Abstract
While it is not explicitly included in capacity assessment tools, “consistency” has come to feature as a central concern when assessing patients’ capacity. In order to determine whether inconsistency indicates incapacity, clinicians must determine the source of the inconsistency with respect to the process or content of a patient’s decision-making. In this paper, we outline common types of inconsistency and analyze them against widely accepted elements of capacity. We explore the question of whether inconsistency necessarily entails a deficiency in a patient’s capacity. While inconsistency may count as prima facie evidence of incapacity—enough evidence to justify a closer look—when making such determinations, it is important for clinicians to slow down, inquire about the reasons underlying the inconsistency and clearly show which of the elements of capacity the patient fails to satisfy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Clinical practice: Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(18), 1834–1840. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp074045
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988). Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 319(25), 1635–1638. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198812223192504
Banner, N. F. (2012). Unreasonable reasons. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(5), 1038–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01914.x
Carney, M., Neugroschl, J., & Morrison, R., et al. (2001). The development and piloting of a capacity assessment tool. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 12(1), 17–23.
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). MacArthur competence assessment tool for treatment (MacCAT-T). Washington D.C: Professional Resource Press.
Lui, V. W. C., Lam, L. C. W., Chau, R. C. M., & Fung, A. W. T., et al. (2013). Structured assessment of mental capacity to make financial decisions in Chinese older persons with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 26(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988713481268
Moore, B., Nelson, R. H., Ubel, P. A., & Blumenthal-Barby, J. (2021). Two minds, one patient: Clearing up confusion about “ambivalence.” The American Journal of Bioethics. Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1887965
Pruchno, R. A., Rovine, M. J., Cartwright, F., & Wilson-Genderson, M. (2008). Stability and change in patient preferences and spouse substituted judgments regarding dialysis continuation. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(2), S81–S91. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.2.s81
Rorty, A. (2014). The ethics of collaborative ambivalence. The Journal of Ethics, 18(4), 391–403.
Siegel, A. M., Barnwell, A. S., & Sisti, D. A. (2014). Assessing decision-making capacity: A primer for the development of hospital practice guidelines. HEC Forum, 26(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-014-9234-8
Sorrentino, R. (2014). Performing capacity evaluations: What’s expected from your consult. Current Psychiatry, 13(1), 41–44.
Zaubler, T. S., Viederman, M., & Fins, J. J. (1996). Ethical, legal, and psychiatric issues in capacity, competency, and informed consent: An annotated bibliography. General Hospital Psychiatry, 18(3), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(96)00016-3
Funding
This research was not supported by any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BM, RHN, NM and NP conceptualized the manuscript. BM, NP and RHN drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors accept responsibility for the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable. The case presented in the manuscript is a fictional composite.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, B., Nelson, R.H., Meredyth, N. et al. Consistently Inconsistent: Does Inconsistency Really Indicate Incapacity?. HEC Forum 35, 215–222 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09462-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09462-8