Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How lecturers’ understanding of change is embedded in disciplinary practices: a multiple case study

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the literature, higher education teaching is typically conceptualised as generic or determined by disciplinary characteristics. Academic development literature mirrors this dichotomy when discussing the starting point for development work. However, this focus on universal characteristics overlooks crucial aspects of contextual influence on teaching and of lecturers’ derived willingness to change their teaching. This article contributes to the existing literature by illustrating how understanding of and willingness to change is a part of a disciplinary practice. The analysis demonstrates how disciplinary dispositions create frames of meaning in which the understanding of change is embedded. Further, it is argued that academic development has a greater chance of succeeding if it aims at the working-group level, challenges the discipline values and takes an outsider perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Brew, A. (2013). Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.671771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2016). The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908.

  • Chick, N. L., Haynie, A., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2012). Exploring more signature pedagogies: approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debowski, S. (2014). From agents of change to partners in arms: the emerging academic developer role. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.862621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, J. (2002). Learning to think: disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, L., & Mansvelt, J. (2014). ‘If they’re the customer, I’m the meat in the sandwich’: an exploration of tertiary teachers’ metaphorical constructions of teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, L., & Mansvelt, J. (2015). Buckets and fire: metaphors in tertiary teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.886682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2008). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404040463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P., Kitay, J., & Prosser, M. (2010). Transfer of academic staff learning in a research-intensive university. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003740783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurung, R. A. R., Chick, N. L., & Haynie, A. (Eds.). (2009). Exploring signature pedagogies: approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (first ed.). USA: Stylish Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handal, G. (1999). Consultation using critical friends. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999(79), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.7907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2003). Disicpline-based educational development. In H. Eggins & R. Macdonald (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development (pp. 47–57). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A. S. P. (2000). A conceptual change approach to staff development: a model for programme design. International Journal for Academic Development, 5(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/136014400410088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A., Watkins, D., & Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning. An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education, 42, 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. A. (2011). Variation among academic disciplines: an update on analytical frameworks and research. The Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T., & Trowler, P. R. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2010). Academics’ teacher identities, authenticity and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902953048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(21), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: a study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching-scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120052071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: a conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottewill, R., Macfarlane, B. (2003). Pedagogic challenges facing business and management educators: Assessing the evidence. The International Journal for Management Education, 3(3), 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teacher and Teacher Education, 23, 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quaterly, 42(4), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2013). How effects from teacher-training of academic teachers propogate into the meso level and beyond. In E. Simon & G. Pleschova (Eds.), Teacher development in higher education. Existing programs, program impact, and future trends (pp. 213–233). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K. (1999). Academics educational beliefs and teaching practices. (Unpublished Ph.D.). Griffith University, School of Curriculum.

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroyan, A. (2014). Agency matters: academic developers’ quests and achievements. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.862622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1993). Teaching as a community property. Putting an end to pedagogical solitude. Change, 25(6), 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134, 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeby, J. (1996). Disciplinary differences in university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 21(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079612331381467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intentions and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education. Theories and practice. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2012). Disciplines and interdisciplinarity: conceptual groundwork. In P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Academic tribes and territories in the 21st century. Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education (1st ed., pp. 5–29). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2014). Depicting and researching disciplines: strong and moderate essentialist approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1720–1731. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulriksen, L. (2009). The implied student. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, E., & Nückles, M. (2015). Knowledge acquisition or participation in communities of practice? Academics’ metaphors of teaching and learning at the university. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 624–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. (2010). Generic or discipline-specific? An exploration of the significance of discipline-specific issues in researching and developing teaching and learning in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to show my gratitude to my colleague Karen M. Lauridsen for sharing her pearls of wisdom with me during the editing of this article, and I thank the reviewers for their thorough work, their most valued insights and their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Teaching and Learning, Aarhus School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 10, Build. 1323, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Anna Bager-Elsborg

Authors
  1. Anna Bager-Elsborg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Bager-Elsborg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bager-Elsborg, A. How lecturers’ understanding of change is embedded in disciplinary practices: a multiple case study. High Educ 76, 195–212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0195-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0195-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation