Abstract
This paper explores the dynamics of the production of global knowledge by an international knowledge organization, in this case the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Based on previous notions of international boundary organizations, the idea of international knowledge organizations emphasizes the knowledge generation function of such organizations rather than their convening function. Using the case of controversial Kyoto Protocol biotic carbon sequestration policies, I argue that boundary work and uncertainty management are the essential dynamics in the successful construction of global knowledge by international knowledge organizations. This uncertainty management occurs in a manner broadly, although not completely, in conformance with the institutional preferences of powerful policy actors. Global knowledge can legitimate and help refine global policies, but the process of its construction must be iterative and transparent if it is to be credible for global environmental governance over the long-term.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Agrawala (1998) ArticleTitle‘Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’ Climatic Change 39 621–642 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005312331477
S. Agrawala (1999) ArticleTitle‘Early Science-policy Interactions in Climate Change: Lessons From the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases’. Global Environmental Change 9 157–169 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00003-5
R. Birdsey (2004) ArticleTitle‘Data Gaps for Monitoring Forest Carbon in the United States: An Inventory Perspective’ in Environmental Management 33 IssueID(Supplement 1) 1–8 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00267-003-3070-y
Dieter, M. and P. Elsasser (2004), ‘Economic Efficiency and Competitiveness of Forest GHG Sequestration Projects in Germany’, in Bundesforschunganstalt fur Forst – und Holzwirtschaft, Arbeitsbericht des Instituts fur Okonomie, 11
S. Ebbin (2004) ArticleTitle‘Introduction’ International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4 105–109
P. M. Fearnside W. F. Laurance (2004) ArticleTitle‘Tropical Deforestation and Greenhouse Gas Emissions’ in Ecological Applications 14 IssueID4 982–986
C. Fogel (2004) ‘The Local, the Global and the Kyoto Protocol’ S. Jasanoff M. Long-Martello (Eds) Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance MIT Press Cambridge, MA 103–125
T. Gieryn (1985) ‘Boundaries of Science’ Jasanoff Sheila G. Markle J. Petersen T. Pinch (Eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies Sage Press London 393–493
D. Guston (2001) ArticleTitle‘Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction’. Science, Technology and Human Values 26 IssueID4 399–408
InstitutionalAuthorNameIPCC (1996) Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Summary for Policymakers Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
InstitutionalAuthorNameIPCC (1999) Government Review of Draft IPCC Special Report on Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry, October–December IPCC Technical Support Unit Washington, D.C.
InstitutionalAuthorNameIPCC (2000a) Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
IPCC, (2000b), Government Comments on IPCC Special Report Summary for Policymakers, IPCC-XVI/Doc. 2, Add.1.Washington DC.: IPCC Technical Support Unit
InstitutionalAuthorNameIPCC (2003a) Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry IPCC Technical Support Unit Hayama, Kanagawa
InstitutionalAuthorNameIPCC (2003b) Definitions and Methodological Options to Inventory Emissions from Direct Human-Induced Degradation of Forests and Devegetation of Other Vegetation Types IPCC Technical Support Unit Hayama, Kanagawa
L. Lebel A. Contreras S. Pasong P. Garden (2004) ArticleTitle‘Nobody Knows Best: Alternative Perspectives on Forest Management and Governance in Southeast Asia’ International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4 111–127
K. Litfin (1994) Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation Columbia University Press New York
Locatelli, B. and L. Pedroni (forthcoming), ‘Will Simplified Modalities and Procedures Make More More Small-Scale Projects Viable Under the Clean Development Mechanism?’ in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies
C. Miller (2001) ArticleTitle‘Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime’ in Science, Technology and Human Values 26 IssueID4 478–500
Nilsson, S., A. Shvidenko, V. Stolbovoi, M. Gluck, M. Jonas and M. Obersteiner (2000), Full Carbon Acount for Russia, Interim Report IR-00-021. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 181 pages
Norwatch (2000) ‘CO2 lonialism: Norwegian Tree Plantations, Carbon Credits and Land Conflicts in Uganda’ Norwatch Oslo
Norwatch (2000a) ‘Carbon Upsets: Norwegian Carbon Plantations in Tanzania’ Norwatch Oslo
K. Richards K. Anderssen (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Leaky Sink: Persistent Obstacles to a Forest Carbon Sequestration Program Based on Individual Projects’ Climate Policy 1 IssueID1 41–54 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1469-3062(00)00003-6
K. Robertson I. Loza-Balbuena J. Ford-Robertson (2004) ArticleTitle‘Monitoring and Economic Factors Affecting the Economic Viability of Afforestation for Carbon Sequestration Projects’ Environmental Science and Policy 7 IssueID6 465–475 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.envsci.2004.07.003
S. Shackley B. Wynne (1996) ArticleTitle‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’ Science, Technology and Human Values 21 IssueID3 275–302
S. Star J. Griesemer (1989) ArticleTitle‘Institutional Ecology, “Translations,” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39’ in it Social Studies of Science 19 397–420
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1998–2000), ‘FCCC/SBSTA/1998/CRP.3,’ ‘FCCC/CP/1998/MISC.1.Add.1,’ ‘FCCC/CP/1998/INF.4,’ ‘FCCC/CP/1998/MISC.1,’ ‘FCCC/SBSTA/2000/MISC.6/Add.1,’ ‘FCCC/CP/2001/13.Add.1,’ ‘IPCC letter No. 12327/M/IPCC/SRLFC, May 27 1999.’ Bonn: Germany. United Nations printers
V. M. Walsh (2004) Global Institutions and Social Knowledge: Generating Research at the Scripps Institution and the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commissions, 1900–1990s MIT Press Cambridge, MA
Watson, R. (1998), Presentation by the Chairman of the IPCC to SBSTA 9, November 2, 1998. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5 pp
O. A. Young L. Agrawal L. King P. San A. Underdal M. Wasson (1999) IDGEC Science Plan. Rep. 9 IHDP Bonn 100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fogel, C. Biotic Carbon Sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol: The Construction of Global Knowledge by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Int Environ Agreements 5, 191–210 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-1749-7
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-1749-7