Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Porous protein-based scaffolds prepared through freezing as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Successful tissue engineering with the aid of a polymer scaffold offers the possibility to produce a larger construct and to mould the shape after the defect. We investigated the use of cryogelation to form protein-based scaffolds through different types of formation mechanisms; enzymatic crosslinking, chemical crosslinking, and non-covalent interactions. Casein was found to best suited for enzymatic crosslinking, gelatin for chemical crosslinking, and ovalbumin for non-covalent interactions. Fibroblasts and myoblasts were used to evaluate the cryogels for tissue engineering purposes. The stability of the cryogels over time in culture differed depending on formation mechanism. Casein cryogels showed best potential to be used in skeletal tissue engineering, whereas gelatin cryogels would be more suitable for compliable soft tissues even though it also seemed to support a myogenic phenotype. Ovalbumin cryogels would be better suited for elastic tissues with faster regeneration properties due to its faster degradation time. Overall, the cryogelation technique offers a fast, cheap and reproducible way of creating porous scaffolds from proteins without the use of toxic compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimizu K, Fujita H, Nagamori E. Alignment of skeletal muscle myoblasts and myotubes using linear micropatterned surfaces ground with abrasives. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103(3):631–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan W, et al. Tissue engineering of skeletal muscle. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(11):2781–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bian W, Bursac N. Engineered skeletal muscle tissue networks with controllable architecture. Biomaterials. 2009;30(7):1401–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao H, Zhou GQ. Development and progress of engineering of skeletal muscle tissue. Tissue Eng B Rev. 2009;15(3):319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Okano T, Matsuda T. Hybrid muscular tissues: preparation of skeletal muscle cell-incorporated collagen gels. Cell Transplant. 1997;6(2):109–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilmore KJ, et al. Skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation on polypyrrole substrates doped with extracellular matrix components. Biomaterials. 2009;30(29):5292–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomes ME, Malafaya PB and Reis RL. In: Hollander AP and Hatton PV, editors. Methodologies for processing biodegradable and natural origin scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue-engineering applications, in biopolymer methods in tissue engineering. Totowa: Humana Press Inc; 2004. p. 65–77.

  8. Lv S, et al. Designed biomaterials to mimic the mechanical properties of muscles. Nature. 2010;465(7294):69–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Langer R, Tirrell DA. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature. 2004;428(6982):487–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandl F, Sommer F, Goepferich A. Rational design of hydrogels for tissue engineering: impact of physical factors on cell behavior. Biomaterials. 2007;28(2):134–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Levy-Mishali M, Zoldan J, Levenberg S. Effect of scaffold stiffness on myoblast differentiation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(4):935–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bölgen N, et al. Three-dimensional ingrowth of bone cells within biodegradable cryogel scaffolds in bioreactors at different regimes. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(10):1743–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dainiak MB, et al. Gelatin-fibrinogen cryogel dermal matrices for wound repair: preparation, optimisation and in vitro study. Biomaterials. 2010;31(1):67–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh D, Nayak V, Kumar A. Proliferation of myoblast skeletal cells on three-dimensional supermacroporous cryogels. Int J Biol Sci. 2010;6(4):371–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh D, et al. Proliferation of chondrocytes on a 3-d modelled macroporous poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-gelatin cryogel. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2011;22(13):1733–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Srivastava A, Kumar A. Thermoresponsive poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) cryogels: synthesis and its biophysical evaluation for tissue engineering applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(11):2937–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lozinsky VI. Cryogels on the basis of natural and synthetic polymers: preparation, properties and application. Russ Chem Rev. 2002;71(6):559–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lozinsky VI, et al. Polymeric cryogels as promising materials of biotechnological interest. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21(10):445–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bölgen N, et al. Cryogelation for preparation of novel biodegradable tissue-engineering scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2007;18(9):1165–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Myllarinen P, Buchert J, Autio K. Effect of transglutaminase on rheological properties and microstructure of chemically acidified sodium caseinate gels. Int Dairy J. 2007;17(7):800–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nonaka M, et al. Sodium caseinate and skim milk gels formed by incubation with microbial transglutaminase. J Food Sci. 1992;57:1214–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jurga M, et al. The performance of laminin-containing cryogel scaffolds in neural tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(13):3423–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gawlik K, et al. Laminin alpha 1 chain reduces muscular dystrophy in laminin alpha 2 chain deficient mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(16):1775–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hager M, et al. Laminin {alpha}1 chain corrects male infertility caused by absence of laminin {alpha}2 chain. Am J Pathol. 2005;167(3):823–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mayer U. Integrins: Redundant or important players in skeletal muscle? J Biol Chem. 2003;278(17):14587–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolfe J, Bryant G, Koster KL. What is ‘unfreezable water’, how unfreezable is it and how much is there? Cryoletters. 2002;23:157–66.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Konstantinova NR, Lozinsky VI. Cryotropic gelation of ovalbumin solutions. Food Hydrocoll. 1997;11(2):113–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirsebom H, et al. Modulating the porosity of cryogels by influencing the nonfrozen liquid phase through the addition of inert solutes. Langmuir. 2010;26(20):16129–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kathuria N, et al. Synthesis and characterization of elastic and macroporous chitosan–gelatin cryogels for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(1):406–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Brien FJ, et al. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26(4):433–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Salem AK, et al. Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;61(2):212–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Laminins DM. Cell Tissue Res. 2010;339(1):259–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schuler F, Sorokin LM. Expression of laminin isoforms in mouse myogenic cells in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Sci. 1995;108:3795–805.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. González-Ramírez R, et al. Nuclear and nuclear envelope localization of dystrophin Dp71 and dystrophin-associated proteins (DAPs) in the C2C12 muscle cells: dAPs nuclear localization is modulated during myogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105(3):735–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yokoyama K, Nio N, Kikuchi Y. Properties and applications of microbial transglutaminase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64(4):447–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stein PE, et al. Crystal structure of ovalbumin as a model for the reactive centre of serpins. Nature. 1990;347(6288):99–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ren K, et al. Manipulation of the adhesive behaviour of skeletal muscle cells on soft and stiff polyelectrolyte multilayers. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(11):4238–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank R. Wallén for help with sample preparation and assistance at the scanning electron microscope. Ajinomoto, T. Sasaki and U. Mayer for gifts of reagents. This study was financially supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Muscle Biology Unit, Department of Experimental Medical Science, BMC B12, Lund University, 221 84, Lund, Sweden

    Linda Elowsson, Virginie Carmignac & Madeleine Durbeej

  2. Department of Biotechnology, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, 22100, Lund, Sweden

    Linda Elowsson, Harald Kirsebom & Bo Mattiasson

Authors
  1. Linda Elowsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harald Kirsebom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Virginie Carmignac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Madeleine Durbeej
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bo Mattiasson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Elowsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elowsson, L., Kirsebom, H., Carmignac, V. et al. Porous protein-based scaffolds prepared through freezing as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 23, 2489–2498 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4713-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4713-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation