Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Academic Misconduct Among Portuguese Economics and Business Undergraduate Students- A Comparative Analysis with Other Major Students

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to understand the demographic, personal and situational determining factors leading to academic misconduct among undergraduate students by comparatively analyzing the differences among Economics and Business students and other major students. Two thousand four hundred ninety-two undergraduate students from different Portuguese Public Universities answered a questionnaire regarding their propensity to commit academic fraud, 640 of whom were Economics and Business students. Results concluded that Economics and Business students can be distinguished from others regarding the likelihood of copying from the other Major students. Younger students admit more readily to the possibility of cheating than older students. Results indicate a greater probability of acceptance of dishonest practices outside the area of Economics and Management and a greater probability of condemnation of improper practices by students of Economics and Management. This indicates that students of Economics and Management are aware that their behavior is incorrect and unacceptable; peer-pressure and the learning process itself constitute the main justifications provided by Economics and Business students for their fraudulent actions. Implications for this practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, S., & Karns, L. (2009). Do business schools value the competencies that businesses value? The Journal of Education for Business, 84(6), 350–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J., Fuller, D., & Luckett, M. (1998). Academic integrity: behaviors, rates, and attitudes of business students toward cheating. Journal of Marketing Education, 20, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. R., Bacdayan, P., Kowalski, B. P. K., & Roy, H. (2005). Examining the impact of ethics training on business student values. Education and Training, 47(3), 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M., & Johnston, J. (1998). TV news in the classroom: what are adolescents learning? Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 73–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. S., Jr. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, W. F. (1975). Test information: an application of the economics of search. Journal of Economic Education, 7, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and its Control in College. Bureau of Applied Social Research. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M.-E. (2004). Walking our talk: business schools, legitimacy, and citizenship. Business & Society, 43(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, D. N., Caudill, S. B., & Gropper, D. M. (1992). Crime in the classroom: an economic analysis of undergraduate student cheating behavior. Journal of Economic Education, 23, 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C. (2010). A ten-step model for academic integrity: a positive approach for Business Schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, K. J., Davis, R., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2004). Academic integrity in the business school environment: I’ll get by with a little help from my friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C. (1941). Why students cheat. Journal of Higher Education, XII(8), 418–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, R. (2008). The impact of anti-intellectualism attitudes and academic self-efficacy on Business Student’s Perceptions of cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O’Brien, K., & Steffen, S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: an examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., & Weber, J. (1997). Influencing ethical development: exposing students to the AICPA code of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(8), 777–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Kiefhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Bridges, E. (2007). Problem-based management education: developing “managers for action”. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. M., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in humanities and engineering undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, B. (2007). Interview with linda trevino – Academy of Management Ethics Ombudsperson. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5(1), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., & Feldman, S. E. (1964). College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(4), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrabak, M., Vujaklija, A., Vodopivec, I., Hren, D., Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2004). Academic misconduct among medical students in a postcommunist country. Medical Education, 38(3), 276–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, R., & Eastman, J. K. (2006). The elderly and their attitudes toward the internet: the impact on internet use, purchase, and comparison shopping. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14, 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jendreck, M. P. (1989). Faculty reactions to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. (2001). College student cheating: the role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karebenick, S. A., & Srull, T. K. (1978). Effects of personality and situational variation in locus of control on cheating: determinance of the congruence effect. Journal of Personality, 46, 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. J., & Horn, L. C. (2007). Thoughts on ethics education in the business school environment: an interview with Dr. Jerry Trapnell, AACSB. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5(1), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkvliet, J. (1994). Cheating by economics students: a comparison of survey results. Journal of Economic Education, 25(2), 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: the relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. A., Levengurg, N. M., McKendall, M., & Mothersell, W. (2007). Cheating during the college years: How do business school students compare? Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, R. (2004). Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the “real world? Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, & Rakovski, C. C. (2006). A zero tolerance professor and student registration choices. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1999). Academic dishonesty among high school students. Adolescence, 34, 681–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). It Takes a Village: Academic Dishonesty and Educational opportunity. Liberal Education, 91, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1996). The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethics-related behavior in the workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: a qualitative investigation. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity. Research in Higher Education, 433, 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, T. B., & Stephens, J. M. (2007). Is cheating wrong? Students’ reasoning about academic dishonesty. In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 229–253). Burlington: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neubaum, D., Pagell, M., Drexler, J., Ryan, F. M. K., & Larson, E. (2009). Business education and its relationship to student personal moral philosophies and attitudes toward profits: an empirical response to critics. Academy of Management Learning and Education Journal, 8(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Arrnstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S., & Swift, C. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owunwanne, D., Rustagi, N., & Dada, R. (2010). Students perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in higher institutions. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students: findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phau, I., & Kea, G. (2007). Attitudes of university students toward business ethics: a cross-national investigation of Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premeaux, S. R. (2005). Undergraduate student perceptions regarding cheating: tier 1 versus tier 2 AACSB accredited business Schools’. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(4), 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvers, K., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1999). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger, D. A., & Jordan, A. E. (2005). The relations among religion, motivation, and college cheating: a natural experiment. Ethics & Behavior, 15(2), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, J. R., & Berl, R. L. (1997). Are we teaching ethics in marketing? A survey of students’ attitudes and perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1059–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, C. A., Carr, J. R., McCullough, S. M., Morgan, S. J., Oleson, T., & Resse, M. (2004). Gender, student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic dishonesty: Who reports in academic dishonesty cases? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. (1995). The severity of academic dishonesty: a comparison of faculty and student views. Psychological in the Schools, 32, 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, W., & Davis, E. (2004). Transforming Organizations: A five Dimensional Process, under review 3rd International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management ICSTM ‘04): Transforming Organizations to Achieve Sustainable Success, May 19–21, 2004. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, L. S., Davis, J. R., & Kroncke, C. O. (2009). Students’ Perceptions of business ethics: using cheating as a surrogate for business situations. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A., & Rocha, M. (2006). College cheating in Austria, Portugal, Romania and Spain: a comparative analysis. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(3), 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A., & Rocha, M. (2010). Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: an exploratory international assessment. Higher Education, 59, 663–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & McCabe, D. (1994). Meta-learning about business ethics: building honorable business school communities. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. S., & Hosek, W. R. (2003). Strategies for reducing academic dishonesty. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 21(1), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics and Management School, University of Minho, Campus Gualtar, Braga, Portugal

    Carla Freire

Authors
  1. Carla Freire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla Freire.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Sample scale Items
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freire, C. Academic Misconduct Among Portuguese Economics and Business Undergraduate Students- A Comparative Analysis with Other Major Students. J Acad Ethics 12, 43–63 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9199-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9199-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation