Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resistance to Socialization into Organizational Corruption: A Model of Deontic Justice

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to develop a deontic model of corruption in organizations. This model intends to explain newcomers’ resistance to socialization into corrupt practices.

Design/Methodology/Approach

This article uses deontic justice as a conceptual framework to indicate whether adherence to deontic principles could help reduce the tendency to be engaged in corrupt practices in the workplace.

Findings

The fundamental premise of the deontic model of organizational corruption is that newcomers with strong deontic principles would be more likely to resist socialization into corruption and take actions to reduce the corrupt nature of their organization than those with weak deontic principles. The model also suggests that newcomers with strong deontic principles would be more likely to leave corrupt organizations than those with weak deontic principles.

Implications

To assess the impact of deontic principles on resistance to socialization into corruption, organizational scholars could develop a scale measuring people’s adherence to deontic principles—a deonance scale. The deontic model of organizational corruption could be used to train employees in considering fairness as a moral obligation. To the extent that employees consider fairness as a moral duty, they would be less likely to engage in corrupt practices.

Originality/Value

This article is the first to the best of my knowledge to blend together the literature on the theory of deontic justice and the literature on corruption in organizations. In this regard, the article breaks new grounds that could help organizational scholars study corruption through the lens of fairness and justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Gioa, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33, 670–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, W. (1952). White-collar crime and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 58, 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23, 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E. J. (1996). Ethics and human well-being: An introduction to moral philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. K., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J., & Lai, C. (2002). Is the efficiency wage efficient? The social norm and organizational corruption. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104, 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, M. B., & Yeager, P. C. (1980). Corporate crime. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. W. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 406–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. D. (1998). Criminality in the corporate organization. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1–20). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. M., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Personality, integrity, and white collar crime: A construct validity study. Personnel Psychology, 46, 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2001). Doing justice to organizational justice. In S. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 217–242). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. R. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 1019–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317–372). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as moral virtue. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 13–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 3–33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Gerald & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215–245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1998). The cognitive geometry of employee theft: Negotiating the line between taking and stealing. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 147–193). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 985–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Scott, K. S. (1996). Why do workers bite the hands that feed them? Employee theft as a social exchange process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 111–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays in moral development Volume 1: The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, D. (2008). A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Academy of Management Review, 33, 710–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2002). Corruption and organization in Asian management systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2004). An organizational perspective of corruption. Management and Organization Review, 1, 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C., Joshi, M., & Anand V. (2005). The role of values and emotions in newcomers’ socialization into organizational corruption. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, SIM, J1–J6.

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 38, 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meara, N. M. (2001). Just and virtuous leaders in organizations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay between logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33, 750–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1998). Justice: Just a rational choice? Social Justice Research, 12, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (2008). Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfarrer, M. D., DeCelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33, 730–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organizational-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33, 685–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr., & Biderman, A. D. (1980). Data sources on white-collar lawbreaking. Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. C., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145–151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W. (1980). Three modes of organizational corruption in agencies of social control. Social Problems, 27, 478–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. S., Paternoster, R., & Piquero, N. L. (1998). Exploring the macro-micro link in corporate crime research. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 15, 35–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. (1949). White-collar crime. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 10, 558–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwajkowski, E. (1985). Organizational illegality: Theoretical integration and illustrative application. Academy of Management Review, 10, 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 839–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1992). The macro-micro connection in white-collar crime theory. In K. Schegel & D. Weisburd (Eds.), White collar crime reconsidered (pp. 124–145). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constant D. Beugré.

Additional information

Received and reviewed by former editor, George Neuman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beugré, C.D. Resistance to Socialization into Organizational Corruption: A Model of Deontic Justice. J Bus Psychol 25, 533–541 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9176-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9176-3

Keywords

Navigation