Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Communicating Support: Examining Perceived Organizational Support among Faculty Members with Differing Appointment Types

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the changing landscape of postsecondary faculty employment, institutions benefit from understanding how organizational policies and behaviors affects the faculty’s perception of organizational support. Using data from faculty members, including those with contingent and part-time appointments, at a single institution in the western United States, this study examined how the faculty’s perceptions of structures and behaviors at the departmental, college, and campus levels affect their perception of organizational support. Results suggest that part-time faculty members are significantly less likely to feel supported; however, as their perceptions of being valued by college and senior administrators increase, so do their perceptions of support. Findings suggest avenues for organizational leaders to promote commitment among all faculty members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M. W. (1992). Communication and organizational commitment: Perceived organizational support as a mediating factor. Communication Quarterly, 40, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2012). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G. (2000). The deterioration of the academic estate: International patterns of academic work. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The changing academic workplace: Comparative perspectives (pp. 1–23). Boston, MA: Center for International Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Professors. (2017). Trends in the academic labor force, 1975–2015. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/Academic_Labor_Force_Trends_1975-2015.pdf

  • Azziz, R. (2014). A looming challenge in higher education: Our changing student. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-ricardo-azziz/a-looming-challenge-higher-education_b_4855108.html

  • Ball, J. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior at Catholic institutions of higher education: Effects of organizational commitment, interpersonal-and system-level trust. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, U.S.A.). Retrieved from https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/4945/

  • Barnhardt, C. L., & Phillips, C. W. (2018). At the margins of university work: The influence of campus climate and part-time faculty status on academic values. Journal of Academic Freedom, 9, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W. H. (1992). The four cultures of the academy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 89–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchers, A., & Teahen, J. (2001). Organizational commitment of part-time and distance faculty. AMCIS 2001 Proceedings, 41. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2001/41

  • Brown, C. M., & Dancy, E. T. (2010). Predominantly white institutions. In K. Lomotey (Ed.), Encyclopedia of African American education (pp. 524–527). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971966.n193

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, L. L. (2008). Organizational commitment and generational differences in nursing faculty (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.A.). Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds/2784

  • Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, C. J., & Dee, J. R. (2006). Greener pastures: Faculty turnover intent in urban public universities. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 776–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, D. M., & Kirshstein, R. (2014). Labor intensive or labor expensive? Changing staffing and compensation patterns in higher education. Issue brief. Delta Cost Project at American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from https://deltacostproject.org/sites/default/files/products/DeltaCostAIR_Staffing_Brief_2_3_14.pdf

  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, V. L. (2011). The isolation of online adjunct faculty and its impact on their performance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 62–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. Washington, DC: APA Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.

  • Eisenberger, R., Cotterell, N., & Marvel, J. (1987). Reciprocation ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 743–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, D. L. (2010). Factors that predict organizational commitment for full-time and part-time faculty in community colleges across North Carolina. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. AAT 3425899).

  • Fjortoft, N. (1993, May). Factors predicting commitment to the university. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Gappa, J. M., Austin, A. E., & Trice, A. G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education's strategic imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, S. (1997). A path model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing, L., & Zhang, D. (2014). Does organizational commitment help to promote university faculty’s performance and effectiveness? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2013). Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54, 571–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2011). Understanding non-tenure track faculty: New assumptions and theories for conceptualizing behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 1419–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2014). Governance as a catalyst for policy change: Creating a contingent faculty friendly academy. Educational Policy, 28, 425–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., DePaola, T., & Scott, D. (2019). The gig academy: Mapping labor in the neoliberal university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, L. G., Kelly-Reid, J. E., & Ginder, S. A. (2010). Employees in postsecondary institutions, fall 2009, and salaries of full-time instructional faculty, 2009–10 (NCES 2011–150). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011150.pdf

  • Lawrence, J., Ott, M., & Bell, A. (2012). Faculty organizational commitment and citizenship. Research in Higher Education, 53, 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. W., & Gappa, J. M. (2002). Part-time faculty: Competent and committed. New Directions for Community Colleges, 118, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. S., & Shaker, G. G. (2011). The hybrid and dualistic identity of full-time non-tenure-track faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 1461–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. C., & Joseph, T. A. (2008). Are all part-time faculty underemployed? The influence of faculty status preference on satisfaction and commitment. Higher Education, 55, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, J. N. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Projections of education statistics to 2021 (40th ed.). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013008.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Y., & Finaly-Neumann, E. (1990). The reward-support framework and faculty commitment to their university. Research in Higher Education, 31, 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M., & Cisneros, J. (2015). Understanding the changing faculty workforce in higher education: A comparison of non-tenure track and tenure line experiences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(90). Retrieved from https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1934

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1998). Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizatonal support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos Laanan, F. (Ed.). (2006). Editors notes. Students in transitions: Trends and issues. New Directions for Student Services, 114, 1–6.

  • Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Sheets, J. K. E., Barnhardt, C. L., Phillips, C. W., & Valdes, P. H. (2018). The impact of faculty work-life factors on faculty service morale. Journal of Faculty Development, 32(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2008). How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organization Science, 19, 807–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelin, J. R. (2001). Campus and community: A world turned inside out? The Review of Higher Education, 25, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbach, P. D. (2007). Faculty cultures and college teaching. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 263–317). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45, 139–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pullias Center for Higher Education, University of Southern California, 3470 Trousdale Parkway, WPH 701D, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-9008, USA

    K. C. Culver

  2. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA

    Ryan L. Young

  3. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

    Cassie L. Barnhardt

Authors
  1. K. C. Culver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan L. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cassie L. Barnhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. C. Culver.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Employment and demographic information for faculty population and survey respondents
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Culver, K.C., Young, R.L. & Barnhardt, C.L. Communicating Support: Examining Perceived Organizational Support among Faculty Members with Differing Appointment Types. Innov High Educ 45, 299–315 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09503-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09503-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation