Abstract
Background
There is evidence that chemosensory dysfunctions, including smell and taste disorders, are common findings in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the underlying biological mechanisms and the role of inflammatory markers are still poorly understood.
Aim
To investigate the inflammatory biomarkers levels in patients with COVID-19 presenting chemosensory dysfunctions.
Methods
This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A systematic literature search was performed from January 1, 2020, to May 12, 2022. Observational studies that provided data on hematological, biochemical, infection-related indices and cellular immunity, and coagulation function in patients with COVID-19 experiencing smell and/or taste disorders were considered eligible. Effect sizes were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A negative effect size indicated that the inflammatory biomarker levels were lower among patients with chemosensory dysfunctions.
Results
Eleven studies were included. Patients with chemosensory disturbances had lower levels of leukocytes (SMD − 0.18, 95% CI − 0.35 to − 0.01, p = 0.04), lactate dehydrogenase (SMD − 0.45, 95% CI − 0.82 to − 0.09, p = 0.01), IL-6 (SMD − 0.25, 95% CI − 0.44 to − 0.06, p < 0.01), and C-reactive protein (SMD − 0.33, 95% CI − 0.58 to − 0.08, p < 0.01) than patients without chemosensory disturbances.
Conclusion
Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who have olfactory and gustatory disorders have a lower inflammatory response than patients who do not have chemosensory alterations. The presence of these symptoms may indicate a more favorable clinical course for COVID-19.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel RNA-enveloped virus responsible for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). There is evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein interacts with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor to mediate virus entrance into human host cells (Pierri 2020). The binding of SARS-CoV-2 S protein to human receptor cells, particularly in the kidneys, heart, respiratory, and gastrointestinal tract tissues, may result in a dysregulated immune response with increased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines associated with disease severity and risk of death (Martins-Filho et al. 2020).
The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are complex, and symptoms, such as fever, dry cough, headache, dyspnea, myalgia or arthralgia, fatigue, diarrhea, and vomiting, may occur (Huang et al. 2020; Struyf et al. 2020). Furthermore, it has been found that neurological complications, including chemosensory dysfunctions, are common findings in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. At least 85% of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 may have smell and taste disturbances, especially anosmia/hyposmia and ageusia/dysgeusia, respectively (Lechien et al. 2020).
Despite the strong association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and chemosensory dysfunction, the underlying biological mechanisms and role of inflammatory biomarkers remain unknown. It has been proposed that smell and taste disturbances in COVID-19 patients may be caused by either primary infection or secondary inflammation (Torabi et al. 2020; Boscolo-Rizzo et al. 2020; Cazzolla et al. 2020). However, studies have found that patients with COVID-19 and chemosensory dysfunctions have less lung involvement and require less intensive care unit (ICU), as well as lower neutrophil and lymphocyte counts and levels of inflammatory biomarkers than patients without chemosensory disorders (Sisó-Almirall et al. 2020; Yağmur et al. 2021; Tabernero et al. 2022). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarized the available evidence on the levels of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection experiencing chemosensory dysfunctions.
Methods
This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline (Moher et al. 2010). Institutional review board approval and informed consent were not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis.
Search strategy
Searches for studies were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 2020 to May 12, 2022. A gray literature search was conducted using Google Scholar (first 100 results) and the preprint server medRxiv. The search was limited to studies published in full-text versions, without language restriction. The reference lists of all eligible studies and reviews were also evaluated to identify additional studies for inclusion. The structured search strategies used for each database and gray literature were detailed in the supplementary file.
Study selection and eligibility criteria
Two independent investigators (E.G.M.M. and R.M.A.) screened the searched studies based on each paper’s title and abstract. Relevant studies were read in full and selected according to the eligibility criteria. Disagreements between the two reviewers were resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer (P.R.S.M.-F.).
Studies were considered eligible if they satisfied the following criteria: (i) they were an observational study; (ii) participants were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); (iii) they provided information on hematological (white blood cells [WBC], neutrophils, and lymphocytes), biochemical (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), infection-related indices and cellular immunity (C-reactive protein [CRP], interleukin[IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, ferritin, and procalcitonin), and coagulation function (D-dimer) in patients with COVID-19 and experiencing smell and/or taste disorders; (iv) comparison group included patients with COVID-19, but without chemosensory dysfunctions. Case series and studies with insufficient data on inflammatory biomarkers were excluded.
Data extraction and risk of bias assessment
Two authors (E.G.M.M. and P.R.M.F.) extracted the data from the all reports and cross-checked them for accuracy. Using a standardized data extraction sheet, the following information were extracted: country, eligible population, clinical characteristics, assessment of chemosensory dysfunction, and laboratory findings. Means and standard deviations (SD) of inflammatory biomarker levels were extracted from each study. Where data were not presented in tables or text, and authors could not be reached, data were extracted using WebPlotDigitizer (Web Plot Digitizer, V.3.11. Texas, USA: Ankit Rohatgi, 2017). If the means and SD were not directly reported in the publication, indirect methods of extracting estimates were used (Hozo et al. 2005; Wan et al. 2014).
The Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools) was used to grade the quality of each study.
Data synthesis and complementary analyses
A meta-analysis was conducted using the inverse-of-variance method and a fixed or random-effects model depending on the presence of heterogeneity. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified by the I2 index (Higgins and Thompson 2002) using the following interpretation: 0%, no between-study heterogeneity; < 50%, low heterogeneity; 50–75%, moderate heterogeneity; > 75%, high heterogeneity. In the presence of heterogeneity, we used the random-effects model, otherwise, the fixed-effects model was used.
Effect sizes were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cohen’s classification was used to interpret the magnitude of effect size as follows: SMD = 0.2, small; SMD = 0.5, moderate; SMD = 0.8, large (Cohen 1988). A negative effect size indicated that the inflammatory biomarker levels were lower among patients with chemosensory dysfunction. Although funnel plot asymmetry was not evaluated in this meta-analysis due to the limited number of included studies (Simmonds 2015), we reduced the potential for publication bias by planning a comprehensive search including gray literature without restrictions. All analyses were conducted using RStudio software (version 2021.09.1).
Results
Study selection
The initial search located 3208 references, 344 of which were collected from PubMed, 1591 from Embase, 238 from Web of Science, 100 from Google Scholar, 933 from medRxiv, and two via a hand-search. After screening titles and abstracts, 28 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 17 were excluded: three studies had a case series design; one study analyzed correlations between olfactory scores and serum levels of IL-6 in patients with COVID-19; two studies did not report the number of patients with and without anosmia; four studies did not provide useful information for meta-analysis regarding inflammatory biomarkers; one study evaluated patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome; three studies did not provide data on inflammatory biomarkers for patients with chemosensory disturbances; and three studies due to the comparison group. Finally, 11 studies (Vacchiano et al. 2020; Benkirane et al. 2020; Talavera et al. 2020; Sanli et al. 2021; Elibol and Baran 2021; Song et al. 2021; Kavaz et al. 2021; Yağmur et al. 2021; Bal et al. 2021; Sehanobish et al. 2021; Tan et al. 2022) were included in this systematic review (Fig. 1).
Study characteristics and risk of bias assessment
Studies were conducted in Turkey (Sanli et al. 2021; Elibol and Baran 2021; Kavaz et al. 2021; Yağmur et al. 2021; Bal et al. 2021), Morocco (Benkirane et al. 2020), China (Song et al. 2021), Spain (Talavera et al. 2020), Italy (Vacchiano et al. 2020), the United Kingdom (Tan et al. 2022), and the United States (Sehanobish et al. 2021). The assessment of chemosensory disturbances was heterogeneous between studies and included psychophysical tests or validated questionnaires (Benkirane et al. 2020; Sanli et al. 2021; Kavaz et al. 2021; Tan et al. 2022), electronic medical records or surveys of symptoms through a structured phone interview (Vacchiano et al. 2020; Talavera et al. 2020; Elibol and Baran 2021; Song et al. 2021; Yağmur et al. 2021; Sehanobish et al. 2021), and visual analog scale (Bal et al. 2021). In most studies, laboratory findings were collected at the time of hospital admission or at the time of SARS-CoV-2 testing (Table 1). The main limitations found in the included studies were the limited sample size, lack of dose–response analysis between inflammatory biomarkers and the severity of chemosensory disturbances, and unblinded analysis. There was potential for small sample bias and detection bias (Table 2).
