Skip to main content
Log in

The Crafting of Jobs and Individual Differences

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of spontaneous, unsupervised changes in jobs (job crafting), in general, and the relationship of the qualities and magnitude of the changes to the individual characteristics of: cognitive ability, self-image, perceived control, and readiness to change. This study adds to what is known about individuals at work, in any level of an organization, who knowingly make unsupervised changes in their jobs. This study adds to the research base of what is called job crafting as examined in the seminal work of Wrzesniewski and Dutton (Acad Manag Rev 26(2):179–201, 2001). In this study of 107 outside salespersons we find that more than 75% report engaging in job crafting in various forms. Positive, significant correlations are found between episodes of work modification and the variables of self-image, perceived control, and readiness to change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W., & Day, V. D. (1994). Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices test. Education and Psychological Measurement, 54, 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Kriener, G. E. (1999). How can you do it?: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Manage-ment Review, 24, 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, P., Tanner, C. A., & Chesla, C. A. (1996). Expertise in nursing practice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., & Nord, W. R. (1990). Meanings of occupational work: A collection of essays. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q-methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. C., & Sutton, R. I. (1998). Clients as a source of enjoyment on the job. In J. A. Wagner III (Ed.), Advances in qualitative organizational research. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, R. F., & Warner, M. (2002). A customer-driven model of job design:Towards a general theory. New Technology, Work & Employment, 17(1), 2–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, D. J., & Ganster, D. C. (1991). The effects of job demands and control on employee attendance and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1996). Justifying work: Occupational rhetorics as resources in restaurant kitchens. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 90–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (1998). Relational practice: A feminist reconstruction of work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7, 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Pluddemann, K. (1983). Readiness to change at work in East and West Germany. Zeitschrift fuer Sozialpsychologie, 24, 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Peterson, R. O., & Capwell, D. F. (1957). Job attitudes: Review of research and opinion. Pittsburgh: Psychological Service of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1992). The structure of work: Job design and roles. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (pp. 165–207). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, R. (1993). Untheorized dimensions of caring work: Caring as a structural practice and caring as a way of seeing. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 17(2), 1–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, B. C., Netemeyer, R. G., & Boles, J. S. (2002). Self-efficacy, competitiveness, and effort as antecedents of salesperson perform-ance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 22(4), 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, P. (2005). Enhancing human resources competitiveness using skill charting methods. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 13(1), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, P. (2006). Individual competitiveness and spontaneous changes in jobs. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 14(1), 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, Jr., H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, March, p. 118.

  • Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. M. (1986). The Advanced Raven’s Progressive Matrices: Normative data for an American university population and an expansion of the relationship with Spearman’s g. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. A. L. (1992). Autonomous workgroups: An evaluation at an industrial site. Human Relations, 45, 905–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmoker, M. (2004). Tipping point: From feckless reform to substantive instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(6), 424–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., & Boettger, R. D. (1990). Task revision: A form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tausky, C. (1995). The meanings of work. Research in the Sociology of Work, 5, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Wilson, J. M. (1991). Empowered teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstok, Z., & Enosh, G. (2004). Towards re-conceptualization of global self-image: Preliminary findings of the validity and reliability of a structured scale. Individual Differences Research, 2(1), 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. E., & Debebe, G. (2003). Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 93–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Lyons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyons, P. The Crafting of Jobs and Individual Differences. J Bus Psychol 23, 25–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9080-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9080-2

Keywords

Navigation