Abstract
In this article we report on our examination of the challenges faced by four successful and long-standing national STEM reform communities. Drawing primarily on interview data from a large-scale, multi-year study informed by literature on “communities of practice” (CoPs) (Wenger et al. 2002), we describe five categories of challenges faced by the communities and the solutions employed to overcome them in order to sustain themselves and meet their goals. We chose to focus on these large and dispersed CoPs because, although on-campus CoPs have received some scholarly attention, no research has been conducted on national or regional CoPs. Based on our findings, we conclude that the solutions used to address these challenges reflected a meta-theme of flexibility in matters of design, leadership, and decision-making that contributed to the communities’ success and longevity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allee, V. (2000). Knowledge networks and communities of practice. OD Practitioner Online, 32(4), 4–13.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011). Vision and change in biology education. Washington, DC: American Association for Advancement of Science. Retrieved from http://visionandchange.org/files/2013/11/aaas-VISchange-web1113.pdf
Association of American Medical Colleges-Howard Hughes Medical Institute Committee (2012). Behavioral and social science foundations for future physicians. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
Austin, A. (2011). Promoting evidence based change in undergraduate science education. Washington, DC: National Academies.
Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 185–207.
Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Daly, A. J. (2010). Mapping the terrain: Social network theory and educational change. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education, status report for the National Academies Research Council Board of Science Education Retrieved February 16, 2017 from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/bose/index.htm
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415.
Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521–522.
Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 952–984.
Kezar, A. (2011). What is the best way to achieve broader reach of improved practices in higher education? Innovative Higher Education, 36, 235–247.
Kezar, A. (2013). How colleges change. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Lave, J. (1988). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. (1992). Networks in organizations (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Seymour, E. (2002). Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education, 86, 79–105.
Stuckey, B. (2004). Making the most of the good advice: Meta-analysis of guidelines for establishing an internet-mediated community of practice. Proceedings of the IADIS conference of web-based communities. Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS.
Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change: New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Philadelphia, PA: Open Press.
Valente, T. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernstein-Sierra, S., Kezar, A. Identifying and Overcoming Challenges in STEM Reform: a Study of four National STEM Reform Communities of Practice. Innov High Educ 42, 407–420 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9395-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9395-x