Data synthesis
We included data from 3218 patients with COVID-19, of which 867 (26.9%) had olfactory or gustatory dysfunction and 2351 (73.1%) were controls. The results of meta-analysis showed that patients with chemosensory disturbances had lower levels of leukocytes (SMD − 0.18, 95% CI − 0.35 to − 0.01, p = 0.04), LDH (SMD − 0.45, 95% CI − 0.82 to − 0.09, p = 0.01), IL-6 (SMD − 0.25, 95% CI − 0.44 to − 0.06, p < 0.01), and CRP (SMD − 0.33, 95% CI − 0.58 to − 0.08, p < 0.01) than patients without chemosensory disturbances, but the magnitude of effect was considered small. There were no differences in neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, ferritin, procalcitonin, and D-dimer (Fig. 2).
Discussion
There is evidence that sensorineural dysfunctions may be associated with the presence of a wide range of viruses, including rhinovirus, coronavirus, parainfluenza virus, and Epstein–Barr virus (Suzuki et al. 2007), but the role of inflammation in the relationship between viral infections and olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions still needs to be better clarified due to its prognostic and therapeutic value. Recently, a systematic review showed that olfactory dysfunctions associated with viral infections are attributable to disruption at multiple levels of the olfactory pathway as a result of the cumulative effects of direct cell damage, inflammation, and cytokine effects (Lee et al. 2021). In addition, immunohistochemical analyses have found that patients with post-viral olfactory loss may present a decrease in the number of olfactory receptor cells and nerve bundles, as well as replacement of olfactory epithelium by respiratory or metaplastic epithelium (Yamagishi and Nakano 1989; Yamagishi et al. 1994).
Receptor-mediated signaling is a critical initial step in the infectious viral life cycle and plays a key regulatory role in a virus’s ability to infect a limited set of target cells and in viral pathogenesis (Grove and Marsh 2011). Regarding the coronavirus family, there is growing evidence that olfactory epithelial sustentacular cells express ACE2, TMRPSS2, and other genes implicated in coronavirus entry at levels comparable to those observed in lung cells (Brann et al. 2020). These findings may in part explain the clinically observable olfactory disturbances in patients with COVID-19 by direct damage to the olfactory epithelium (Han et al. 2020). In patients with persistent COVID-19 anosmia, it has been demonstrated the possibility of secondary inflammatory changes in olfactory clefts due to viral invasion, which could result in mucosa edema with subsequent narrowing of the olfactory cleft (Kandemirli et al. 2021). Moreover, the olfactory mucosa of COVID-19 patients may present viral RNA more than 30 days after initial diagnosis (Carmo et al. 2020), implying that long-term chemosensory dysfunction may be associated with the persistence of viral infection.
In the present meta-analysis, we found that COVID-19 patients with chemosensory dysfunctions have lower levels of leukocytes, LDH, IL-6, and CRP than those without chemosensory disturbances. Despite the cross-sectional nature of the included studies, most laboratory results were collected at the time of hospitalization or SARS-CoV-2 testing, indicating an early inflammatory pattern of patients with the disease. If the role of inflammation in the development of chemosensory dysfunctions in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is limited, our results may suggest that impairment of smell and taste is a prognostic marker for COVID-19 and may provide new insights for better management of these patients. In patients with a lower inflammatory response, smell and taste disorders appear to be associated with non-severe forms of COVID-19. Recent meta-analyses have shown lower rates of severe pneumonia, hospitalization, and death in COVID-19 patients with chemosensory disorders (Boscutti et al. 2021; Goshtasbi et al. 2022).
