Purpose : Chromosomal alterations are a major cause of clinically recognized abortions. So cryptic chromosomal rearrangements could be responsible for recurrent miscarriages.
Methods : The study was performed on 18 clinically normal couples who had four or more spontaneous abortions and whose karyotypes were found to be normal. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with specific probes of subtelomeric regions was used after optimizing the amount of probe.
Results : Only one subtelomeric translocation was detected between 2p and 3p chromosomes, in a female with seven miscarriages.
Conclusion : Subtelomeric rearrangements are infrequently related to multiple miscarriages. This kind of studies can be considered specially worthy when a couple have had not only abortions but also offspring with mental and physical anomalies. Thus, possible initial studies should focus on affected children or fetus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Dhont M: Recurrent miscarriage. Curr Women Health Rep 2003;3(5):361–366. Review
Brackley KJ, Kilby MD, Morton J, Whittle MJ, Knight SJ, Flint J: A case of recurrent congenital fetal anomalies associated with a familial subtelomeric translocation. Prenat Diagn 1999;19(6):570–574
Shaffer LG, Spikes AS, Macha M, Dunn R: Identification of a subtle chromosomal translocation in a family with recurrent miscarriages and a child with multiple congenital anomalies. A case report. J Reprod Med 1996;41(5):367–371
Cockwell AE, Jacobs PA, Beal SJ, Crolla JA: A study of cryptic terminal chromosome rearrangements in recurrent miscarriage couples detects unsuspected acrocentric pericentromeric abnormalities. Hum Genet 2003;112(3):298–302.
Yakut S, Berker-Karauzum S, Simsek M, Zorlu G, Trak B, Luleci G: Telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of couples with five or more recurrent miscarriages. Clin Genet 2002;61(1):26–31
Fan YS, Zhang Y: Subtelomeric translocations are not a frequent cause of recurrent miscarriages. Am J Med Genet 2002109(2):154
Jalal SM, Harwood AR, Sekhon GS, Pham Lorentz C, Ketterling RP, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Meyer RG, Ensenauer R, Anderson MH, Jr, Michels VV: Utility of subtelomeric fluorescent DNA probes for detection of chromosome anomalies in 425 patients. Genet Med 2003;5(1):28–34
Benzacken B, Carbillon L, Dupont C, Siffroi JP, Monier-Gavelle F, Bucourt M, Uzan M, Wolf JP: Lack of submicroscopic rearrangements involving telomeres in reproductive failures. Hum Reprod 2002;17(5):1154–1157
De Vries BB, White SM, Knight SJ, Regan R, Homfray T, Young ID, Super M, McKeown C, Splitt M, Quarrell OW, Trainer AH, Niermeijer MF, Malcolm S, Flint J, Hurst JA, Winter RM: Clinical studies on submicroscopic subtelomeric rearrangements: A checklist. J Med Genet 2001;38(3):145–150
De Vries BB, Winter R, Schinzel A, van Ravenswaaij-Arts C: Telomeres: A diagnosis at the end of the chromosomes. J Med Genet 2003;40(6):385–398
Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G: Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;57(12):15, 30
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by Grant No. SAF2001-0404 from the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología and FEDER (Fondos Europeo de Desarrollo Regional).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monfort, S., Martínez, F., Roselló, M. et al. A subtelomeric translocation apparently implied in multiple abortions. J Assist Reprod Genet 23, 97–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9033-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9033-5