Abstract
Various types of augmentative and alternative communication systems have been successfully used to enable functional communication in children with developmental disabilities. The effects of such systems on natural speech production have also been investigated, but few studies have explored the effects of specific procedures aim at inducing natural speech within interventions focused on teaching functional use of augmentative and alternative communication systems. The current study investigated the effectiveness of a behavior intervention package for teaching functional use (manding) of an augmentative and alternative communication device and production of vocal mands with three children with developmental disabilities. The findings indicated that combining augmented and the behavioral intervention package facilitated the acquisition of vocalization and augmented mands. Further, one child showed generalization of the two different communication modes across communicative partners. Limitations of the study and implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cagliani, R., Ayres, R., Whiteside, K., & Ringdahl, M. (2017). Picture exchange communication system and delay to reinforcement. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 29, 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9564-y.
Carbone, V. J., Sweeney-Kerwin, E. J., Attanasio, V., & Kasper, T. (2010). Increasing the vocal responses of children with autism and developmental disabilities using manual sign mand training and prompt delay. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-705.
Charlop-Christy, M. H., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L. A., & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-213.
DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
Elliott, S. N., & Von Brock Trueting, M. (1991). The behavior intervention rating scale: Development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(91)90014-I.
Esch, B. E. (2008). Early echoic skills assessment. In M. L. Sundberg (Ed.), Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP (p. 24). Concord: AVB Press.
Ganz, J. B., & Simpson, R. L. (2004). Effects on communicative requesting and speech development of the picture exchange communication system in children with characteristics of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 395–409.
Ganz, J. B., Simpson, R. L., & Corbin-Newsome, J. (2008). The impact of the picture exchange communication system on requesting and speech development in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders and similar characteristics. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2007.04.005.
Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Heath, A. K., Parker, R. I., Rispoli, M. J., & Duran, J. B. (2012). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1212-2.
Ganz, J. B., Hong, E. R., & Goodwyn, F. D. (2013). Effectiveness of the PECS Phase III app and choice between the app and traditional PECS among preschoolers with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 973–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.04.003.
Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2010). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 199–233). New York: Sage Publications.
Genc-Tosun, D., & Kurt, O. (2017). Teaching multi-step requesting to children with autism spectrum disorder using systematic instruction and a speech generating device. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1378717.
Gevarter, C., & Horan, K. (2018). A behavioral intervention package to increase vocalizations of individuals with autism during speech-generating device intervention. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28, 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9300-4.
Gevarter, C., O'Reilly, M. F., Kuhn, M., Mills, K., Ferguson, R., Watkins, L., Sigafoos, J., Lang, R., Rojeski, L., & Lancioni, G. E. (2016). Increasing the vocalizations of individuals with autism during intervention with a speech-generating device. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.270.
Greenberg, A. L., Tomaino, M. E., & Charlop, M. H. (2014). Adapting the picture exchange communication system to elicit vocalizations in children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-013-9344-2.
Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation on the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189.
Johnston, S., Reichle, J., & Evans, J. (2004). Supporting augmentative and alternative communication use by beginning communicators with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 13, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2004/004).
Kasari, C., Kaiser, A., Goods, K., Nietfeld, J., Mathy, P., Landa, R., Murphy, S., & Almirall, D. (2014). Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2014.01.019.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford.
Layton, T. L., & Watson, L. R. (1995). Enhancing communication in nonverbal children with autism). In K. A. Quill (Ed.), Teaching children with autism: Strategies to enhance communication and socialization (pp. 73–103). New York: Delmar.
Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021).
Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2003/017).
Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006.
Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Schlosser, R. W., Stevens, M., . . . Marschik, P. B. (2014). An evaluation of speech production in two boys with neurodevelopmental disorders who received communication intervention with a speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 38, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.07.003.
Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156.
Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., Behrmann, M. M., & Sutton, K. A. (1998). Increasing communicative interactions of young children with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-561.
Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021).
Schlosser, R. W., Belfiore, P. J., Nigam, R., Blischak, D., & Hetzroni, O. (1995). The effects of speech output technology in the learning of graphic symbols. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 537–549.
Schlosser, R. W., Sigafoos, J., Luiselli, J. K., Angermeier, K., Harasymowyz, U., Schooley, K., & Belfiore, P. J. (2007). Effects of synthetic speech output on requesting and natural speech production in children with autism: A preliminary study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2006.10.001.
Sigafoos, J., Wermink, H., Didden, R., Green, V. A., Schlosser, R. W., O’Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). Effects of varying lengths of synthetic speech output on augmented requesting and natural speech production in an adolescent with Klinefelter syndrome. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.610355.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: appleton Century-Crofts.
Sundberg, M. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program. Concord: AVB Press.
The Attainment Company (2017). Go talk now (Version 4.11.14). [Mobile application software]. Retrieved January 14 from https://www.attainmentcompany.com/gotalk-now.
Tincani, M. (2004). Comparing the picture exchange communication system and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 152–163.
Tincani, M., Crozier, S., & Alazetta, L. (2006). The picture exchange communication system: Effects on manding and speech development for school-aged children with autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 177–184.
Torelli, J. N., Lambert, J. M., Da Fonte, M. A., Denham, K. N., Jedrzynski, T. M., & Houchins-Juarez, N. J. (2016). Assessing acquisition of and preference for Mand topographies during functional communication training. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0083-y.
Acknowledgements
Appreciation is extended to Dr. Jeff Sigafoos for helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by a university institutional review board and a parental consent form was obtained for each participant.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from the parents of each participant included in the study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alzrayer, N.M., Muharib, R. & Wood, C. Effects of a Behavior Intervention Package on Augmented and Vocal Mands by Children with Developmental Disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil 32, 57–74 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09681-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09681-5