Several inflammatory biomarkers, particularly IL-6, CRP, ferritin, procalcitonin, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, have been associated with COVID-19 severity (Martins-Filho et al. 2020; Zeng et al. 2020; Ji et al. 2020). According to the literature, IL-6 is a potential predictor of severe COVID-19 development and plays an important role in the immunopathogenesis of cytokine storm (Sabaka et al. 2021). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that IL-6 can regulate the activity of olfactory neurons and glial cells, and its concentration in plasma and nasal mucous is higher in patients with postinfluenza-like hyposmia and hypogeusia (Henkin et al. 2013). Paradoxically, the current evidence suggests that COVID-19 patients experiencing chemosensory dysfunctions have lower levels of IL-6 and other inflammatory biomarkers.
Our review has several major limitations: (1) most individual studies had small sample sizes and used subjective evaluation to assess chemosensory disturbances; (2) there is a lack of evaluation on the association between the severity of chemosensory disturbances and the level of inflammation; and (3) studies did not provide data on the use of corticosteroids or other drugs that modulate Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Despite these limitations, our study was the first to synthesize inflammatory biomarker levels in patients with COVID-19 and chemosensory disturbances.
Conclusion
Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who have olfactory and gustatory disorders have a lower inflammatory response than patients who do not have chemosensory alterations. The presence of these symptoms may indicate a more favorable clinical course for COVID-19. Longitudinal studies are required to assess the behavior of inflammatory markers and the evolution of clinical outcomes for patients with chemosensory disorders.
Data availability
Data were directly retrieved from published original articles or by authors upon request by the reviewers.
References
Bal KK, Alagoz S, Ozdas T et al (2021) Loss of smell in COVID-19 patients: new biomarkers. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02892-3
Benkirane H, Heikel J, Laamiri FZ et al (2020) Study of clinical and biological characteristics of moroccan Covid-19 patients with and without olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction. Front Physiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.595005
Boscolo-Rizzo P, Borsetto D, Fabbris C et al (2020) Evolution of altered sense of smell or taste in patients with mildly symptomatic COVID-19. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg 146:729. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1379
Boscutti A, Delvecchio G, Pigoni A et al (2021) Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review. Brain, Behav Immun - Heal 15:100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100268
Brann DH, Tsukahara T, Weinreb C et al (2020) Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated anosmia. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc5801
Carmo A, Pereira-Vaz J, Mota V et al (2020) Clearance and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in patients with COVID-19. J Med Virol 92:2227–2231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26103
Cazzolla AP, Lovero R, Lo Muzio L et al (2020) Taste and Smell Disorders in COVID-19 Patients: Role of Interleukin-6. ACS Chem Neurosci 11:2774–2781. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00447
Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
Elibol E, Baran H (2021) The relation between serum D-dimer, ferritin and vitamin D levels, and dysgeusia symptoms, in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. J Laryngol Otol 135:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120002765
Goshtasbi K, Pang J, Lehrich BM et al (2022) Association between olfactory dysfunction and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Neck Surg 166:388–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211017442
Grove J, Marsh M (2011) The cell biology of receptor-mediated virus entry. J Cell Biol 195:1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201108131
Han AY, Mukdad L, Long JL, Lopez IA (2020) Anosmia in COVID-19: Mechanisms and Significance. Chem Senses 45:423–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaa040
Henkin RI, Schmidt L, Velicu I (2013) Interleukin 6 in Hyposmia. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg 139:728. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3392
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X et al (2020) Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
Ji P, Zhu J, Zhong Z et al (2020) Association of elevated inflammatory markers and severe COVID-19. Medicine (baltimore) 99:e23315. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023315
Kandemirli SG, Altundag A, Yildirim D et al (2021) Olfactory bulb MRI and paranasal sinus CT findings in persistent COVID-19 anosmia. Acad Radiol 28:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.006
Kavaz E, Tahir E, Bilek HC et al (2021) Clinical significance of smell and taste dysfunction and other related factors in COVID-19. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 278:2327–2336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06503-9
Lechien JR, Chiesa-Estomba CM, De Siati DR et al (2020) Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 277:2251–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05965-1
Lee JC, Nallani R, Cass L et al (2021) A Systematic Review of the Neuropathologic Findings of Post-Viral Olfactory Dysfunction: Implications and Novel Insight for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Rhinol Allergy 35:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1945892420957853
Martins-Filho PR, Tavares CSS, Santos VS (2020) Factors associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19. A quantitative evidence synthesis of clinical and laboratory data. Eur J Intern Med 76:97–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2020.04.043
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8:336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Pierri CL (2020) SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: flexibility as a new target for fighting infection. Signal Transduct Target Ther 5:254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00369-3
Sabaka P, Koščálová A, Straka I et al (2021) Role of interleukin 6 as a predictive factor for a severe course of Covid-19: retrospective data analysis of patients from a long-term care facility during Covid-19 outbreak. BMC Infect Dis 21:308. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-05945-8
Sanli DET, Altundag A, Kandemirli SG et al (2021) Relationship between disease severity and serum IL-6 levels in COVID-19 anosmia. Am J Otolaryngol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102796
Sehanobish E, Barbi M, Fong V et al (2021) COVID-19-induced anosmia and ageusia are associated with younger age and lower blood eosinophil counts. Am J Rhinol Allergy 35:830–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924211004800
Simmonds M (2015) Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots. Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0004-8
Sisó-Almirall A, Kostov B, Mas-Heredia M et al (2020) Prognostic factors in Spanish COVID-19 patients: a case series from Barcelona. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237960
Song J, Deng Y, Wang H et al (2021) Self-reported taste and smell disorders in patients with COVID-19: distinct features in China. Curr Med Sci 41:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-021-2312-7
Struyf T, Deeks JJ, Dinnes J et al (2020) Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19 disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013665
Suzuki M, Saito K, Min W-P et al (2007) Identification of viruses in patients with postviral olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope 117:272–277. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000249922.37381.1e
Tabernero E, Ruiz LA, España PP et al (2022) COVID-19 in young and middle-aged adults: predictors of poor outcome and clinical differences. Infection 50:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01684-9
Talavera B, García-Azorín D, Martínez-Pías E et al (2020) Anosmia is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in COVID-19. J Neurol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.117163
Tan HQM, Pendolino AL, Andrews PJ, Choi D (2022) Prevalence of olfactory dysfunction and quality of life in hospitalised patients 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cohort study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054598
Torabi A, Mohammadbagheri E, Akbari Dilmaghani N et al (2020) Proinflammatory cytokines in the olfactory mucosa result in COVID-19 induced anosmia. ACS Chem Neurosci 11:1909–1913. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00249
Vacchiano V, Riguzzi P, Volpi L et al (2020) Early neurological manifestations of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Neurol Sci 41:2029–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04525-z
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Yağmur AR, Akbal Çufalı Ş, Aypak A et al (2021) Correlation of olfactory dysfunction with lung involvement and severity of COVID-19. Irish J Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02732-x
Yamagishi M, Nakano Y (1989) Immunohistochemical studies of olfactory mucosa in patients with olfactory disturbances. Am J Rhinol 3:205–210. https://doi.org/10.2500/105065889782009615
Yamagishi M, Fujiwara M, Nakamura H (1994) Olfactory mucosal findings and clinical course in patients with olfactory disorders following upper respiratory viral infection. Rhinology 32:113–118
Zeng F, Huang Y, Guo Y et al (2020) Association of inflammatory markers with the severity of COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis 96:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.055
Funding
This research was partially funded by coordination of superior level staff improvement—CAPES—“Finance Code 001” and “Edital CAPES/FAPITEC n.11/2016—PROEF (Process 88881.157445/2017-01)”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EGMM, SJAV, PLS, DMT, LJQJ, JSSQ, and PRMF: conceptualization and methodology. EGMM and RMA: study selection and risk of bias assessment. EGMM and PRMF: data extraction and statistical analysis. EGMM, SJAV, RMA, and PRMF: original draft preparation. PLS, DMT, LJQJ, and JSSQ: manuscript review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no competing interest. All authors have approved the manuscript for submission.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
de Melo, E.G.M., Andrade, R.M., de Abreu de Vasconcellos, S.J. et al. Association between chemosensory dysfunctions and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflammopharmacol 30, 2079–2087 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-022-01066-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-022-01066-z