Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A plea to implement robustness into a breeding goal: poultry as an example

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combination of breeding for increased production and the intensification of housing conditions have resulted in increased occurrence of behavioral, physiological, and immunological disorders. These disorders affect health and welfare of production animals negatively. For future livestock systems, it is important to consider how to manage and breed production animals. In this paper, we will focus on selective breeding of laying hens. Selective breeding should not only be defined in terms of production, but should also include traits related to animal health and welfare. For this we like to introduce the concept of robustness. The concept of robustness includes individual traits of an animal that are relevant for health and welfare. Improving robustness by selective breeding will increase (or restore) the ability of animals to interact successfully with the environment and thereby to make them more able to adapt to an appropriate husbandry system. Application of robustness into a breeding goal will result in animals with improved health and welfare without affecting their integrity. Therefore, in order to be ethically acceptable, selective breeding in animal production should accept robustness as a breeding goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali A., K. M. Cheng (1985). Early Egg Production in Genetically Blind (rc/rc) Chickens in Comparison with Sighted (Rc+/rc) Controls. Poultry Science, 64, 789–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby M. C., P. Sandøe (2002). Philosophical Debate on the Nature of Well-Being: Implications for Animal Welfare. Animal Welfare, 11, 283–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby M. C., J. A. Mench, B. O. Hughes (2004). Poultry Behaviour and Welfare. Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop S. C., R. H. Fleming, H. A. McCormack, D. K. Flock, C. C. Whitehead (2000). Inheritance of Bone Characteristics Affecting Osteoporosis in Laying Hens. British Poultry Science, 41, 33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorse C. (1997). A Rebuttal on Health. In J. M. Humber, R. F. Almeder (eds.), What is Disease? (pp. 1–134). Totowa, New Jersey: Biomedical Ethics Reviews, Humana Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenhuis H., H. Bralten, M. G. B. Nieuwland, H. Parmentier (2002). Genetic Parameters for Antibody Response of Chickens to Sheep Red Blood Cells Based on a Selection Experiment. Poultry Science, 81, 309–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenkerk B., W. A. Brom, B. J. Van den Bergh (2002). Brave New Birds: The Use of ‹animal integrity’ in Animal Ethics. Hastings Center Report, 32, 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Brom F. W. A. (1997). Onherstelbaar Verbeterd: Biotechnologie Bij Dieren Als Moreel Probleem. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum & Comp. B.V

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom D. M. (1993). Assessing the Welfare of Modified or Treated Animals. Livestock Production Science, 36, 39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumstead N. (2003). Genetic Resistance and Transmission of Avian Bacteria and Viruses. In W. M. Muir, S. E. Aggrey (eds.), Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology (pp. 311–328). Oxon, UK: CAB International

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron N. D. (1997). Selection Indices and Production of Genetic Merit in Animal Breeding. Oxon, UK: CAB International

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen S. B., P. Sandøe (2000). Bioethics: Limits to the Interference With Life. Animal Reproduction Science, 60–61, 15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgaard T. S., S. Højsgaard, K. Skjødt, H. R. Juul-Madsen (2003). Differences in Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class Iα Gene Expression Between Marek’s Disease-Resistant and -Susceptible MHC Haplotypes. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 57, 135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. (2006). Genetic Engineering and the Integrity of Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 469–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan I. J. H., D. Fraser (1997). Understanding Animal Welfare. In M. C. Appleby, B. O. Hughes (eds.), Animal Welfare (pp. 19–31). Oxon, United Kingdom: CAB International

