Abstract
This paper focuses on customers’ views on the extent that bookmakers and individuals are responsible for a duty of care. 72 participants from seven bookmakers in one city in England were interviewed that illustrates customers expect bookmakers to take ‘reasonable steps’ to avoid exploiting all customers. However, the customers’ views recorded in this paper illustrate a range of views on what a duty of care should actually comprise with differences of opinion on the level of bookmakers and individuals level of responsibility, dealing with intoxicated customers, illegal gambling, prevention of excessive and problem gambling and self-exclusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer, J. (2006). Self-exclusion and the problem gambler: The house shouldn’t always win. Northern Illinois University Law Review, 27, 63–93.
Belaisha, B. B., & Brooks, G. (2014). Money laundering in Dubai: Strategies and future directions. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 343–354.
Bernardi, S., & Pallanti, S. (2009). Internet addiction: A descriptive clinical study focusing on comorbidities and dissociative symptoms. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50(6), 510–516.
Blaszczynski, A. (2005). To formulate gambling policies on the premise that problem gambling is an addiction may be premature. Addiction, 100, 1230–1231.
Blaszczynski, A., & McConaghy, N. (1994). Criminal offences in gamblers anonymous and hospital treated pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10(2), 99–127.
Brooks, G. (2012). Online gambling and money laundering: Views from the inside. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 15(3), 304–315.
Brooks, G., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011). Judicial decisions on cases involving problem gambling and crime in England and Wales. International Gambling Studies, 11(1), 81–93.
Bulmer, M. (2003). Sociological research methods: An introduction. NJ: Transactions Press.
Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd. (2008). England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions. London: Courts of Justice.
Cameron, J. (2007). Problem gamblers and the duty of care: A response to Sasso and Kalajdzic’. Gaming Law Review, 11(5), 554–571.
Collins, P., & Kelly, J. (2002). Problem gambling and self-exclusion: A report to the South African responsible gambling trust. Gaming Law Review, 6(6), 517–531.
Corney, R., & Davis, J. (2010). The attractions and risks of internet gambling for women: A qualitative study. Journal of Gambling Issues: Issue, 24, 121–139.
Crofts, P. (2003). Problem gambling and property offences: An analysis of court files. International Gambling Studies, 3(2), 183–197.
Crowne, E. (2008). The problem with problem gaming: A response to Sasso and Kalajdzic, in defense of the gaming industry. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 12(4), 340–343.
Faregh, N., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2009). Reflection on the voluntary self exclusion of gamblers and the law suits against ontario lottery and gaming corporation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(2), 131–138.
Farooq, K., & Brooks, G. (2013). Arab fraud and corruption professionals’ views in the Arabian Gulf. Journal of Financial Crime, 20(3), 338–347.
Fernandez-Alba, A., & Labrador, F. (2005). Socio-demographic, psychopathological and clinical characteristics of pathological slot-machine gamblers in treatment: A descriptive study of Spanish male gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 113–122.
Gainsbury, S. M. (2014). Review of self exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 229–251.
Gambling Commission. (2012). Survey data on gambling participation. Birmingham, UK: Gambling Commission.
Gambling Commission. (2014). Gambling codes of practice: Consolidated for all forms of gambling. Birmingham, UK: Gambling Commission.
Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2011). Self-exclusion as a harm minimisation strategy: Evidence for the casino sector from selected European countries. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 685–700.
Kalajdzic, J. (2008). Cameron’s rejection of a duty of care to problem gamblers: A problematic defense of ontario’s gaming industry’. Gaming Law Review, 12(1), 55–59.
Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & LeBlond, J. (2000). Brief communications analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460.
Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 85–94.
McNeilly, D. P., & Burke, W. J. (2000). Late life gambling: The attitudes and behaviours of older adults. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 393–415.
Meyer, G., & Stadler, M. (1999). Criminal behaviour associated with pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(1), 29–43.
Napolitano, F. (2003). The self exclusion program: Legal and clinical consideration. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(3), 303–315.
Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R., Kaplan, S., & Shaffe, H. J. (2010). One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self excluders four to ten years after enrolment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 129–144.
Nelson, S. E., La Plante, D. A., Allyson, A. J., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Real limits in the virtual world: Self limiting behaviour of internet gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 463–477.
Orford, J. (2001). Excessive appetites: A psychological view of addictions. Chichester: Wiley.
Rhea, A. (2005). Voluntary self-exclusion lists: How they work and potential problems. Gaming Law Review, 9(5), 462–469.
Sasso, W. V., & Kalajdzic, J. (2006). Do Ontario and its gaming venues owe a duty of care to problem gamblers? Gaming Law Review, 10(6), 552–570.
Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011). Gambling prevalence survey. London: NatCen.
Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W., Tidwell, M. -C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2007). Type of gambling and availability as risk factors for problem gambling: A tobit regression analysis by age and gender. International Gambling Studies, 7(2), 183–198.
Widyanto, L., & Griffiths, M. (2006). ‘Internet addiction’: A critical review. International Journal of Mental health and Addiction, 4(1), 31–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brooks, G., Sparrow, P. Bookmakers and a Duty of Care: Customers’ Views in England. J Gambl Stud 32, 737–747 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9544-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9544-z