This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
Justin Kalef seems to disagree, but his argument (pp. 95–96) that there may be cases in which one could derive an ‘ought’ from an ‘is’ fails, because it assumes that the ‘is’ includes hidden normative statements.
The only brief reference to this notion can be found in the chapter by Russell Blackford, who makes the peculiar remark that the notion of technoscience “carries too much theological baggage” (p. 27).
References
Elliott, K. C. (2017). A tapestry of values: An introduction to values in science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hansson, S. O. (Ed.). (2015). The role of technology in science: Philosophical perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Katsumori, M. (2017). The crisis of Japanese academia: A brief report on recent developments. In W. Halffman & H. Radder (Eds.), International responses to the Academic Manifesto: Reports from 14 countries (Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, Special Report) (pp. 19–22). https://social-epistemology.com/2017/07/13/international-responses-to-the-academic-manifesto-reports-from-14-countries-willem-halffman-and-hans-radder/. Accessed 12 December 2018.
Kwa, C. (2011). Styles of knowing: A new history of science from ancient times to the present. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Pickering, A. (Ed.). (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Radder, H. (2001). Psychology, physicalism and real physics. Theory and Psychology,11(6), 775–786.
Radder, H. (2009). Science, technology and the science-technology relationship. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (pp. 65–91). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radder, H. Maarten Boudry and Massimo Pigliucci (eds.): Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism. J Gen Philos Sci 50, 593–597 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09456-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09456-8