Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sutures are classified into non-absorbable and absorbable, and mechanical properties of these materials vary by the composition. Knotting induces decrease in mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile and knot security properties depending on the type and caliber of sutures. Changes in properties after tensile loading were measured with absorbable sutures. Tensile properties such as maximum tensile load, elongation rate, stiffness and energy absorbed before breakage of seven kinds of surgical sutures were measured. Absorbable sutures were immersed in 37 °C Hank’s balanced salt solution up to 14 days under the tensile load of 100 g/thread, and properties were measured again. Knot was formed with surgeon’s knot method, and tensile properties were measured. Five specimens were tested for each condition. Values were analyzed with one- or two-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Maximum tensile load of seven sutures (caliber = 4-0) ranged from 10.0 N to 14.3 N. In non-absorbable sutures, the type of suture material influenced the tensile properties (P < 0.05). In absorbable sutures, the maximum tensile load after tensile loading decreased, which was significant in chromic catgut (CC). Knot security of seven sutures (caliber = 4-0) ranged from 8.7 N to 11.9 N. Type of non-absorbable suture influenced knot security (P < 0.05), and the synthetic monofilament materials showed a tendency to be untied easily. Since no single suture material possesses all of the requirements, proper type and caliber suture should be selected based on this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. J. SHAW, T. W. NEGUS and T. K. MELLOR, Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 34 (1996) 252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. L. MOY, A. LEE and A ZALKA, Am. Fam. Physician 44 (1991) 2123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. LABAGNARA Jr, Ear Nose Throat J. 74 (1995) 409

  4. D. GREENWALD, S. SHUMWAY, P. ALBEAR and L. GOTTLIEB, J. Surg. Res. 56 (1994) 372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. FREUDENBERG, S. REWERK, M. KAESS, C. WEISS, A. DORN-BEINECKE and S. POST, Eur. Surg. Res. 36 (2004) 376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. A. MUFTUOGLU, E. OZKAB and A. SAGLAM, Am. J. Surg. 188 (2004) 200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. G. GALLUP, T. E. NOLAN and R. P. SMITH, Obstet. Gynecol. 76 (1990) 872

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. TOMIHATA, M. SUZUKI and N. TOMIYA, Biomed. Mater. Eng. 15 (2005) 381

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. R. GRIGG, F. R. LIEWEHR, W. R. PATTON, T. B. BUXTON and J. C. MCPHERSON, J. Endod. 30 (2004) 649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. R. URBANIAK, P. N. SOUCACOS, R. S. ADELAAR, D. S. BRIGHT and L. A. WHITEHURST, Orthop. Clin. North Am. 8 (1977) 249

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. J. IVY, J. B. UNGER, J. HURT and D. MUKHERJEE, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 191 (2004) 1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. M. SUTCLIFFE and A. T. WINFREE, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 68 (2003) 016218

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. BIBBO, M. J. MILIA, R. M. GEHRMANN, D. V. PATEL and R. B. ANDERSON, Foot Ankle Int. 25 (2004) 712

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. J. ZDRAHALA, J. Biomater. Appl. 10 (1996) 309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. I. A. TRAIL, E. S. POWELL and J. NOBLE, J. Hand. Surg. [Br]. 14 (1989) 422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. T. M. LAWRENCE and T. R. DAVIS, J. Hand. Surg. [Am]. 30 (2005) 836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. STAMBOULIS, L. L. HENCH and A. R. BOCCACCINI, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 13 (2002) 843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. KRANZ, N. UBRICH, P. MAINCERT and R. BODMEIER, J. Pharm. Sci. 89 (2000) 1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. R. URBANIAK, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 163 (1982) 57

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (03-PJ1-PG1-CH09–0001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Keun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, JC., Lee, YK., Lim, BS. et al. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 18, 2363–2369 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3114-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3114-6

Keywords

Navigation