Skip to main content
Log in

Unconfined Compression Strength of Polymer Stabilized Forest Soil Clay

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to undesired mechanical characteristics, some forest soils cause problems in road construction. Several methods have been proposed for stabilizing these types of soils. In this paper, the impact of two polymer materials on unconfined compression strength of a forest soil is investigated. The unconfined compression strength (UCS) tests were carried out on the soil samples treated with two different polymer materials as well as the control sample. The results of UCS tests show an increase in the maximum dry unit weight by adding polymeric materials of RPP (Road Packer Plus) and CBR Plus (California Bearing Ratio Plus) to the soil. The results also show that polymeric materials improve the UCS of the soil that is dependent on the percentage of polymeric materials and curing time. According to the obtained results, treated samples indicate an increase in the strength with different percentages of RPP and CBR Plus as 32.143–91.30% and 55.84–168.56% for 0.019–0.1% and 0.0096–0.09% content of materials, respectively. The results show that the highest level of the stress and strain for RPP were 151.42 (kPa) and 4.6% (with addition of 0.1% RPP) and 167.13 kPa and 3.1% (with addition 0.09% CBR Plus), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  • Abadjieva T (2001) Chemical stabilisation for low cost roads in Botswana. In: First road transportation technology transfer conference in AfricaTanzania Ministry of Works

  • Ali F (2012) Stabilization of residual soils using liquid chemical. Electron J Geotech Eng 17:115–126

    Google Scholar 

  • American society for testing and materials (ASTM) (1995) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils (D4318-05). ASTM, pp 1–16

  • Behnood A (2018) Soil and clay stabilization with calcium-and non-calcium-based additives: a state-of-the-art review of challenges, approaches and techniques. Transp Geotech 17:14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell FG (1996) Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Eng Geol 42:223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(96)00028-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bera AK, Mukhopadhyay T, Mohan PJ, Dey TK (2018) A multi-attribute decision making approach of mix design based on experimental soil characterization. Front Struct Civ Eng 12:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Standard (2016) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. Part 1: General requirements and sample preparation [WWW Document]. BS 1377-1990, London. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/10052867/BS1377-1. Accessed 4 Nov 19

  • Das BM (2013) Advanced soil mechanics, 4th edn. Crc Press, London. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15955

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeBlasis NJ (2008) The influence of curing temperature on cement stabilization of North Carolina soils

  • Ding B, Kim H, Lee S, Shao C, Lee D, Park S, Choi K (2002) Preparation and characterization of a nanoscale poly(vinyl alcohol) fiber aggregate produced by an electrospinning method. J Polym Sci B 40:1261–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu WJ, Shang QS, Liu ST, Zhao ZZ, Fan ZJ, Gao XC, Chang Y, Zhong Y, Ou QC, Hu W, Shang Q, Liu S, Zhao Z, Fan Z, Gao X, Chang Y, Zhong Y, Ou Q (2007) The application technology of RoadPacker solidified limestone soil. In: International conference on transportation engineering 2007, pp 692–697

  • Hu H-W, Zhang L-M, Dai Y, Di H-J, He J-Z (2013) pH-dependent distribution of soil ammonia oxidizers across a large geographical scale as revealed by high-throughput pyrosequencing. J Soils Sediments 13:1439–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavak A, Bilgen G, Mutman U (2010) In-situ modification of a road material using a special polymer. Sci Res Essays 5:2547–2555

