Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of light on Synechocystis sp. and modelling of its growth rate as a response to average irradiance

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth rate and CO2 biofixation rate of a photosynthetic organism depend basically on the availability of light, all other factors being optimum. In dense cultures of cyanobacteria or micro-algae intended for biomass production, incident irradiance on the reactor surface is not the same as the intensity which is received by cells, as irradiance is attenuated by cell absorption and the self-shading effect. In a well-mixed, dense culture, only the average irradiance, I av, can be considered responsible for the photosynthetic response. In this study, the photosynthetic response of Synechocystis sp., estimated from its specific growth rate, was measured for each I av in batch cultures irradiated with different levels of external irradiance, I ext. The specific growth rate of Synechocystis sp. depends on I av, in accordance with the model proposed by Muller-Feuga (J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 236:1–13, 1999). A non-linear regression analysis estimated a maximum specific growth rate of 0.108 h−1, at an I av of 930 μmol photons·m−2·s−1. This reveals that Synechocystis sp. is a highly light-tolerant strain, suitable for outdoor cultures. Higher I av levels caused photoinhibition in batch cultures. Parameters obtained from the Muller-Feuga model show that the minimum irradiance needed to start growth mechanisms becomes less as light availability decreases, i.e. cells become more efficient in the use of light when it is scarce. This observation suggests that choosing for low-light adaptation may be a good strategy to improve productivity in dense cultures, where light is a limiting factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acién-Fernández FG, García-Camacho F, Sánchez-Pérez JA, Fernández-Sevilla JM, Molina-Grima E (1997) A model for light distribution and average solar irradiance inside outdoor tubular photobioreactors for the microalgal mass culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 55:701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acién-Fernández FG, García-Camacho F, Sánchez-Pérez JA, Fernández-Sevilla JM, Molina-Grima E (1998) Modeling of biomass productivity in tubular photobioreactors for microalgal cultures: effects of dilution rate, tube diameter and solar irradiance. Biotechnol Bioeng 58:605–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson BC, Rusch KA (2006) Investigation of the light dynamics and their impact on algal growth rate in a hydraulically integrated serial turbidostat algal reactor. Aquacultural Eng 35:122–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dermound D, Chaumont D, Thebault JM, Dauta A (1992) Modelling of growth of Porphyridium Cruentum in conncection with two independent factors; light and temperature. Bioresource Technol 42:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE (eds) (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington (1995)

  • Falkowski PG, Owens TG (1980) Light and shade adaptation: two strategies in marine phytoplankton. Plant Physiol 66:592–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallegos CL, Platt T, Harrison WG, Irwin B (1983) Photosynthetic parameters of arctic marine phytoplankton: vertical variations and time scales adaptation. Limnol Oceanogr 28(4):698–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Malea MC, Acién FG, Fernández JM, Cerón MC (2006) Continuous production of green cells of Haematococcus pluvialis: modeling of the irradiance effect. Enzyme Microb Tech 38:981–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmelen T, Oonk H (2006) Microalgae biofixation processes: applications and potential contributions to greenhouse gas mitigation options. http://www.ieaghg.org/index.php?/2009112028/biofixation-network.html. Accessed 22 November 2007.

  • Janssen M, Tramper J, Mur LR, Wilffels RH (2002) Enclosed outdoor photobioreactors: light regime, photosynthetic efficiency, scale up and future prospects. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon YC, Cho CW, Yun YS (2005) Measurement of microalgal photosynthetic activity depending on irradiance and quality. Biochem Eng J 27:127–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann JE, Myers J (1968) On pigments, growth and photosynthesis of Phaeodactylum tricornutum. J Phycol 4:349–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez L (2009) Eliminación de CO2 con microalgas autóctonas—CO2 biofixation with native microalgae. Dissertation. University of León

  • Martínez L, García AI, Morán A (2005) Isolation and selection of microalgae species for CO2 biofixation. J Biotechnol 135(S):122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis L, Menten ML (1913) Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem Z 4:334–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Grima E, García Camacho EF, Sánchez Pérez JA, Fernández Sevilla JM, Acién Fernández FG, Contreras Gómez A (1994) A mathematical model of microalgal growth in light-limited chemostat culture. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 61:167–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Grima, Fernández-Sevilla JM, Sánchez-Pérez JA, García-Camacho F (1996) A study on simultaneous photolimitation and photoinhibition in dense microalgal cultures taking into account incident and averaged irradiances. J Biotechnol 45:59–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Grima, Acién-Fernández FG, García Camacho F, Chisti Y (1999) Photobioreactors: light regime, mass transfer and scale up. J Biotechnol 70:231–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Grima E, Acién-Fernández FG, García-Camacho F, Camacho-Rubio F, Chisti Y (2000) Scale-up of tubular photobioreactors. J Appl Phycol 12:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Feuga A (1999) Growth as a function of rationing: a model applicable to fish and microalgae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 236:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono E, Cuello JL (2006) Feasibility assessment of microalgal carbon dioxide sequestration. Technology with photobioreactor and solar collector. Biosystems Eng 95:597–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond AE (1986) Microalgal culture. CRC Crit Rev Biotechnol 4:369–488

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spektorova LV, Nosova LP, Goronkova OI, Albitskaya ON, Filippovskij YuN (1986) High-density culture of marine microalgae—promising items for mariculture. II. Determination of optimal light regime for Chlorella sp. f. marina under high-density culture conditions. Aquaculture 55:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tredici MR, Chini-Zitelli G (1998) Efficiency of sunlight utilization: tubular versus flat photobioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 57:187–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vonshak A, Guy R (1992) Photoadaptation, photoinhibition and productivity in the blue green alga Spirulina platensis, grown outdoors. Plant Cell Environ 15:613–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun YS, Park JM (2003) Kinetic modeling of the light-dependent photosynthetic activity of the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris. Biotechnol Bioeng 83:303–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou N, Richmond A (2000) Light-path length and population density in photoacclimation of Nannochloropsis sp. (Eustigmatophyceae). J Appl Phycol 12:349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by IDOM International, Spain. We wish also to thank Dr. Vernet for the helpful comments provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Isabel García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martínez, L., Morán, A. & García, A.I. Effect of light on Synechocystis sp. and modelling of its growth rate as a response to average irradiance. J Appl Phycol 24, 125–134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-011-9658-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-011-9658-3

Keywords

Navigation