988). Selling the welfare state: The privatisation of public housing. Worcester: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamnett, C. (1984). Housing the two nations: Socio-tenurial polarization in England and Wales, 1961–81. Urban Studies, 43, 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harloe, M. (1978). The green paper on housing policy. In M. Brown & S. Baldwin (Eds.), The year book of social policy in Britain 1977 (pp. 3–21). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (2007). Ends and means: The future roles of social housing in England. London: LSE London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homes and Communities Agency. (n.d.). National Affordable Housing Programme. Retrieved from www.homesandcommunities.co.uk/ourwork/national-affordable-housing-programme and Affordable Homes Programme. Retrieved from www.homesandcommunities.co.uk/affordable-homes.

  • House of Commons Library. (2011). Affordable Rent model. London: House of Commons Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P., & Murie, A. (1997). Poverty, housing tenure and social exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Localism Act. (2011). London: The Stationery Office.

  • London Borough of Newham. (2011). Review of housing allocations policy. Retrieved from mgov.newham.gov.uk/mgConvert2PDF.aspx?ID=44409.

  • Lupton, R., Tunstall, R., Sigle-Rushton, W., Obolenskaya, P., Sabates, R., Meschi, E., et al. (2009). Growing up in social housing: A profile of four generations, 1946 to the present day. London: Tenant Services Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, P. (1983). Residualisation and the restructuring of housing tenure. Housing Review, MarApr, pp. 44–45.

  • Malpass, P. (1990). Reshaping housing policy: Subsidies, rents and residualisation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, P., & Murie, A. (1982). Housing policy and practice. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, P., & Victory, C. (2010). The modernisation of social housing in England. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, D., & Murie, A. (2006). Housing policy in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murie, A. (1997). The social rented sector, housing and the welfare state in the UK. Housing Studies, 12(4), 437–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murie, A. (2006). Moving with the times: Changing frameworks for housing research and policy. In P. Malpass & L. Cairncross (Eds.), Building on the past (pp. 15–50). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murie, A. (2008). Social housing privatisation in England. In K. Scanlon & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Social housing in Europe II: A review of policies and outcomes (pp. 241–259). London: LSE London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murie, A. (2009). The modernisation of housing in England. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100(4), 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office. (2010). The Decent Homes Programme. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. (2013). Family Expenditure Survey, 1970–2000. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics, Department for Environment, Food, Rural Affairs. (2013). Expenditure and Food Survey, 2001–2007. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics, Social, Vital Statistics Division. (2013). Living Costs and Food Survey, 2008–2010. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, H., & Kintrea, K. (2002). Part of the problem or part of the solution? Social housing allocation policies and social exclusion in Britain. Journal of Social Policy, 31(4), 643–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, K., & Whitehead, C. (2007). Social Housing in Europe. London: LSE London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1976). An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44(2), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, M., & van Steen, G. (2011). ‘Housing Poverty’ and Income Poverty in England and The Netherlands. Housing Studies, 26(7–8), 1035–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, D. B. (1977). Measurement of tax progressivity. American Economic Review, 67(4), 747–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgersen, U. (1987). Housing: The wobbly pillar under the welfare state. In B. Turner, J. Kemeny, & L. Lundqvist (Eds.), Between state and market: Housing in the post-industrial era (pp. 116–126). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandsworth Borough Council. (2011). Councillors back housing into work pilot, Thursday 24 November. Retrieved from www.wandsworth.gov.uk/news/article/10857/councillors_back_housing_into_work_pilot.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Alan Murie and one other anonymous reviewer who provided extensive and helpful feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jen Pearce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearce, J., Vine, J. Quantifying residualisation: the changing nature of social housing in the UK. J Hous and the Built Environ 29, 657–675 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-013-9372-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-013-9372-3

Keywords

Navigation