Abstract
This paper examines constructive play in the context of Waldorf and normative kindergartens in Israel. In conceptualizing the output of children’s construction, the current research relies upon the fields of problem-solving and technological thinking, using the design process model. The research results were based on a sample of 39 construction processes collected over the course of one year. A relatively high percentage of construction targets 86% geared towards socio-dramatic play was found at the Waldorf preschools compared to 35% at the normative preschools, indicating that the constructive play is a central feature at the Waldorf preschools and it can serve other types of play as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carlsson-Paige, N., McLaughlin, G., & Almon, J. (2015). Reading Instruction in Kindergarten: Little to Gain and Much to Lose. Published online by the Alliance for Childhood. http://www.allianceforchildhood.org/sites/allianceforchildhood.org/files.
Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 269–309.
Fleer, M. (1999). The science of technology: Young children working technologically. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9, 269–291.
Fleer, M. (2000). Working technologically: Investigations into How Young Children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 43–59.
Giro, J. (2006). The situated function–behaviour–structure framework, University of Sydney. Design Studies, 25, 373–391.
Goswami, U. (2011). Handbook of childhood cognitive development. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L., & Singer, D. (2009). A Mandate for playful learning in preschool: Presenting the evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Levy, S. L. (2013). Young children’s learning of water physics by constructing working systems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 537–566.
Marcinowski, E., & Campbell, J. (2016). Building on what you have learned Object construction skill during infancy predicts the comprehension of spatial relations words. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 28–41.
McCormack, T., & Atance, C. (2011). Planning in young children: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 31, 1–31.
Ministry of Education (2009). Curriculum of the official kindergarten. Department of Planning and Curriculum Development.
Ministry of Education. (2010). Educational activities in the kindergarten, guidelines for the educational staff. Jerusalem: Publications Division.
Mioduser, D. (1998). Framework for the study of cognitive and curricular issues of technological problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(2), 167–184.
Mioduser, D., & Kipperman, D. (2002). Evaluation/Modification Cycles in Junior High Students’ technological problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 123–138.
Mioduser, D., & Levy, S. L. (2010). Making sense by building sense: Kindergarten Children’s construction and understanding of adaptive robot behaviors. International Journal of Computer and Math Learning, 15, 99–127.
Mioduser, D., Levy, S. L., & Tails, V. (2009). Episodes to scripts to rules: concrete-abstractions in kindergarten children’s explanations of a robot’s behavior. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 15–36.
Ness, D., & Farenga, S. (2007). Knowledge under construction: The importance of play in developing children’s spatial and geometric thinking. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Pyle, A., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2014). Looking beyond the academic and developmental logics in kindergarten education: the role of Schwab’s commonplaces in classroom-based research. Early Child Development and Care, 184(12), 1960–1977.
Ramani, G., Zippert, E., Schweitzer, S., & Pan, S. (2014). Preschool children’s joint block building during a guided play activity. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 326–336.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research., 82(3), 330–348.
Rubin, K. (1982). Non-social play in preschoolers: necessary evil? Child Development, 53, 651–657.
Schweinhart, J., & Weikart, D. (1997). The high/scope pre- school curriculum comparison study through age 23. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 117–143.
Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sundqvist, P., & Nilsson, T. (2018). Technology education in preschool: providing opportunities for children to use artifacts and to create. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 29–51.
Verdine, B., Golinkoff, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. (2014a). Finding the missing piece: Blocks, puzzles, and shapes fuel school readiness. Trends in Neuroscience and Education., 3, 7–13.
Verdine, B., Golinkoff, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N., Filipowicz, A., & Chang, A. (2014b). Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers’ spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child Development, 85(3), 1062–1076.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kodsi, S. Constructive play in Waldorf and Normative preschools in Israel: technological thinking and design process during free play. Int J Technol Des Educ 32, 735–748 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09623-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09623-9