Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Collective Power of We: Breaking Barriers in Community Engagement through Dialogue

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How we engage the community within our institutions, from higher education to social services, requires consistent reconceptualization. Many fields benefit from engaging the community; yet research around practical methods for engagement is limited. This study describes the process of using nominal group technique as a practical method for both community and academic members to discuss Community Based Participatory Research. Participants included faculty, staff, students, and community member stakeholders of a medical institution during a community engagement themed conference. The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of using the nominal group technique for community and academic members to discuss the principles of Community Based Participatory Research. Through this discussion a significant change in the research paradigm was addressed by focusing on the importance of dialogue in order to have an impact on health disparities. This study serves to illustrate a method for bringing community and academic members together around discussion of a complex topic, while simultaneously identifying general perceptions around Community Based Participatory Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, S. M., Maurana, C., Nelson, D., Meister, T., Neu Young, S., & Lucey, P. (2016). Opening the black box: Conceptualizing community engagement from 109 community-academic partnership programs. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 10, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. M., & Maurana, C. A. (2000). Reaching out to the underserved: A successful volunteer program. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 439–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. M., Nelson, D., Kissack, A., Franco, Z., Whittle, J., Kotchen, T.,… Brandenburg, T. (2015). Towards building a bridge between community engagement in research (CEnR) and comparative effectiveness research (CER). Clinical and Translational Science, 8, 160–165.

  • Ahmed, S. M., & Palermo, A. S. (2010). Community engagement in research: Frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1380–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J. M., & Murningham, J. K. (1984). The nominal group technique: Expanding the basic procedure and underlying assumptions. Group & Organization Studies, 9, 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belone, L., Lucero, J. E., Duran, B., Tafoya, G., Baker, E. A., Chan, D., … Wallerstein, N. (2016). Community-based participatory research conceptual model: Community partner consultation and face validity. Qualitative Health Research, 26(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314557084

  • Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36, 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calleson, D. C., Jordan, C., & Seifer, S. D. (2005). Community-engaged scholarship: Is faculty work in communities a true academic enterprise? Academic Medicine, 80, 317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chale, A., Avila, E., & Avila, Y. (2016). Maintaining engaged scholarship in challenging times: Experiences working with veteran medical providers in greater Los Angeles. Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 8(4), 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. Y. (2016). Understanding the purpose of higher education: Examining the social and economic benefits for completing a college degree. Journal of Education Policy, Planning and Administration, 6(5), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, J. D., Ritchie, J. R. B., & Zaichkowsky, J. (1980). The nominal group technique: Its potential for consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 308–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, G. B., Loken, K. V., & Mogstad, M. (2014). Peer effects in program participation. American Economic Review, 104, 2049–2074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dankwa-Mullan, I., Rhee, K. B., Stoff, D. M., Reineke Pohlhaus, J., Sy, F. S., Stinson, N., & Ruffin, J. (2010). Moving toward paradigm-shifting research in health disparities through translational, transformational, and transdisciplinary approaches. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix, H. C., Lee, D., Stewart, K., & Greene, P. G. (2013). Engagement of community health workers in the research enterprise: A survey of organizations and the research roles given CHWs. Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 5(1), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg-Freeman, C., Kass, N., Gielen, A., Tracey, P., Bates-Hopkins, B., & Farfel, M. (2010). Faculty beliefs, perceptions, and level of community involvement in their research: A survey at one urban academic institution. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(4), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, J. K., Ellis, L., & Merritt, M. W. (2014). Why we need community engagement in medical research. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 62, 851–855. https://doi.org/10.1097/JIM.00000000000000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., van der Brink, H. M., & Groot, W. (2011). College education and social trust: An evidence-based study on the causal mechanisms. Social Indicators Research, 104, 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9477-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunton, J. E., & Gold, A. (May, 2010). A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussion. The Accounting Review, 85, 911–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B. A., Parker, E. A., Rowe, Z., Salvatore, A., Minkler, M., López, J., ..., & Halstead, S. (2005). Community-based participatory research: Lessons learned from the centers for children's environmental health and disease prevention research. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113, 1463–1471. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7675

  • Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitts, J. (2000). Mobilizing in black boxes: Social networks and participation in social movement organizations. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5, 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, S. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3, 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krska, J., & Mackridge, A. J. (2014). Involving the public and other stakeholders in development and evaluation of a community pharmacy alcohol screening and brief advice service. Public Health, 128, 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, C. A., Sherbourne, C., Tang, L., Belin, T., Williams, P., Young-Brinn, A., ... Wells, K. B. (2016). The impact of community engagement on health, social, and utilization outcomes in depressed, impoverished populations: Secondary findings from a randomized trial. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 29, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150306

  • McMillan, S. S., Kelly, F., Sav, A., Kendall, E., King, M. A., Whitty, J. A., & Wheeler, A. J. (2014). Using nominal group technique: How to analyse across multiple groups. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 14, 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-014-0121-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, S. S., King, M., & Tully, M. P. (2016). How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38, 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener, J. L., Yaggy, S., Lyn, M., Warburton, S., Champagne, M., Black, M., … Dzau, V. J. (2008). Improving the health of the community: Duke’s experience with community engagement. Academic Medicine, 83, 408–413.

  • Munro, C., & Neilson, L. (2004). Effective community engagement: Workbook and tools (version 2). Melbourne, Vic., Australia: Victorian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtadha, K. (2016). Urban university community engagement: Questions of commitment to democratic ethics and social change. The Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 8(1), 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A., Arnold, K., Friedman, C., & Sandman, S. (2016). Nominal group technique: An accessible and interactive method for conceptualizing the sexual self-advocacy of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Qualitative Social Work, 15, 175–189.

  • Park, S., & Kim, S. (2014). The degree of community engagement: Empirical research in Baltimore city. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 4, 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaley, J. (2000). Embracing civic responsibility. Retrieved June 22, 2017 from http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcehighered/123

  • Sikder, S. K., Asadzadeh, A., Kuusaana, E. D., Mallick, B., & Koetter, T. (2015). Stakeholders participation for urban climate resilience: A case of informal settlements regularization in Khulna City, Bangladesh. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 7, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute Office of Community Engagement (2012). A quick start guide to conducting community-engaged research. Retrieved from http://oprs.usc.edu/files/2013/01/Comm_Engaged_Research_Guide.pdf

  • Spears Johnson, C. R., Kraemer Diaz, A. E., & Arcury, T. A. (2016). What does it mean for something to be “scientific”? Community understandings of science, educational attainment, and community representation among a sample of 25 CBPR projects. Health Education & Behavior, 44, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198116651038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J., & Siqueira, C. E. (2009). Popular arts and education in community-based participatory research (CBPR): On the subtle craft of developing and enhancing channels for clear conversations among CBPR partners. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 19, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.2190/NS.19.4.b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szilagyi, P. G., Shone, L. P., Dozier, A. M., Newton, G. L., Green, T., & Bennett, N. M. (2014). Evaluating community engagement in an academic medical center. Academic Medicine, 89(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tendulkar, S. A., Chu, J., Opp, J., Geller, A., DiGirolamo, A., Gandelman, E., et al. (2011). A funding initiative for community-based participatory research: Lessons from the Harvard catalyst seed grants. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 5, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2011.0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997). Principles of community engagement (1st ed.). Atlanta GA: CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement.

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). Principles of community engagement (2nd ed.). Atlanta GA: CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.014

  • Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., … Whitener, L. (2004). Community-based Participatory Research: Assessing the evidence. Report/technology assessment no. 99. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publication.

  • Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109, 5–42.

  • Wendel, M. L., Garney, W. R., Castle, B. F., & Ingram, M. (2018). Critical reflexivity of communities on their experience to improve population health. Perspectives from the Social Sciences, 108, 896–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, A., Wiseman, J., & Muirhead, B. (2006). University-community engagement in Australia; Practice, policy and public good. Education, Citizenship, and Social Justice, 1, 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197906064675

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA

    Jessica L. De Santis

  2. Office of Community Engagement, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

    Sarah P. O’Connor

  3. Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, Milwaukee, WI, USA

    Kathleen Pritchard

  4. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

    Zeno E. Franco, Syed M. Ahmed & David A. Nelson

Authors
  1. Jessica L. De Santis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah P. O’Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathleen Pritchard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zeno E. Franco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Syed M. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David A. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica L. De Santis.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Santis, J.L., O’Connor, S.P., Pritchard, K. et al. The Collective Power of We: Breaking Barriers in Community Engagement through Dialogue. Innov High Educ 44, 149–160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9454-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9454-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation