Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Engineering attitudes: an investigation of the effect of literature on student attitudes toward engineering

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth of STEM career occupations is outpacing the college enrollment of STEM students in the United States. There have been many research projects investigating this issue. There has not however been a study which investigated the impact non-fiction literature has on student interest in studying STEM (specifically engineering) content. The purpose of this study was to investigate the change of student attitudes toward engineering after reading literature involving non-fiction engineering centric narratives. The study used a modified version of the PATT (Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology) called the TEAS (Technology and Engineering Attitudes Scale) to measure student attitude change. The students were high-school aged students in the United States (ages: 15–17) who were enrolled in an English Literature course. The students completed the TEAS before and after reading and studying two engineering and technology centric non-fiction books (The Boy Who Harnessed The Wind and October Sky). The data revealed that student attitude after reading and studying the two books did not statistically change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bame, E., Dugger, W., Jr., de Vries, M., & McBee, J. (1993). Pupils’ attitudes toward technology—PATT-USA. Journal of Technology Studies, 19(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boser, R., Palmer, J., & Daugherty, M. (1998). Students attitudes toward technology in selected technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., & Rutland, A. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice toward the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consortium of Social Science Associations—COSSA. (2008). Enhancing diversity in science: A leadership retreat on the role of professional associations and scientific societies: A summary report. Washington, DC: COSSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. (2010). An investigation of middle school student interest, participation, and attitude toward technology and engineering. Masters Thesis. Brigham Young University.

  • Council, T. A. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology—CPST. (2007). Is US science and technology adrift? STEM Workforce Data Project: Report No. 8. Washington, DC: CPST.

  • Cunningham, C., & Knight, M. (2004). Draw an engineer test: Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT.

  • Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing elementary school students’ conceptions of engineering and technology. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland Oregon.

  • Fennema, E., & Sherman, A. (1976). Mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. (2011). Are we missing opportunities to encourage interest in STEM fields? Journal of Technology Education, 23(1), 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris Interactive. (2004). American perspectives on engineers and engineering. Poll conducted for the American Association of Engineering Societies. Final report, February 13, 2004.

  • Hirsch, L., Berliner-Heyman, S., Carpinelli, J., & Kimmel, H. (2012). AC 2012-3098: Introducing middle school students to engineering and the engineering design process. American Society for Engineering Education.

  • Hirsch, L., Carpinelli, J., Kimmer, H., Rockland, H., & Bloom, J. (2007). The differential effects of women only vs co-ed enrichment programs on middle school students’ attitude to science, mathematics, and engineering. In 2007 ASEE annual conference.

  • Hirsch, L., Gibbons, S., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., & Bloom, J. (2003). High school students’ attitudes to and knowledge about engineering. In 33rd ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Boulder, CO.

  • Hirsch, P. L., Shwon, B. L., Yarnoff, C., Anderson, J. C., Kelso, D. M., Olson, G. B., et al. (2001). Engineering design and communication: the case for interdisciplinary collaboration. Instructional Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4), 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, T. (1993). Adaptation and validation of a technology attitude scale for use by American teachers at the middle school level. Ph.D. diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  • Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–20.

  • LITEE. (2009). Auburn University. www.litee.org/site.

  • Lowell, B., & Regets, M. (2006). A half-century snapshot of the STEM workforce, 1950–2000. Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M., & Hand, B. (2010). A secondary reanalysis of student perceptions of nontraditional writing tasks over a ten-year period. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 518–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Educational Statistics—NCES. (2013). Bachelor’s, master’s, and doctor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by field of study: Selected years, 1970–71 through 2011–12. Retrieved from: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_318.20.asp.

  • Newby, T. (2012). The implementation of engineering design challenges on 4th grade students’ attitudes towards engineering, classroom climate, and writing ability. Masters Thesis: University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.

  • Pierce, R., Stacey, K., & Barkatsas, A. (2007). A scale for monitoring students’ attitude to learning mathematics with technology. Computers & Education, 28, 285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology—PCAST. (2010). Prepare and Inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) for America’s future. Washington, DC: PCAST.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology—PCAST. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: PCAST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raat, J. H., & de Vries, M. (1985). What do 13-year old students think about technology? The conception of and the attitude towards technology of 13-year old girls and boys. The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockland, R., Bloom, S., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., Hirsch, L., & Kimmel, H. (2010). Advancing the “E” in K-12 STEM education. The Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz, E., & Shafer, M. (2011). Impact of an engineering case study on a high school pre-engineering course. Journal of STEM Education, 12(3&4), 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEM Ed. Coalition. (2013). The Case for STEM Education as a National Priority: Good Jobs and American Competitiveness. Retrieved from: http://www.stemedcoalition.org/.

  • U.S. Department of Commerce—USDC. (2012). The competitiveness and innovative capacity of the United States. Washington, DC: USDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2012). Indirect contact through book reading: improving adolescents’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward immigrants. Psychology in the Schools, 49(2), 148–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vries de, M. J. (1997). Teaching technology for entrepreneurship and employment. An international PATT conference. Technology Teacher, 56(7), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse.gov. (2012). One decade, one million more STEM graduates. Retrieved from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/12/18/one-decade-one-million-more-stem-graduates.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Albert Wright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wright, G.A. Engineering attitudes: an investigation of the effect of literature on student attitudes toward engineering. Int J Technol Des Educ 28, 653–665 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9417-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9417-0

Keywords

Navigation