Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell fed with a dark fermentation effluent

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The organic matter consumption and hydrogen production rate were evaluated in a two-chamber microbial electrolysis cell (MEC). Three chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration levels (400, 600 and 1200 mg/L) were tested. The COD was composed of a mixture of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) present in the effluent of a dark fermentation process. The two levels of voltage studied were 350 and 550 mV. The performance of the MEC was evaluated using either an anionic (AEM) or cationic exchange membrane (CEM). The robustness of the MEC was tested using two dark fermentation effluents, one with VFAs and another containing 1100 mg/L glucose. The highest production rates (81 mL/L/day) were obtained with 550 mV, and 85 % COD consumption was attained. No considerable differences in the hydrogen production rate were observed when the COD was increased from 400 to 1200 mg/L using 550 mV. However, maximal hydrogen production rates were obtained with the lower COD concentration using 350 mV. Neither the employment of AEM and CEM nor the change from synthetic substrate to real substrate resulted in remarkable changes in MEC performance. The substrate containing glucose was more slowly degraded because glucose was first transformed into VFAs, and then the VFAs were consumed to produce hydrogen. In this case, methane and carbon dioxide were detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Show KY, Lee DJ, Tay JH, Lin CY, Chang JS (2012) Biohydrogen production: current perspectives and the way forward. Int J Hydrog Energy 30:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.109

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee HS, Vermaas WFJ, Rittmann BE (2010) Biological hydrogen production: prospects and challenges. Trends Biotechnol 28:262–271. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.01.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sleutels THJA, Ter Heijne A, Buisman CJN, Hamelers HVM (2012) Bioelectrochemical systems: an outlook for practical applications. ChemSusChem 5:1012–1019. doi:10.1002/cssc.201100732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wrana N, Sparling R, Cicek N, Levin DB (2010) Hydrogen gas production in a microbial electrolysis cell by electrohydrogenesis. J Clean Prod 18:S105–S111. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pant D, Singh A, Van Bogaert G, Olsen SI, Nigam PS, Diels L, Vanbroekhoven K (2012) Bioelectrochemical systems (BES) for sustainable energy production product recovery from organic wastes and industrial wastewaters. RSC Adv 2:1248–1263. doi:10.1039/C1RA00839K

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Logan BE, Call D, Cheng S, Hamelers HVM, Sleutels THJA, Jeremiasse AW, Rozendal RA (2008) Microbial electrolysis cells for high yield hydrogen gas production from organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 42:8639–8640. doi:10.1021/es801553z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harnisch F, Schröder U (2010) From MFC to MXC: chemical and biological cathodes and their potential for microbial bioelectrochemical systems. Chem Soc Rev 39:4433–4448. doi:10.1039/C003068F

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Logan BE (2007) Microbial fuel cells. Willey, Hoboken, p 127

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Lovley D, Phillips E (1988) Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1472–1480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Buitrón G, Carvajal C (2010) Biohydrogen production from tequila vinasses in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor: effect of initial substrate concentration, temperature and hydraulic retention time. Bioresour Technol 101:9071–9077. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernández-Mendoza CE, Buitrón G (2014) Suppression of methanogenic activity in anaerobic granular biomass for hydrogen production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:143–149. doi:10.1002/jctb.4143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y, Angelidaki I (2012) Innovative self-powered submersible microbial electrolysis cell (SMEC) for biohydrogen production from anaerobic reactors. Water Res 46:2727–2736. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gil-Carrera L, Escapa A, Moreno R, Morán A (2013) Reduced energy consumption during low strength domestic wastewater treatment in a semi-pilot tubular microbial electrolysis cell. J Environ Manag 122:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heidrich ES, Dolfing J, Scott K, Edwards SR, Jones C, Curtis TP (2013) Production of hydrogen from domestic wastewater in a pilot-scale microbial electrolysis cell. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:6979–6989. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4456-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun M, Sheng GP, Mu ZX, Liu XW, Chen YZ, Wang HL, Yu HQ (2009) Manipulating the hydrogen production from acetate in a microbial electrolysis cell–microbial fuel cell-coupled system. J Power Sources 191:338–343. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu L, Ren N, Xing D, Logan BE (2009) Hydrogen production with effluent from an ethanol-H2-coproducing fermentation reactor using a single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell. Biosens Bioelectron 24:3055–3060. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2009.03.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rozendal RA, Hamelers HVM, Euverink GJW, Metz SJ, Buisman CJN (2006) Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis. Int J Hydrog Ener 31:1632–1640. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.12.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang A, Sun D, Cao G, Wang H, Ren N, Wu WM, Logan BE (2011) Integrated hydrogen production process from cellulose by combining dark fermentation, microbial fuel cells, and a microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresour Technol 102:4137–4143. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruiz V, Ilhan ZE, Kang DW, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Buitrón G (2014) The source of inoculum plays a defining role in the development of MEC microbial consortia fed with acetic and propionic acid mixtures. J Biotechnol 182–183:11–18. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenin Babu M, Venkata Subhash G, Sarma PN, Venkata Mohan S (2013) Bio-electrolytic conversion of acidogenic effluents to biohydrogen: an integration strategy for higher substrate conversion and product recovery. Bioresour Technol 133:322–331. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu L, Xing D, Ren N, Logan BE (2012) Syntrophic interactions drive the hydrogen production from glucose at low temperature in microbial electrolysis cells. Bioresour Technol 124:68–76. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sleutels THJA, Hamelers HVM, Rozendal RA, Buisman CJN (2009) Ion transport resistance in microbial electrolysis cells with anion and cation exchange membranes. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:3612–3620. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim KY, Chae KJ, Choi MJ, Ajayi FF, Jang A, Kim CW, Kim IS (2011) Enhanced coulombic efficiency in glucose-fed microbial fuel cells by reducing metabolite electron losses using dual-anode electrodes. Bioresour Technol 102(5):4144–4149. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Selembo PA, Perez JM, Lloyd WA, Logan BE (2009) High hydrogen production from glycerol or glucose by electrohydrogenesis using microbial electrolysis cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:5373–5381. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the International Fund of the Instituto de Ingeniería-UNAM and DGAPA-UNAM (PAPIIT IT100113). This research is part of the master supported by the CONACYT scholarship. The research was supported by TÁMOP 4.2.2/A-11/1/KONV-2012-0071, which was financed by the European Union and the European Social Fund. The János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Research on Advanced Processes for Water Treatment, Unidad Académica Juriquilla, Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Blvd. Juriquilla 3001, 76230, Querétaro, Mexico

    Isaac Rivera & Germán Buitrón

  2. Research Institute on Bioengineering, Membrane Technology and Energetics, University of Pannonia, Egyetem ut 10, Veszprém, 8200, Hungary

    Péter Bakonyi, Nándor Nemestóthy & Katalin Bélafi-Bakó

Authors
  1. Isaac Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Germán Buitrón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Péter Bakonyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nándor Nemestóthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Katalin Bélafi-Bakó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germán Buitrón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivera, I., Buitrón, G., Bakonyi, P. et al. Hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell fed with a dark fermentation effluent. J Appl Electrochem 45, 1223–1229 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-015-0864-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-015-0864-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation