Abstract
We conducted two studies to test the utility of a new strategy for recruiting couples experiencing intimate partner violence. This new strategy, Targeted Neighborhood Sampling, involves utilizing police reports of family fight calls to target particular areas within a city for recruitment efforts. Study I compared the efficacy of using this method to recruit a random versus a convenience sample. Results demonstrated that Targeted Neighborhood Sampling was most effective when recruiting a convenience sample of participants who responded to flyers left at their residences. Study II used a convenience sample and replicated the findings from Study I. Across the two studies, 40.4% of those who called after receiving a flyer experienced male-to-female partner violence within the past year. In addition, we combined data across studies and correlated types of violence the couples experienced with variables commonly associated with abuse. Psychological aggression, physical assault, and injury were all positively associated with reports of demand-withdrawal and mutual avoidance during conflict, as well as depression and symptoms of post traumatic disorder syndrome. Sexual coercion was associated with drug abuse. These results demonstrate the utility and validity of Targeted Neighborhood Sampling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All materials we used in the project that were in Spanish were translated by an individual fluent in Spanish, and then back translated by a native Spanish speaker from Mexico.
An acceptable alpha did not emerge for the sexual coercion measures for the women in the sample.
References
Aldarondo, E., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). Risk marker analysis of the cessation and persistence of wife assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1010–1019.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
Blanchard, E. B., Jones-Alexander, J., Buckley, T. C., & Forneris, C. A. (1996). Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behavior Research and Therapy, 34, 669–673.
Browning, J., & Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the conflict tactics scale: Using couple data to quantify differential reporting effect. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 375–379.
Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331–1336.
Carlson, B. E., McNutt, L. A., & Choi, D. Y. (2003). Childhood and adult abuse among women in primary health care. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 924–941.
Christensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (2005). Communications patterns questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cooker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Thompson, M. P., McKeown, R. E., Bethea, L. & Davis, K. E. (2002). Social support protects against the negative effects of partner violence. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 11, 465–476.
Cunradi, C. B., Caetano, R., & Schafer, J. (2002). Alcohol-related problems, drug use, and male intimate partner violence severity among US couples. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 493–500.
Farris, C., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2007). Representative sampling of martially violent and non-violent couples: A feasibility study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, in press.
Fugate, M., Landis, L., Riordan, K., Naureckas, S., & Engel, B. (2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: Implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 11, 290–310.
Giles-Sims, J. (1983). Wife battering: A systems theory approach. New York: Guildford Press.
Golding, J. M. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 99–132.
Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003). Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships: The effect of sampling. Violence and Victims, 18, 181–196.
Grandin, E., & Lupri, E. (1997). Intimate violence in Canada and the United States: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 417–443.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Stuart, G. L. (1998). Demand and withdraw communication among couples experiencing husband violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 731–743.
Hutchison, I. W. (2003). Substance use and abused women’s utilization of the police. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 93–106.
Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.
Johnson, M. (2006). Violence and abuse in personal relationships: Conflict, terror, and resistance in intimate partnerships. In A. Vangelisiti, & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 557–578). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.
Kaukinen, C. (2004). The help-seeking strategies of female violence-crime victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 967–990.
Lipsky, S., Caetano, R., Field, C. A., & Bazargan, S. (2005). The role of alcohol use and depression in intimate partner violence among Black and Hispanic patients in an urban emergency room department. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 225–242.
Lloyd, S. A., & Emery, B. C. (2000). The context and dynamics of intimate aggression against women. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 503–521.
McLaughlin, I. G., Leonard, K. E., & Senchak, M. (1992). Prevalence and distribution of premarital aggression among couples applying for a marriage license. Journal of Family Violence, 7, 309–319.
Parker-Corell, A., & Marcus, D. K. (2004). Partner abuse, learned helplessness, and trauma symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 445–462.
Pease, T. E. (1996). Separation anxiety and social dependency in children exposed to wife abuse. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(07), 4749B (University Microfilms N. AAD96-39586).
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
Rand, M. R., & Saltzman, L. E. (2003). The nature and extent of recurring intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34, 137–149.
Rathus, J. H., & Feindler, E. L. (2004). Assessment of partner violence: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Selzer, M. L., Vinokur, A., & van Rooijen, L. A. (1975). A self-administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST). Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 117–126.
Skinner, H. A. (1982). The drug abuse screening test (DAST). Addictive Behaviors, 7, 363–371.
Smith-Slep, A. M., Heyman, R. E., Williams M. C., Van Dyke, C. E., & O’Leary, S. G. (2005). Using random telephone sampling to recruit generalizable samples for family violence studies. Panel discussion at the national conference of the Association for Behavior and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT), Washington, DC, Nov.
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465–479.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in American families. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.
Straus, M. A., & Smith, C. (1990). Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: Incidence rates and structural interpretations. In M. Straus (Ed.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Thompson, M. P., Saltzman, L. E., & Johnson, H. (2003). A comparison of risk factors for intimate partner violence-related injury across two national surveys on violence against women. Violence Against Women, 9, 438–457.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142–161.
Zlotnick, C., Johnson, D. M., & Kohn, R. (2006). Intimate partner violence and long-term psychosocial functioning in a national sample of American women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 262–275.
Acknowledgement
This project was supported by a grant from the Institute of Social Science Research, Arizona State University. The authors would like to thank Mary Anders, Bridget Granville, Melissa Hutton, Ashley Irvin, Casey Sechler, and Anita Shelbrack, for their contributions to this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A version of this paper was presented at the annual conference of the National Council on Family Relations, November 2006.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christopher, F.S., Pflieger, J.C., Canary, D.J. et al. Targeted Neighborhood Sampling: A New Approach for Recruiting Abusive Couples. J Fam Viol 23, 89–100 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9130-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9130-y