Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Targeted Neighborhood Sampling: A New Approach for Recruiting Abusive Couples

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted two studies to test the utility of a new strategy for recruiting couples experiencing intimate partner violence. This new strategy, Targeted Neighborhood Sampling, involves utilizing police reports of family fight calls to target particular areas within a city for recruitment efforts. Study I compared the efficacy of using this method to recruit a random versus a convenience sample. Results demonstrated that Targeted Neighborhood Sampling was most effective when recruiting a convenience sample of participants who responded to flyers left at their residences. Study II used a convenience sample and replicated the findings from Study I. Across the two studies, 40.4% of those who called after receiving a flyer experienced male-to-female partner violence within the past year. In addition, we combined data across studies and correlated types of violence the couples experienced with variables commonly associated with abuse. Psychological aggression, physical assault, and injury were all positively associated with reports of demand-withdrawal and mutual avoidance during conflict, as well as depression and symptoms of post traumatic disorder syndrome. Sexual coercion was associated with drug abuse. These results demonstrate the utility and validity of Targeted Neighborhood Sampling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All materials we used in the project that were in Spanish were translated by an individual fluent in Spanish, and then back translated by a native Spanish speaker from Mexico.

  2. An acceptable alpha did not emerge for the sexual coercion measures for the women in the sample.

References

  • Aldarondo, E., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). Risk marker analysis of the cessation and persistence of wife assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1010–1019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, E. B., Jones-Alexander, J., Buckley, T. C., & Forneris, C. A. (1996). Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behavior Research and Therapy, 34, 669–673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, J., & Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the conflict tactics scale: Using couple data to quantify differential reporting effect. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 375–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B. E., McNutt, L. A., & Choi, D. Y. (2003). Childhood and adult abuse among women in primary health care. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 924–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (2005). Communications patterns questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Thompson, M. P., McKeown, R. E., Bethea, L. & Davis, K. E. (2002). Social support protects against the negative effects of partner violence. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 11, 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunradi, C. B., Caetano, R., & Schafer, J. (2002). Alcohol-related problems, drug use, and male intimate partner violence severity among US couples. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, C., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2007). Representative sampling of martially violent and non-violent couples: A feasibility study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, in press.

  • Fugate, M., Landis, L., Riordan, K., Naureckas, S., & Engel, B. (2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: Implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 11, 290–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giles-Sims, J. (1983). Wife battering: A systems theory approach. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, J. M. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 99–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003). Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships: The effect of sampling. Violence and Victims, 18, 181–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, E., & Lupri, E. (1997). Intimate violence in Canada and the United States: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 417–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Stuart, G. L. (1998). Demand and withdraw communication among couples experiencing husband violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 731–743.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, I. W. (2003). Substance use and abused women’s utilization of the police. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2006). Violence and abuse in personal relationships: Conflict, terror, and resistance in intimate partnerships. In A. Vangelisiti, & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 557–578). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukinen, C. (2004). The help-seeking strategies of female violence-crime victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 967–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, S., Caetano, R., Field, C. A., & Bazargan, S. (2005). The role of alcohol use and depression in intimate partner violence among Black and Hispanic patients in an urban emergency room department. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 225–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, S. A., & Emery, B. C. (2000). The context and dynamics of intimate aggression against women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, I. G., Leonard, K. E., & Senchak, M. (1992). Prevalence and distribution of premarital aggression among couples applying for a marriage license. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Corell, A., & Marcus, D. K. (2004). Partner abuse, learned helplessness, and trauma symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 445–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, T. E. (1996). Separation anxiety and social dependency in children exposed to wife abuse. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(07), 4749B (University Microfilms N. AAD96-39586).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, M. R., & Saltzman, L. E. (2003). The nature and extent of recurring intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34, 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathus, J. H., & Feindler, E. L. (2004). Assessment of partner violence: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selzer, M. L., Vinokur, A., & van Rooijen, L. A. (1975). A self-administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST). Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 117–126.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, H. A. (1982). The drug abuse screening test (DAST). Addictive Behaviors, 7, 363–371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Slep, A. M., Heyman, R. E., Williams M. C., Van Dyke, C. E., & O’Leary, S. G. (2005). Using random telephone sampling to recruit generalizable samples for family violence studies. Panel discussion at the national conference of the Association for Behavior and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT), Washington, DC, Nov.

  • Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in American families. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., & Smith, C. (1990). Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: Incidence rates and structural interpretations. In M. Straus (Ed.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. P., Saltzman, L. E., & Johnson, H. (2003). A comparison of risk factors for intimate partner violence-related injury across two national surveys on violence against women. Violence Against Women, 9, 438–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlotnick, C., Johnson, D. M., & Kohn, R. (2006). Intimate partner violence and long-term psychosocial functioning in a national sample of American women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 262–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This project was supported by a grant from the Institute of Social Science Research, Arizona State University. The authors would like to thank Mary Anders, Bridget Granville, Melissa Hutton, Ashley Irvin, Casey Sechler, and Anita Shelbrack, for their contributions to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Scott Christopher.

Additional information

A version of this paper was presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Family Relations, November 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christopher, F.S., Pflieger, J.C., Canary, D.J. et al. Targeted Neighborhood Sampling: A New Approach for Recruiting Abusive Couples. J Fam Viol 23, 89–100 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9130-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9130-y

Keywords

Navigation