Abstract
This article extends a line of research on intentional change at public metropolitan research universities that aims to improve undergraduate student success (as measured by graduation and retention rates) while improving access (as measured by Pell and minority rates). Some of the issues that have emerged from this line of research involve the dynamics of various competing goals, such as (a) student success and student access and (b) student success with access and research preeminence. This article uses performance data to examine the challenges of improving success with access and research preeminence, simultaneously, at public metropolitan research universities. A case study offers an illustration of the challenges and clarifies the unintended consequences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of University Professors (2014). Contingent appointments and the academic profession. Retrieved from h ttps://www.aaup.org/report/contingent-appointments-and-academic-profession. Accessed 7 September 2019
Baldwin, R. G., & Chronister, J. (2001). Teaching without tenure: Policies and practices for a new era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bowen, W. G., & Tobin, E. M. (2015). Locus of authority: The evolution of faculty roles in the governance of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Christensen, C. M., & Horn, M. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. In Kindle version. London, United Kingdom: John Murray.
DePaola, T., & Kezar, A. (2018). The changing face of employment at research universities. In H. A. Garcia, J. McNaughton, & K. Nehls (Eds.), Hidden and visible: The role and impact of contingency faculty in higher education (pp. 83–96). New Directions for Institutional Research, No.176. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Finkelstein, M. J., Conley, V. M., & Schuster, J. H. (2016). The faculty factor: Reassessing the American academy in a turbulent era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
Fitzgerald, F. S. (1945). The crack up (E. Wilson, Ed.). New York, NY: New Directions.
Florida Board of Governors, Employee Files (2019, April 12). Retrieved from https://accountability.fiu.edu/faculty-staff.htl
Florida International University (2018, October 17).Official university policy, graduate faculty and dissertation advisor status. Policy Number 380.0448. Retrieved from https://policies.fiu.edu/files/766.pdf
Gappa, J. M., Austin, A. E., & Trice, A. G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education’s strategic imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
Garcia, H. A., McNaughton, J., & Nehls, K. (Eds.) (2018). Hidden and visible: The role and impact of contingency faculty in higher education. New directions for institutional research, no.176. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–179.
Glenn, S. S. (1989). Verbal behavior and cultural practices. Behavior Analysis and Social Action, 7, 10–15.
Glenn, S. S. (1991). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Relations among behavioral, cultural, and biological evolution. In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), The behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 39–73). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Glenn, S. S. (2003). Operant contingencies and the origin of cultures. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 223–242). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 131–151.
Glenn, S. S. (2010). Metacontingencies, selection and OBM: Comments on “emergence and metacontingency”. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 79–85.
Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. E. (2004). Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 89–106.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research (2018). Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Retrieved from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu. Accessed 12 April 2019
Integrated Postsecondary Educational Data System (2019, April 12). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds
Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (Eds.). (2016). Envisioning the faculty for the twenty-first century: Moving to a mission-oriented and learner-centered model. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Levin, J., & Shaker, G. (2011). The hybrid and dualistic identity of full-time non-tenure track faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 1461–1484.
Malott, M. E. (1999). Creating lasting organizational change. Performance Improvement, 38, 33–36.
Malott, M. E. (2001). Putting the horse before the cart: Process-driven change. In L. Hayes, R. Fleming, J. Austin, & R. Houmanfar (Eds.), Organizational change (pp. 297–320). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Malott, M. E. (2003). Paradox of organizational change: Engineering organizations with behavioral systems analysis. Reno, NV: Context Press.
Malott, M. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 31–56.
Malott, M. E., & Salas Martinez, W. (2006). Addressing organizational complexity: A behavioural systems analysis application to higher education. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 559–570.
Ott, M., & Cisneros, J. (2015). Understanding the changing faculty workforce in higher education: A comparison of full-time non-tenure track and tenure line experiences. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 23(90), 1–25.
Robertson, D. L. (1991a). An evolutionary response to adult learners: The urban small college. Innovative Higher Education, 16, 39–48.
Robertson, D. L. (1991b). Gender differences in the academic progress of adult undergraduates: Patterns and policy implications. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 490–496.
Robertson, D. L. (1992). Urban postsecondary systems: Higher education's infrastructure in American cities. Review of Higher Education, 15, 325–339.
Robertson, D. L. (2003). Integrity in learner-centered teaching. In C. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy (Vol. 21, pp. 196–211). Bolton, MA: Anker.
Robertson, D. L. (2005). Generative paradox in learner-centered college teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 181–194.
Robertson, D. L. (2017). Making change, lessons learned: A primer for change-agents. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
Robertson, D. L. (2019). Performance perspectives on undergraduate student success at public metropolitan research universities. Innovative Higher Education, 44, 87–101.
Robertson, D. L., & Pelaez, M. (2016). Behavior analytic concepts and change in a large metropolitan research university: The graduation success initiative. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 36, 123–153.
Robertson, D. L., & Pelaez, M. (2018). Rules, rule-governed behavior, and organizational change in a large metropolitan research university. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 23, 1–13.
Saunders, D. B. (2015). Resisting excellence: Challenging neoliberal ideology in postsecondary education. Journal for Critical Educational Policy Studies, 13, 391–413.
Saunders, D. B., & Ramírez, G. B. (2017). Against “teaching excellence”: Ideology, commodification, and enabling the neoliberalization of postsecondary education. Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 396–407.
Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.
St. John, E. P., Daun-Barnett, N., & Moronski-Chapman, K. M. (2018). Public policy and higher education: Reframing strategies for preparation, access, and college success (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Steger, M. B., & Roy, R. K. (2010). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tkachenko, O., & Louis, K. S. (2017). Re-shaping the faculty: Emergence and development of “permanent-contingent” roles through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory. International Journal of Higher Education, 6, 140–152.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robertson, D.L. Student Success, Research Preeminence, and Unintended Consequences at Public Metropolitan Research Universities. Innov High Educ 45, 35–49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-09481-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-09481-x