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen E. D., W. M. Muir, F. Teuscher, P. Bijma (2007). Genetic Improvement of Traits Affected by Interactions Among Individuals: Sib Selection Schemes. Genetics, 176, 489–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer D. S., T. F. C. Mackay (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics; fourth edition. Harlow, England: Pearson Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D., D. M. Weary, E. A. Pajor, B. N. Milligan (1997). A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical Concerns. Animal Welfare, 6, 187–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentle M. J. (1986). Beak Trimming in Poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 42, 268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grommers F. J., L. J. E. Rutgers, J. M. Wijsmuller (1995). Welzijn – Intrinsieke Waarde – Integriteit: Ontwikkeling in de Herwaardering van het Gedomesticeerde Dier (With a Summary in English). Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde, 120, 490–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson S. (2006). The Conceptualisation of Health and Disease in Veterinary Medicine. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 48, 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester P. Y. (2005). Impact of Science and Management on the Welfare of Egg Laying Strains of Hens. Poultry Science, 84, 687–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes B. O., P. E. Curtis (1997). Health and Disease. In M. C. Appleby, B. O. Hughes (eds.), Animal Welfare (pp. 109–125). Oxon, UK: CAB International

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A. L. (2000). Reproduction in the Female. In G. C. Whittow (ed.), Sturkie’s Avian Physiology (pp. 569–596). San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R. B., H. J. Blokhuis, G. Beuving (1995). Open-Field and Tonic Immobility Responses in Domestic Chicks of Two Genetic Lines Differing in Their Propensity to Feather Peck. British Poultry Science, 36, 525–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones R. B., P. M. Hocking, (1999). Genetic Selection for Poultry Behaviour: Big Bad Wolf or Friend in Need? Animal Welfare, 8, 343–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanis E., H. Van den Belt, A. Groen, J. Schakel, K. H. De Greef (2004). Breeding for Improved Welfare in Pigs: A Conceptual Framework and its Use in Practice. Animal Science, 78, 315–329

    Google Scholar 

  • King L. A. (2004). Ethics and Welfare of Animals Used in Education: An Overview. Animal Welfare, 13, S221–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano H. (2004). Biological Robustness. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 826–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knap P. W. (2005). Breeding Robust Pigs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 45, 763–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont S. J. (1998). Impact of Genetics on Disease Resistance. Poultry Science, 77, 1111–1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser C. E. (1996). Effects of Lighting on the Welfare of Domestic Poultry: A Review. Animal Welfare, 5, 341–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir W. M. (2003). Indirect Selection for Improvement of Animal Well-being. In W. M. Muir, S. E. Aggrey (eds.), Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology (pp. 247–255). Oxon, UK: CAB International

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberry R. C. (2004). Cannibalism. In G. C. Perry (ed.), Welfare of the Laying Hen (pp. 239–258). Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt L. (1987). On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer/Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt L. (2007). The Concept of Health and Illness Revisited. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10, 5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preisinger R. and D. K. Flock (2000). “Genetic Changes in Layer Breeding: Historical Trends and Future Prospects.” The challenge of genetic change in animal production, Proceedings of an Occasional Meeting organised by the British Society of Animal Science, Edinburgh, UK

  • Price E. O. (1999). Behavioral Development in Animals Undergoing Domestication. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65, 245–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauw W. M., E. Kanis, E. E. Noordhuizen-Stassen, F. J. Grommers (1998). Undesirable Side Effects of Selection for High Production Efficiency in Farm Animals: A Review. Livestock Production Science, 56, 15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg T. B., A. J. Buitenhuis, B. Ask, K. A. Uitdehaag, P. Koene, J. J. van der Poel, J. van Arendonk, H. Bovenhuis 2004). Genetic and Phenotypic Correlations Between Feather Pecking and Open-field Response in Laying Hens at Two Different Ages. Behavior Genetics, 34, 407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollin B. E. (1989). The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain and Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin B. E. (1995). The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals. Cambridge, NY, USA: Press syndicate

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan A. N. (1997). The Concept of Animal Welfare and Animal Suffering. In L. M. F. van Zutphen, M. Balls (eds.), Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics (pp. 157–168). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers B., R. Heeger (1999). Inherent Worth and Respect for Animal Integrity. In M. Dol, M. Fentener van Vlissingen, S. Kasanmoentalib, T. Visser, H. Zwart (eds.), Recognizing the Intrinsic Value of Animals (pp. 41–51). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers L. J. E. (1993). The Weal and Woe of Animals: Ethics of Veterinary Practice. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandøe P., B. L. Nielsen, L. G. Christensen, P. Sorensen (1999). Staying Good While Playing God – The Ethics of Breeding Farm Animals. Animal Welfare, 8, 313–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandøe P., S. B. Christiansen, M. C. Appleby (2003). Farm Animal Welfare: The Interaction of Ethical Questions and Animal Welfare Science. Animal Welfare, 12, 469–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory C. J. (1995). Feather Pecking and Cannibalism. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 51, 215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel H. S. (1995). Stress, Strain and Resistance. British Poultry Science, 36, 3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siwek M., B. Buitenhuis, S. Cornelissen, M. Nieuwland, E. F. Knol, R. Crooijmans, M. Groenen, H. Parmentier, J. van der Poel (2006). Detection of QTL for Innate: Non-specific Antibody Levels Binding LPS and LTA in Two Independent Populations of Laying Hens. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 30, 659–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen J. T., P. Sandøe, N. Halberg (2001). Animal Welfare As One Among Several Values to be Considered at Farm Level: The Idea of an Ethical Account for Livestock Farming. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, 30, 11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, F. R., F. Grommers, and J. M. G. Vorstenbosch “Animal welfare: a hierarchy of concepts.” Proceedings of the 1st congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics: preprints, Wageningen, the Netherlands (1999)

  • Star L., K. Frankena, B. Kemp, M. G. B. Nieuwland, H. J. Parmentier (2007a). Natural Humoral Immune Competence and Survival in Layers. Poultry Science, 86, 1090–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, L., M. G. B. Nieuwland, B. Kemp, and H. K. Parmentier (2007b), “Effect of single or combined climatic and hygienic stress on natural and specific immune competence in four layer lines.” Poultry Science, 86, pp. 1894–1903

  • Ten Napel J., F. B. Bianchi, M. Bestman (2006). Utilising Intrinsic Robustness in Agricultural Production Systems. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Transforum

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuyttens F. A. M. (2003). Measures of Developmental Instability as Integrated, a␣posteriori Indicators of Farm Animal Welfare: A Review. Animal Welfare, 12, 535–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitdehaag, K., H. Komen, T. B. Rodenburg, B. Kemp, and J. van Arendonk (2007), “The novel object test as predictor of feather damage in cage-housed Rhode Island Red and White Leghorn laying hens.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science, (in press)

  • Verhoog H. (1992). The Concept of Intrinsic Value and Transgenic Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 5, 147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorstenbosch J. M. G. (1993). The Concept of Integrity. Its Significance For the Ethical Discussion on Biotechnology and Animals. Livestock Production Science, 36, 109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead C. C., R. H. Fleming, R. J. Julian, P. Sørensen (2003). Skeletal Problems Associated with Selection for Increased Production. In W. M. Muir amd S. E. Aggrey (eds.), Poultry Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology (pp. 29–52). Oxon, UK: CAB International

    Google Scholar 

  • Yngvesson J., L. J. Keeling 2001). Body Size and Fluctuating Asymmetry in Relation to Cannibalistic Behaviour in Laying Hens. Animal Behaviour, 61, 609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, Wageningen, 6700 AH, The Netherlands

    L. Star, E. D. Ellen, K. Uitdehaag & F. W. A. Brom

Authors
  1. L. Star
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. D. Ellen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Uitdehaag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. W. A. Brom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. D. Ellen.

Additional information

L. Star, E. D. Ellen contributed equally to this work. Star belongs to the Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University, and the rest of the authors belong to the Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Star, L., Ellen, E.D., Uitdehaag, K. et al. A plea to implement robustness into a breeding goal: poultry as an example. J Agric Environ Ethics 21, 109–125 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9072-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9072-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation