This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bloomfield L. (1933). Language. New York, New York, Holt
Bresnan J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In: Halle M., Bresnan J., Miller G.A. (eds) Linguistic theory and psychological reality. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Cardona G. (1965). On translating and formalizing Pāṇinian Rules. Journal of the Oriental Institute (Baroda) 14: 306–314
Cardona G. (1976). Some features of Pāṇinian derivations. In: Parret H. (eds) History of linguistic thought and contemporary linguistics. De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, pp 136-158 (Foundations of Communication).
Cardona G. (1988). Pāṇini: his work and its traditions. Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, India
Chomsky N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton and Company, The Hague, The Netherlands (Janua Linguarum: Series Minor n. 4).
Chomsky N. (1980). Lectures on government and binding. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherland
Deshpande M. (1980). Evolution of Syntactic Theory in Sanskrit Grammar: Syntax of the Sanskrit Infinitive -tumUN. Karoma Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Deshpande M. (eds) (1999). Indian linguistic studies: festschrift in honour of George Cardona. Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, India
DiSciullo A.-M., Williams E. (1987). On the definition of word. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Filliozat P.-S. (1988). Grammaire sanskrite Pânineénne. Picard, Paris, France
Gillon B.S. (1993). Bhaṛthari’s solution to the problem of asamartha compounds. Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques 47(1): 117–133
Gillon, B. S. (1999). Bhartṛhari’s rule for unexpressed kārakas: the problem of control in Classical Sanskrit. In: Deshpande (Ed.) (1999) pp. 93–111.
Harris Z. (1946). From Morpheme to Utterance. Language 22: 161–183
Hockett C.F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word 10: 210–231
Joshi, S. D., & Roodbergen, J. A. F. (Ed.) (tr) (1980). Patañjali’s Vyākaraṅa Mahābhāṣya Vibhaktyahnika. Poona, India: University of Poona (No. 12, Class C).
Kiparsky P. (1982). Some theoretical problems in Pāṇini’s grammar. Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Poona, India
Levi J.N. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. Academic Press, New York, New York
Ogawa H. (2005). Process and language: A study of the Mahābhāṣya ad A1.3.1 bhūvādayo bhātavaḥ. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi, India
McCawley J.D. (1968). Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 4: 243–269
Pollard C., Sag I. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois
Sharma, Rama Nath (tr) (1987). The Aṣṭādhyāy \(\overline {\rm i}\) of Pāṇini. 6 vols. Delhi, India: Munishiram Manoharlal.
Shefts B. (1961). Grammatical method in Pāṇini: Its treatment of sanskrit present stems. American Oriental Society, New Haven, USA (American Oriental Series: Essay 1).
Staal, J. F. (1963). Review of Shefts 1961. Language, 39(3), 483–488. Reprinted In: Staal (Ed) (1988) pp. 232–237.
Staal, J. F. (1965). Context sensitive rules in Pāṇini. Foundations of Language, 1, 63–72. Reprinted In: Staal (Ed.) (1988) pp. 171–180.
Staal J.F. (1975). The concept of metalanguage and its Indian background. Journal of Indian Philosophy 3: 315–354
Staal J.F. (eds) (1988) Universals: Studies in Indian logic and linguistics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois
Van Nooten B. (1969). Pāṇini’s theory of verbal meaning. Foundations of Language 5: 242–255
Wells R.S. (1947). Immediate Constituents. Language 23: 81–117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillon, B.S. Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī and Linguistic Theory. J Indian Philos 35, 445–468 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-007-9027-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-007-9027-3