Skip to main content
Log in

Ultimate Questions of Science and the Theory of System Relations

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Whenever an adequate theory is found in science, we will still be left with two questions: why this theory rather than some other theory, and how should this theory be interpreted? I argue that these questions can be answered by a theory of system relations. The basic idea is that fundamental characteristics of systems, viz. those arising from the general systemic nature of those systems, cannot be comprehended with the aid of discipline-specific methods. The systems theory required should commence with an analysis of the qualitatively different relations possible between systems, because it is precisely the nature of those relations that determines the basic structures of systems. That the theory of the fundamental system relations and their ontological and epistemological implications is indeed able to provide the answers sought is demonstrated in theoretical physics and Plessner’s analysis of the basic structures of plant, animal and human being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohm, D.: 1965, The Special Theory of Relativity, New York: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1980, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N.: 1958, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillouin, L.: 1962, Science and Information Theory, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bub, J.: 2000, ‘Quantum Mechanics as a Principle Theory’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1979, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 4: A World of Systems, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M.: 1988, Constructive Evolution, Origins and Development of Piaget ’ s Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. C.: 2001, Fokker en de Formanthese, M.Sc. thesis, University of Utrecht.

  • Einstein, A.: 1959, ‘Autobiographical Notes’, in P. A. Schilpp, Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, Vol. 1, New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebser, J.: 1991, The Everpresent Origin, Ohio: Ohio University Press; translation of Ursprung und Gegenwart, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt 1949/1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W.: 1971, Schritte über Grenzen, Munich: Piper Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer, M.: 1966, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer, M.: 1974, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective, New York : John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S.: 1968, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, translation H. V. and E. H. Hong, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. & Lachiéze-Rey, M.: 1999, The Quest for Unity. The Adventure of Physics, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneale, W. & Kneale, M.: 1968, The Development of Logic, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M. & Bunge, M.: 1997, Foundations of Biophilosophy, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malantschuk, G.: 1974, Kierkegaard ’ s Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin, T.: 1996, ‘On the Unification of Physics’, The Journal of Philosophy, XCIII(3), 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1950, Introduction á l ’ épistémologie génétique, tome II: La pensée physique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H.: 1975, Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch, 3rd ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavenga, G. J.: 1983, ‘The Fourth Structure of Physical Reality’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science/Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XIV/2, 354–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavenga, G. J.: 1991, Science and Liberation, Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 1985, ‘Peaceful Coexistence in Psychology’, in Human Agency and Language, Philosophical Papers I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B. C.: 1991, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, New York: Oxford Universiy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Haaften, W., Korthals, M. & Wren, T.: 1997, Philosophy of Development, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S.: 1993, Dreams of a Final Theory, London: Hutchinson Radius. 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S.: 1999, ‘A Designer Universe?’, The New York Review of Books, October 21, 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, M.: 1997, ‘ Complexity Theory and Systems Theory’, presented at the International Institute for General Systems Studies, January 9, San Marcos: Southwest Texas State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerben J. Stavenga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stavenga, G.J. Ultimate Questions of Science and the Theory of System Relations. J Gen Philos Sci 37, 111–137 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-006-0478-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-006-0478-0

Keywords

Navigation