Abstract
Early nineteenth century systematists sought to describe what they called the Natural System or the Natural Classification. In the nineteenth century, there was no agreement about the basis of observed patterns of similarity between organisms. What did these systematists think they were doing, when they named taxa, proposed relationships between taxa, and arranged taxa into representational schemes? In this paper I explicate Charles Frederic Girard’s (1822–1895) theory and method of systematics. A student of Louis Agassiz, and subsequently (1850–1858) a collaborator with Spencer Baird, Girard claimed that natural classificatory methods do not presuppose either a special creationist or an evolutionary theory of the natural world. The natural system, in Girard’s view, comprises three distinct ways in which organisms can be related to each other. Girard analyzed these relationships, and justified his classificatory methodology, by appeal to his embryological and physiological work. Girard offers an explicit theoretical answer to the question, what characters are evidence for natural classificatory hypotheses? I show that the challenge of simultaneously depicting the three distinct types of relationship led Girard to add a third dimension to his classificatory diagrams.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agassiz, Louis. Louis Agassiz Papers: Ernst Mayr Library of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Agassiz, Louis. 1849. “On the Difference Between Progressive, Embryonic, and Prophetic Types.” Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 2: 432–438.
Agassiz, Louis. 1859. An Essay on Classification. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans & Roberts & Trübner.
Agassiz, Louis and Gould, A.A. 1859. Principles of Zoölogy : Touching the Structure, Development, Distribution, and Natural Arrangement of the Races of Animals, Living and Extinct with Numerous Illustrations: Part I, Comparative Physiology, for the Use of Schools and Colleges. Boston: Gould and Lincoln.
Baird, Spencer F. Spencer F. Baird Papers. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Archives.
Burnett, G.T. 1830. “Illustrations of the Quadrupeda, or Quadrupeds, Being the Arrangement of the True Four-Footed Beasts”. Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature, and Art 1829: 336–353.
Cuvier, G. 1817. Le Règne Animal Distribué d’Après son Organisation. Paris: Deterville.
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.
Flourens, P. and Cuvier, F. 1841. Résumé Analytique des Observations de Frédéric Cuvier sur l’Instinct et l’Intelligence des Animaux. Paris: C. Pitois.
Flourens, P. and Cuvier, F. 1845. De l’Instinct et de l’Intelligence des Animaux: Résumé des Observations de Frédéric Cuvier sur ce Sujet. Paris: Paulin.
Gardner, Alfred L. 2005. “Didelphimorphia.” Don E. Wilson and DeeAnn Reeder (eds.), Mammal Species of the World. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–18.
Gervais, P. 1855. Histoire Naturelle des Mammifères, avec l’Indication de Leurs Moeurs, et de Leurs Rapports avec les Arts, le Commerce, et l’Agriculture. Paris: L. Curmer.
Girard, Charles. Charles Frederic Girard Papers. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Archives.
Girard, Charles. 1850. “On the Embryology of Planaria.” Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science ii: 398.
Girard, Charles. 1851a. “Essay on the Classification of Nemertes and Planariæ.” Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 4: 258–273.
Girard, Charles. 1851b. “Mammalia.” S.F. Baird (ed.), Iconographic Encyclopædia of Science, Literature, and Arts. New York: Rudolph Garrigue, pp. 392–502.
Girard, Charles. 1851c. “On the Classification of Mammalia.” Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 6: 319–335.
Girard, Charles. 1854. “Embryology of Planocera elliptica.” Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences 2(2): 307–325.
Girard, Charles. 1864. Les États ConfÉdÉrÉs d’AmÉrique visitÉs en 1863. Paris: E. Dentu.
Girard, Charles. 1962. A Visit to the Confederate States of America in 1863: Memoir Addressed to His Majesty Napoleon III. Trans. William Stanley Hoole. Confederate Centennial Studies, vol. 21. Tuscaloosa, AL: Confederate Publishing Company, Inc.
Goode, G.B. 1851–1896. George Brown Goode Collection. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Archives.
Goode, G.B. 1891. The Published Writings of Dr. Charles Girard. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Gray, J.E. 1825. “Outline of an Attempt at the Disposition of the Mammalia into Tribes and Families with a List of the Genera Apparently Appertaining to Each Tribe.” Annals of Philosophy, Series 2(10): 337–344.
Hankeln, Thomas, Alexandria R. Wey-Fabrizius, Holger Herlyn, Alexander Witek, Mathias Weber, Maximilian P. Nesnidal and Torsten H. Struck. 2014. “Phylogeny of Platyzoan Taxa Based on Molecular Data.” J. Wolfgang Wägele and Thomas Bartolomaeus (eds.), Deep Metazoan Phylogeny. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
Heck, J.G. 1849. Bilder-Atlas zum Conversations-Lexicon. Ikonographische Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus.
Heck, J.G. 1852. Iconographic Encyclopaedia of Science, Literature, and Art. Trans. Spencer Fullerton Baird. New York, NY: R. Garrigue.
Illiger, C.D. 1811. Prodromus Systematis Mammalium et Avium Additis Terminis Zoographicis Uttriusque Classis. Berlin: Salfield.
Irmscher, C. 2013. Louis Agassiz: Creator of American Science. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Jackson, James R. and Kimler, William C. 1999. “Taxonomy and the Personal Equation: The Historical Fates of Charles Girard and Louis Agassiz.” Journal of the History of Biology 32(3): 509–555.
Lesson, R.P. 1842. Nouveau tableau du règne animal: Mammifères. Paris: Arthus Bertrand.
Macleay, W.S. 1821. Horae Entomologicae: Or Essays on the Annulose Animals, vol. 1–2. London: S. Bagster.
Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Novick, Aaron. 2015. “On the Origins of the Quinarian System of Classification.” Journal of the History of Biology 49(1): 95–133. doi:10.1007/s10739-015-9419-2.
O’Hara, Robert J. 1991. “Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth Century.” Biology & Philosophy 6(2): 255–274.
Pallas, P.S. and P. Boddaert. 1768. Dierkundig Mengelwerk. Trans. P. Boddaert. Utrecht: Van Paddenburg, Van Schoonhoven.
Pfeifer, Edward J. 1974. “United States.” Thomas F. Glick (ed.), The Comparative Reception of Darwinism. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, pp. 168–206.
Pietsch, T.W. 2012. Trees of Life: A Visual History of Evolution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; published with the assistance of the University of Washington.
Rafinesque, C.S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature ou Tableau de l’Univers et des Corps Organisés. Palermo: Jean Barra Vecchia.
Rehbock, P.F. 1983. The Philosophical Naturalists: Themes in Early Nineteenth-Century British Biology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Whewell, W. 1847. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Founded Upon Their History. London: John W. Parker.
Winsor, Mary P. 1976. Starfish, Jellyfish, and the Order of Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Winsor, Mary P. 1991. Reading the Shape of Nature: Comparative Zoology at the Agassiz Museum. Chiacgo, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Winsor, Mary P. 2015a. “Considering Affinity: An Ethereal Conversation (Part One of Three).” Endeavour 39(1): 69–79.
Winsor, Mary P. 2015b. “Considering Affinity: An Ethereal Conversation (Part Two of Three).” Endeavour 39(2): 116–126.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quinn, A. Charles Girard: Relationships and Representation in Nineteenth Century Systematics. J Hist Biol 50, 609–643 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9447-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9447-6