Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the Effectiveness of a Learning Outcomes Assessment Program: a Four Frames Perspective

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of learning outcomes at the program level is essential to evaluate whether students are achieving what is expected of them as graduates. In this article we present the results of a study in which faculty focus groups were consulted so as to understand the subjective issues that surround the learning outcomes assessment program of an institution. We hope that our study contributes to continuous improvement in institutional assessment practices and to the improvement of student learning. We analysed the data through the lens provided by a leadership model since leadership is a key driver of assessment practices that lead to changes to improve student learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcario, P., Eynon, B., Klages, M., & Polnariev, B. A. (2013). Closing the loop: How we better serve our students through a comprehensive assessment process. Metropolitan Universities Journal, 24(2), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta, T. W. (2011). Demonstrating the impact of changes based on assessment findings. In T. W. Banta (Ed.), A bird’s eye view of assessment: Selections from editor’s notes (pp. 42–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta, T. W., & Palomba, C. A. (2015). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta, T. W., Jones, E. A., & Black, K. E. (2009). Designing effective assessment: Principles and profiles of good practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaich, C., & Wise, K. (2011). From gathering to using assessment results: Lessons from the Wabash national study. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/Wabash_001.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C. (2009). Interviews in organizational research. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 500–515). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, G. (2010). Issues and challenges in higher education leadership: Engaging for change. Australian Educational Researcher, 37(3), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, K. H., Good, M. R., Coleman, C. M., & Smith, K. L. (2014). A simple model for learning improvement: Weigh pig, feed pig, weigh pig. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/documents/Occasional_Paper_23.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Guetterman, T. C., & Mitchell, N. (2015). The role of leadership and culture in creating meaningful assessment: A mixed methods case study. Innovative Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9330-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. (1992). Managing strategic change- strategy, culture and action. Long Range Planning, 25(1), 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2013). Institutionalizing student outcomes assessment: The need for better research to inform practice. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Carducci, R. (2008). Revolutionizing leadership development: Lessons from research and theory. In A. Kezar (Ed.), Rethinking leadership in a complex, multicultural, and global environment: New concepts and models for higher education (pp. 1–38). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Ikenberry, S. O., Jankowski, N. A., Cain, T. R., Ewell, P., Hutchings, P., & Kinzie, J. (2014). Using evidence of student learning to improve higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, C. A., & Jones, E. (2014). Creating a culture of faculty participation in assessment: Factors that promote and impede satisfaction. Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness, 4, 85–101. doi:10.1353/aie.2014.0000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2009). Assessment in cycles of improvement: Faculty designs for essential learning outcomes. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. L. (2007). Strategic leadership: Integrating strategy and leadership in colleges and universities. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndoye, A. (2013). Promoting learning outcomes assessment in higher education: Factors of success. Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness, 3, 157–175. doi:10.1353/aie.2013.0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndoye, A., & Parker, M. A. (2010). Creating and sustaining a culture of assessment. Planning for Higher Education, 38(2), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. W., & Vaughan, D. S. (2002). Promoting academic improvement: Organizational and administrative dynamics that support student assessment. In T. W. Banta (Ed.), Building a scholarship of assessment (pp. 26–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, M., Grays, M. P., Fulcher, K. H., & Jurich, D. P. (2013). Improving academic program assessment: A mixed methods study. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, N. (1995). Unravelling conceptual developments in implementation analysis. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 54, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoepp, K., & Benson, S. (2016). Meta-Assessment: Assessing the learning outcomes assessment program. Innovative Higher Education, 41, 287–301. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9347-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snape, D., & Spencer, L. (2003). The foundations of qualitative research. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 1–23). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suskie, L. (2014). Five dimensions of quality: A common sense guide to accreditation and accountability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walvoord, B. E. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: theory, method, and practice (pp. 177–199). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burcu Tezcan-Unal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schoepp, K., Tezcan-Unal, B. Examining the Effectiveness of a Learning Outcomes Assessment Program: a Four Frames Perspective. Innov High Educ 42, 305–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9384-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9384-5

Keywords

Navigation