Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early detection of cryostorage tank failure using a weight-based monitoring system

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the relationship between liquid nitrogen loss and temperature in cryostorage dewars and develop an early-warning alarm for impending tank failure.

Methods

Cryostorage dewars were placed on custom-engineered scales, and weight and temperature data were continuously monitored in the setting of slow, medium, and fast rate-loss of LN2 to simulate three scenarios of tank failure.

Results

LN2 Tank weights and temperatures were continuously monitored and recorded, with a calculated alarm trigger set at 10% weight loss and temperature of − 185 °C. With an intact tank, a 10% loss in LN2 occurred in 4.2–4.9 days. Warming to − 185 °C occurred in 37.8–43.7 days, over 30 days after the weight-based alarm was triggered. Full evaporation of LN2 required ~ 36.8 days. For the medium rate-loss simulation, a 10% loss in LN2 occurred in 0.8 h. Warming to − 185 °C occurred in 3.7–4.8 h, approximately 3 h after the weight-based alarm was triggered. For the fast rate-loss simulation, a 10% weight loss occurred within 15 s, and tanks were depleted in under 3 min. Tank temperatures began to rise immediately and at a relatively constant rate of 43.9 °C/h and 51.6 °C/h. Temperature alarms would have sounded within 0.37 and 0.06 h after the breech.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that a weight-based alarm system can detect tank failures prior to a temperature-based system. Weight-based monitoring could serve as a redundant safety mechanism for added protection of cryopreserved reproductive tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen J, Inge KL, Wiker SR, Wright G, Fehilly CB, Turner TGJ. Duration of storage of cryopreserved human embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1988;5:301–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glenister PH, Whittingham DG, Lyon MF. Further studies on the effect of radiation during the storage of frozen 8-cell mouse embryos at -196 degrees C. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:229–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldman KN, Kramer Y, Hodes-Wertz B, Noyes N, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes does not increase embryonic aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:662–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ueno S, Uchiyama K, Kuroda T, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K, Okimura T, et al. Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36:614–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bulletin A. ASRM statement on second report of storage tank failure. In: ASRM Office of Public Affairs Vol 20, 2018.

  6. Tomlinson M, Morroll D. Risks associated with cryopreservation: a survey of assisted conception units in the UK and Ireland. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008;11:33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pomeroy KO. Liquid nitrogen storage tank failure: can we improve the current system? Fertil Steril, www.fertilstertdialog.com, May 19, 2018.

  8. Schiewe MC, Freeman M, Whitney JB, VerMilyea MD, Jones A, Aguirre M et al. Comprehensive assessment of cryogenic storage risk and quality management concerns: best practice guidelines for ART labs. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35(12):in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1310-6.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of Columbia University Fertility Center for their assistance in conducting the trial.

Funding

ZW is partially supported through funding from the National Institutes of Health (grants HD068546 and U19CA179564). ZW is listed as an inventor on patent applications filed by Columbia University relating to this system.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zev Williams.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 17 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 9261 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 326 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michaelson, Z.P., Bondalapati, S.T., Amrane, S. et al. Early detection of cryostorage tank failure using a weight-based monitoring system. J Assist Reprod Genet 36, 655–660 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01402-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01402-3

Keywords

Navigation