Skip to main content
Log in

Bookmakers and a Duty of Care: Customers’ Views in England

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on customers’ views on the extent that bookmakers and individuals are responsible for a duty of care. 72 participants from seven bookmakers in one city in England were interviewed that illustrates customers expect bookmakers to take ‘reasonable steps’ to avoid exploiting all customers. However, the customers’ views recorded in this paper illustrate a range of views on what a duty of care should actually comprise with differences of opinion on the level of bookmakers and individuals level of responsibility, dealing with intoxicated customers, illegal gambling, prevention of excessive and problem gambling and self-exclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer, J. (2006). Self-exclusion and the problem gambler: The house shouldn’t always win. Northern Illinois University Law Review, 27, 63–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belaisha, B. B., & Brooks, G. (2014). Money laundering in Dubai: Strategies and future directions. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, S., & Pallanti, S. (2009). Internet addiction: A descriptive clinical study focusing on comorbidities and dissociative symptoms. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50(6), 510–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A. (2005). To formulate gambling policies on the premise that problem gambling is an addiction may be premature. Addiction, 100, 1230–1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., & McConaghy, N. (1994). Criminal offences in gamblers anonymous and hospital treated pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10(2), 99–127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, G. (2012). Online gambling and money laundering: Views from the inside. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 15(3), 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, G., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011). Judicial decisions on cases involving problem gambling and crime in England and Wales. International Gambling Studies, 11(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (2003). Sociological research methods: An introduction. NJ: Transactions Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd. (2008). England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions. London: Courts of Justice.

  • Cameron, J. (2007). Problem gamblers and the duty of care: A response to Sasso and Kalajdzic’. Gaming Law Review, 11(5), 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P., & Kelly, J. (2002). Problem gambling and self-exclusion: A report to the South African responsible gambling trust. Gaming Law Review, 6(6), 517–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corney, R., & Davis, J. (2010). The attractions and risks of internet gambling for women: A qualitative study. Journal of Gambling Issues: Issue, 24, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crofts, P. (2003). Problem gambling and property offences: An analysis of court files. International Gambling Studies, 3(2), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, E. (2008). The problem with problem gaming: A response to Sasso and Kalajdzic, in defense of the gaming industry. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 12(4), 340–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faregh, N., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2009). Reflection on the voluntary self exclusion of gamblers and the law suits against ontario lottery and gaming corporation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(2), 131–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq, K., & Brooks, G. (2013). Arab fraud and corruption professionals’ views in the Arabian Gulf. Journal of Financial Crime, 20(3), 338–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Alba, A., & Labrador, F. (2005). Socio-demographic, psychopathological and clinical characteristics of pathological slot-machine gamblers in treatment: A descriptive study of Spanish male gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainsbury, S. M. (2014). Review of self exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 229–251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gambling Commission. (2012). Survey data on gambling participation. Birmingham, UK: Gambling Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling Commission. (2014). Gambling codes of practice: Consolidated for all forms of gambling. Birmingham, UK: Gambling Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2011). Self-exclusion as a harm minimisation strategy: Evidence for the casino sector from selected European countries. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 685–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalajdzic, J. (2008). Cameron’s rejection of a duty of care to problem gamblers: A problematic defense of ontario’s gaming industry’. Gaming Law Review, 12(1), 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & LeBlond, J. (2000). Brief communications analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 85–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, D. P., & Burke, W. J. (2000). Late life gambling: The attitudes and behaviours of older adults. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 393–415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G., & Stadler, M. (1999). Criminal behaviour associated with pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(1), 29–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, F. (2003). The self exclusion program: Legal and clinical consideration. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(3), 303–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R., Kaplan, S., & Shaffe, H. J. (2010). One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self excluders four to ten years after enrolment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 129–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. E., La Plante, D. A., Allyson, A. J., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Real limits in the virtual world: Self limiting behaviour of internet gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 463–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J. (2001). Excessive appetites: A psychological view of addictions. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhea, A. (2005). Voluntary self-exclusion lists: How they work and potential problems. Gaming Law Review, 9(5), 462–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasso, W. V., & Kalajdzic, J. (2006). Do Ontario and its gaming venues owe a duty of care to problem gamblers? Gaming Law Review, 10(6), 552–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011). Gambling prevalence survey. London: NatCen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W., Tidwell, M. -C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2007). Type of gambling and availability as risk factors for problem gambling: A tobit regression analysis by age and gender. International Gambling Studies, 7(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widyanto, L., & Griffiths, M. (2006). ‘Internet addiction’: A critical review. International Journal of Mental health and Addiction, 4(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Brooks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brooks, G., Sparrow, P. Bookmakers and a Duty of Care: Customers’ Views in England. J Gambl Stud 32, 737–747 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9544-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9544-z

Keywords

Navigation