Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When Religion and Medicine Clash: Non-beneficial Treatments and Hope for a Miracle

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient and family demands for the initiation or continuation of life-sustaining medically non-beneficial treatments continues to be a major issue. This is especially relevant in intensive care units, but is also a challenge in other settings, most notably with cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Differences of opinion between physicians and patients/families about what are appropriate interventions in specific clinical situations are often fraught with highly strained emotions, and perhaps none more so when the family bases their desires on religious belief. In this essay, I discuss non-beneficial treatments in light of these sorts of disputes, when there is a clash between the nominally secular world of fact- and evidence-based medicine and the faith-based world of hope for a miraculous cure. I ask the question whether religious belief can justify providing treatment that has either no or a vanishly small chance of restoring meaningful function. I conclude that non-beneficial therapy by its very definition cannot be helpful, and indeed is often harmful, to patients and hence cannot be justified no matter what the source or kind of reasons used to support its use. Therefore, doctors may legitimately refuse to provide such treatments, so long as they do so for acceptable clinical reasons. They must also offer alternatives, including second (and third) opinions, as well the option of transferring the care of the patient to a more accommodating physician or institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The statutory language states “Death not declared in violation of individual's religious beliefs The death of an individual shall not be declared upon the basis of neurological criteria pursuant to sections 3 and 4 of this act when the licensed physician authorized to declare death, has reason to believe, on the basis of information in the individual's available medical records, or information provided by a member of the individual's family or any other person knowledgeable about the individual's personal religious beliefs that such a declaration would violate the personal religious beliefs of the individual. In these cases, death shall be declared, and the time of death fixed, solely upon the basis of cardio-respiratory criteria pursuant to section 2 of this act” (The New Jersey Declaration of Death Act, §26:6A-5 available at http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/).

  2. http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/.

  3. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/119052?rskey=p0m86h&result=1#eid.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip M. Rosoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosoff, P.M. When Religion and Medicine Clash: Non-beneficial Treatments and Hope for a Miracle. HEC Forum 31, 119–139 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-018-9352-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-018-9352-9

Keywords

Navigation