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HJ, Zhang B, Zhao J, Zhang XY, Song KS, Wang ZM, Duan H (2007) Spectral models for prediction of organic matter in black soil. Acta Pedol Sin 44:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Shi B, Gu K, Jiang H, Inyang HI (2012) Effect of polyurethane on the stability of sand–clay mixtures. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:537–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA, Azad S (2000) Influence of soil type on stabilization with cement kiln dust. Constr Build Mater 14:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00007-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzababaei M, Yasrobi S, Al-Rawas A (2009) Effect of polymers on swelling potential of expansive soils. Proc ICE Gr Improv 162:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzababaei M, Arulrajah A, Ouston M (2017) Polymers for stabilization of soft clay soils. Procedia Eng 189:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moayed ZR, Allahyari F (2012) Determination of required ion exchange solution for stabilizing clayey soils with various PI. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 61(61):1098–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloisane RJ, Visser AT (2014) Evaluation of the strength behaviour of unpaved road material treated with electrochemical-based non-traditional soil stabilisation additives. J S Afr Inst Civ Eng 56:28–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi F, Abdi E, Rahimi H (2014) Effect of polymer stabilizer on swelling potential and CBR of forest road material. KSCE J Civ Eng 18:2064–2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0137-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SE, Karamvand A (2017) Assessment of strength development in stabilized soil with CBR PLUS and silica sand. J Traffic Transp Eng 4:412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2017.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeini SA, Naderinia B, Izadi E (2012) Unconfined compressive strength of clayey soils stabilized with waterborne polymer. KSCE J Civ Eng 16:943–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham MJ, Brinker SR (2009) Rare vascular plants of Ontario. Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

  • Onyejekwe S, Ghataora GS (2015) Soil stabilization using proprietary liquid chemical stabilizers: Sulphonated oil and a polymer. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74:651–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer JT, Edgar TV, Boresi AP (1995) Strength and density modification of unpaved road soils due to chemical additives

  • Park J, Vipulanandan C, Kim JW, Oh MH (2006) Effects of surfactants and electrolyte solutions on the properties of soil. Environ Geol 49:977–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primuz P, Peterfalvi J, Kosztka M, Marko G (2008) Bearing capacity of lime-stabilized soils. For Constr Ctry Recreat use

  • Rauch AF, Harmon JS, Katz LE, Liljestrand HM (2002) Liquid soil stabilizers: measured effects on engineering properties of clay. In: Transportation research record. Transportation Research Board Washington, DC, pp 33–41

  • Santoni RL, Tingle JS, Nieves M (2005) Accelerated strength improvement of silty sand with nontraditional additives. Transp Res Rec 1936:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoni V, Verdoucq L, Sommerer N, Vinh J, Pflieger D, Maurel C (2006) Methylation of aquaporins in plant plasma membrane. Biochem J 400:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholen DE (1995) Stabilizer mechanisms in nonstandard stabilizers. In: Sixth int conf low vol roads, pp 252–260

  • Shirsavkar SS, Koranne S (2010) Innovation in road construction using natural polymer. Electron J Geotech Eng 15:1614–1624

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Li L, Liao J, Huang C (2022) Dry shrinkage performance of cement-stabilized reclaimed lime-fly ash macadam. Const Build Mat 331:127332

  • Tolleson R, Shatnswi M, Harman E, Mahdavian E (2003) An evaluation of strength change on subgrade soils stabilized with an enzyme catalyst solution using CBR and SSG comparisons. Final Rep. to Univ. Transp. Cent. Grant R-02-UTC-ULTERPAVB–GEO-01.

  • Vyas S, Phougat N, Sharma P, Ratnam M (2011) Stabilization of dispersive soil by blending polymers. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4:42–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong LL, Perera SVADNJ, Syamsir A, Emmanuel E, Paul SC, Anggraini V (2019) Stabilization of a residual soil using calcium and magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles: a quick precipitation method. Appl Sci 9:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Cao Q, Pan Y (2010) Experiment research of lime-fly ash Soil’s dynamics characteristics. Rock Soil Mech 31:2560–2564

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Babak Shahbodagh and Prof. Kevin Boston for reading and editing the early version of the manuscript and their supportive comments. Also the authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of "Iran National Science Foundation (INSF)" under the project numer 4000285.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Mousavi.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mousavi, F., Abdi, E. Unconfined Compression Strength of Polymer Stabilized Forest Soil Clay. Geotech Geol Eng 40, 4095–4107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02142-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02142-5

Keywords

Navigation