Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Initial Investigation of the Kit for Kids Peer Educational Program

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large number of students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) receive instruction in general education classrooms; therefore, students with ASD and typically-developing peers are likely to interact throughout the school day. Although research indicates that typically-developing peers play a critical role in supporting successful inclusive experiences for students with ASD, research suggests that elementary and middle school students report limited knowledge and awareness of ASD. Peer education programs have been used to promote and support acceptance of students with ASD in general education settings; however, research on these programs is still emerging. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the Kit for Kids (KfK) program, which is a peer educational program designed by the Organization of Autism Research. Using Grounded Theory methodology, researchers conducted an evaluation of students’ initial impressions of the KfK program as well as suggestions for improving peer education efforts on behalf of students with ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauminger, N., Shulman, C., & Agam, G. (2003). Peer interactions and loneliness in high-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 489–507. doi:10.1023/B:JODD.0000026616.24896.c8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. (2006). Changing children’s attitudes towards autism: a process of persuasive communication. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 18, 251–272. doi:10.1007/s10882-006-9015-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. (2007). Middle school students' response to the self-introduction of a student with autism: effects of perceived similarity, prior awareness, and educational message. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 163–173. doi:10.1177/07419325070280030501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M., & Barger, B. D. (2011). Middle school students’ knowledge of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 732–740. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1092-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M., Ferguson, J. E., Herzinger, C. V., Jackson, J. N., & Marino, C. A. (2004). Combined descriptive and explanatory information improves peers’ perceptions of autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 321–339. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, B., Kasari, C., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2007). Involvement or isolation? The social networks of children with autism in regular classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 230–242. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0164-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAFE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, N. (2010). The Gulliford Lecture: Bullying or befriending? Children’s responses to classmates with special needs. British Journal of Special Education, 37, 4–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8578.2009.00452.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).

  • Little, L. (2002). Middle-class mothers’ perceptions of peer and sibling victimization among children with Asperger’s syndrome and nonverbal learning disorders. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 25, 43–57. doi:10.1080/014608602753504847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magiati, E., Dockrell, J. E., & Logotheti, A. (2002). Young children’s understanding of disabilities: the influence of development, context, and cognition. Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 409–430. doi:10.1016/s0193-3973(02)00126-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. J., & Sessions, M. M. (2005). Infusing tolerance, diversity, and social personal curriculum into inclusive social studies classes using family portraits and contextual teaching and learning. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 1, n3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Autism Research. (2012). What’s up with Nick? Arlington: Author www.researchautism.org/resources/links/documents/KidsGuide_Accordion.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rillotta, F., & Nettelbeck, T. (2007). Effects of an awareness program on attitudes of students without an intellectual disability towards persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32, 19–27. doi:10.1080/13668250701194042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, C., Levine, P., & Blackorby, J. (2008). A national profile of students with autism: a special topic report from the special education elementary longitudinal study. Menlo Park: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silton, N., Campbell, J. M., & Roulton, K. (2011). A descriptive analysis of elementary school students’ conceptions of autism. Presented at the 2011 annual meeting of the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR), San Diego, CA.

  • Zablotsky, B., Bradshaw, C. P., Anderson, C., & Law, P. (2012). Bullying among children with autism spectrum disorders: parents’ perspectives on the influence of school factors. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 179–191. doi:10.1177/13623613477920.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten A. Scheil.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research is supported by a grant from the Organization for Autism Research.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendix

Appendix

Procedural Fidelity Data Form

Observer:_______________________

Step

Performed

 1. Materials Ready

 

 2. Session cue:

 

 3. Read introduction

 

 4. Hold up cover to show class

 

 5. Turn to page 1

 

 6. Ask – what do you think she means by different?

 

 7. Ask – what are some things different about Nick?

 

 8. Ask—Are we all the same? Do some of us get to do different things in class?

 

 9. Turn to page 2

 

 10. Ask—What is autism?

 

 11. Read/Ask—Nick learns things in a different way. Do we all learn in the same way, or sometimes in different ways?

 

 12. Ask—Can you catch autism?

 

 13. Turn to page 3

 

 14. Ask—Are all kids with autism the same?

 

 15. Ask—What are some things you might see someone with autism do?

 

 16. Ask—What are some things you might do to make yourself comfortable?

 

 17. Turn to page 4

 

 18. Ask—What are some other things someone with autism might do?

 

 19. What are some things you like to do?

 

 20. Turn to page 5

 

 21. Ask—Is autism scary?

 

 22. Ask—Is someone with autism a person just like me or you?

 

 23. Turn to page 6

 

 24. Ask—What are some things you like to change around you to help you to focus?

 

 25. Turn to page 7

 

 26. Ask—Is it ok for some people to need more help than others?

 

 27. Ask—Can we be friends with someone with autism?

 

 28. Read conclusion

 

 29. Say “Autism isn’t something to be scared of. Everyone is different and people with autism are just like everyone else.”

 

Number Observed

 
  1. Procedural Fidelity Key: √ = correct instructor behavior
  2. Procedural Fidelity = (Number Observed / 29) X 100
  3. Procedural Fidelity Score: ________%

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheil, K.A., Bowers-Campbell, J. & Campbell, J.M. An Initial Investigation of the Kit for Kids Peer Educational Program. J Dev Phys Disabil 29, 643–662 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9540-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9540-6

Keywords

Navigation