Abstract
This qualitative study scrutinised the experiences of intercultural relationship development between international and domestic students at two Japanese private universities, which have contrastive degrees of commitment to internationalisation in regard to stated vision, curriculum, international student enrolment and languages of instruction. Kudo et al.’s (Higher Education, 77(3), 473–489, 2019) three-stage ecological and person-in-context conceptual framework was adopted to gain insight into the roles of institutional internationalisation and personal agency in intercultural relationship development. A thematic analysis of interview data from 32 students (14 domestics, 18 internationals) revealed that institutional internationalisation may play a relatively small role in promoting intercultural relationship development compared to students’ agency. A detailed examination of the associations between three forms of agency (i.e. situated, cosmopolitan and creative) and three relational stages (i.e. interactivity, reciprocity and unity) led to the identification of cosmopolitan agency as a meaningful hallmark of intercultural relationship development. These findings call for future research aimed at identifying the environmental and individual conditions that are most conducive to the cultivation of cosmopolitan agency in both international and domestic students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arkoudis, S., Watty, K., Baik, C., Yu, X., Borland, H., Chang, S., et al. (2013). Finding common ground: enhancing interaction between domestic and international students in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719156.
Ayres, L. (2008). Thematic coding and analysis. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 867–868). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Bennett, R. J., Volet, S. E., & Fozdar, F. E. (2013). “I’d say it’s kind of unique in a way”: the development of an intercultural student relationship. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(5), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315312474937.
Boni, A., & Calabuig, C. (2017). Education for global citizenship at universities: potentialities of formal and informal learning spaces to foster cosmopolitanism. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315602926.
Colvin, C., & Volet, S. (2014). Scrutinising local students’ accounts of positive intercultural interactions: a multidimensional analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 42, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.06.004.
Dunne, C. (2013). Exploring motivations for intercultural contact among host country university students: an Irish case study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(5), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.06.003.
Gareis, E. (2017). Intercultural friendship and communication. In L. Chen (Ed.), Intercultural communication (pp. 457–480). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Gareis, E., Goldman, J., & Merkin, R. (2018). Promoting intercultural friendship among college students. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2018.1502339.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
God, Y. T., & Zhang, H. (2019). Intercultural challenges, intracultural practices: how Chinese and Australian students understand and experience intercultural communication at an Australian university. Higher Education, 78(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0344-0.
Jindal-Snape, D., & Rienties, B. (Eds.). (2016). Multi-dimensional transitions of internatoinal students to higher education. Milton Park: Routledge.
Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260832.
Kudo, K., Volet, S., & Whitsed, C. (2019). Development of intercultural relationships at university: a three-stage ecological and person-in-context conceptual framework. Higher Education, 77(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0283-9.
Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. Oxon: Routledge.
Marginson, S. (2014). Student self-formation in international education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(1), 6–22.
Marginson, S., & Sawir, E. (2011). Ideas for intercultural education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
McKenzie, L., & Baldassar, L. (2017). Missing friendships: understanding the absent relationships of local and international students at an Australian university. Higher Education, 74(4), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0073-1.
Nada, C. I., Montgomery, C., & Araújo, H. C. (2018). ‘You went to Europe and returned different’: transformative learning experiences of international students in Portugal. European Educational Research Journal, 17(5), 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118765334.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Richardson, S. (2016). Cosmopolitan learning for a global era: higher education in an interconnected world. London: Routledge.
Snow, R. (1994). Abilities in academic tasks. In R. Sternberg & R. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 3–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Dauber, D. (2019). Internationalisation and student diversity: How far are the opportunity benefits being perceived and exploited? Higher Education, 78, 1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00386-4.
Tran, L. T., & Pham, L. (2016). International students in transnational mobility: intercultural connectedness with domestic and international peers, institutions and the wider community. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(4), 560–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2015.1057479.
Tran, L. T., & Vu, T. T. P. (2017). ‘Agency in mobility’: towards a conceptualisation of international student agency in transnational mobility. Educational Review, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1293615.
Ujitani, E., & Volet, S. (2008). Socio-emotional challenges in international education: Insight into reciprocal understanding and intercultural relational development. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240908099975.
Volet, S., & Ang, G. (1998). Culturally mixed groups on international campuses: an opportunity for inter-cultural learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 17(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436980170101.
Yu, Y., & Moskal, M. (2019). Why do christian churches, and not universities, facilitate intercultural engagement for Chinese international students? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 68, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.10.006.
Zou, T. X. P., & Yu, J. (2019). Intercultural interactions in Chinese classrooms: a multiple-case study. Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1647415.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kudo, K., Volet, S. & Whitsed, C. Intercultural relationship development and higher education internationalisation: a qualitative investigation based on a three-stage ecological and person-in-context conceptual framework. High Educ 80, 913–932 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00523-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00523-4