Skip to main content
Log in

GlobalEX: Creating a Collaborative Initiative for Enhancing Cross Cultural Engagement

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

GlobalEx is a co-curricular program designed to enhance cross-cultural engagement at the undergraduate level at Texas Christian University. This student-designed and student-led project arose from recognition of a need to integrate the experiences of international students and domestic students, and it uses a three-step model (EXplore, EXchange, and EXtend) to allow students to discover more about themselves and each other. For its first-year participants, who carry out intercultural inquiry in teams during the fall semester, this experiential program culminates in a version of performative storytelling to share publically what each team has learned. For upper-level students, who are selected to continue as leaders after finishing the program, GlobalEX provides the opportunity to mentor new participants into the program and into intercultural learning opportunities. In this article we report on the innovative aspects of the program’s design and the use of integrated assessment to continually refine the GlobalEX model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amsteus, M. N. (2014). The validity of divergent grounded theory method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. K. (2009). In the cave of making: Thoughts on third space. In K. Ikas & G. Wagner (Eds.), Communicating in the third space (pp. ix–xv). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brustein, W. I. (2007). The global campus: Challenges and opportunities for higher education in North America. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 382–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (2016). Universities as spaces for engaging the other: A pedagogy of encounter for intercultural and interreligious education. International Review of Education., 62, 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hightower, C. (2017). Intercultural competence at Texas Christian University. In D. K. Deardorff & L. A. Arasaratnam-Smith (Eds.), Intercultural competence in higher education: International approaches, assessment and application (pp. 192–196). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In T. Gladwin & W. C. Sturtevant (Eds.), Anthropology and human behavior (pp. 13–53). Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikas, K., & Wagner, G. (2009). Introduction. In K. Ikas & G. Wagner (Eds.), Communicating in the third space (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, K. (2007). Promoting intercultural learning in a multicultural university: Ideals and realities. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 749–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otten, M. (2003). Intercultural learning and diversity in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7, 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, R. M. (1993). Trainer competencies for international and intercultural programs. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 169–199). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapiro, B. (2009). Negotiating a third space in the classroom. Pedagogy: Critical approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 9, 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H. (2011). Axioms for a theory of intercultural communication competence. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (13th ed. pp. 424–433). Boston, MA: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.

  • Turner, Y. (2009). “Knowing me, knowing you”—Is there nothing we can do? Pedagogic challenges in using group work to create an intercultural learning space. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12, 240–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, D. M. (2017). Global learning: Shifting from an option to a priority. In I. Nair & M. Henning (Eds.), Models of global learning (pp. v–vi). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges & Universities.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine M. Wehlburg.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

figure a

Appendix B

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wehlburg, C.M., Robbins, S.R., Daugherty, R.C. et al. GlobalEX: Creating a Collaborative Initiative for Enhancing Cross Cultural Engagement. Innov High Educ 44, 453–467 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-09479-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-09479-5

Keywords

Navigation