Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of predictions by mode II or mode III criteria on crack front twisting in three or four point bending experiments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whatever the external loading, a crack front in a solid tries to reach mode I loading conditions after propagation. In mode I + II, the crack kinks to annihilate mode II, kinking angle being well predicted by the principle of local symmetry (PLS) or by the maximum tangential stress criterion (MTS). In presence of mode III, the problem becomes three-dimensional and the proposed propagation criterion are not yet well proved and established. In particular in three point bending experiments (3PB) with an initially inclined crack, the crack twists around the direction of propagation to finally reach a situation of pure mode I. The aim of the paper is to compare the propagation paths predicted by two different criteria for 3PB fatigue experiments performed on PMMA. The first criterion developed by Schollmann et al. (Int J Fract 117(2):129–141, 2002), is a three-dimensional extension of the MTS criterion and predicts the local angles that annihilates mode II and III at each point of the front. The second one developed by Lazarus et al. (J Mech Phys Solids 49(7):1421–1443, 2001b), predicts an abrupt and then progressive twisting of the front to annihilate mode III. Due to presence of sign changing mode II and almost uniform mode III in the experiments, both criteria give good results. However, since mode III is predominant over mode II in the case under consideration, the global criterion gives better results. Nevertheless, the local type criterion seems to be of greater universality for practical engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amestoy M, Leblond JB (1992) Crack paths in plane situations—II. Detailed form of the expansion of the stress intensity factors. Int J Solids Struct 29: 465–501

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin A, Pollard DD (1988) Progress in understanding jointing over the past century. Geol Soc Am Bull 100: 1181–1204

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bazant Z, Estenssoro L (1979) Surface singularity and crack propagation. Int J Solids Struct 15(5): 405–426

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz FG (1984) Improved formulae for the finite element calculation of the strain energy release rate by the modified crack closure integral method. In: Robinson J(eds) Accuracy, reliability and training in FEM technology. Robinson and Associates, Dorset, pp 650–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz FG, Wang H, Lin J, Richard HA (1998) 3d fracture analyses and experimental results on three-point bend specimens with slant cracks. In: Atluri SN, O’Donoghue PE (eds) Modeling and simulation based engineering. Proceedings of the international conference of engineering science (ICES 98), vol II, Tech Science Press: Palmdale, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp 1238–1243

  • Buchholz FG, Chergui A, Richard HA (2004) Fracture analyses and experimental results of crack growth under general mixed mode loading conditions. Eng Fract Mech 71(4–6): 455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz FG, Wiebesiek J, Fulland M, Richard H (2005) Comparison of computational 3d crack path simulations with experimental findings for 3pb-specimens with inclined crack planes. In: Aliabadi MH, Buchholz FG, Alfaite J (eds) Advances in fracture and damage mechanics IV. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on fracture and damage mechanics (FDM05), EC Ltd: UK, Mallorca, Spain, pp 143–148

  • Cooke ML, Pollard DD (1996) Fracture propagation paths under mixed mode loading within rectangular blocks of polymethyl methacrylate. J Geophys Res 101(B2): 3387–3400

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan G, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. ASME J Basic Eng 85: 519–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulland M, Schöllmann M, Richard HA (2000) Adapcrack3d-development of the program for the simulation of three-dimensional crack propagation processes. In: Atluri SN, Brust FW(eds) Advances in computational engineering & sciences. Tech Science Press, Palmdale, USA, pp 948–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein RV, Salganik RL (1974) Brittle fracture of solids with arbitrary cracks. Int J Fract 10: 507–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravouil A, Moes N, Belytschko T (2002) Non-planar 3d crack growth by the extended finite element and level sets. II. Level set update. Int J Numer Methods Eng 53(11): 2569–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourlier F, Pineau A (1979) Fissuration par fatigue sous sollicitations polymodales (mode I ondulé + mode III permanent) d’un acier pour rotors 26 NCDV 14. Mémoires Scientifiques de la Revue de Métallurgie pp 175–185

  • Hull D (1993) Tilting cracks: the evolution of fracture surface topology in brittle solids. Int J Fract 62(2): 119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus V, Leblond JB (1998) Crack paths under mixed mode (I + III) or (I + II + III) loadings. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Série II (Mécanique, Physique, Astronomie) 326(3): 171–177

    Article  MATH  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus V, Leblond JB, Mouchrif SE (2001a) Crack front rotation and segmentation in mixed mode I + III or I + II + III—part I: calculation of stress intensity factor. J Mech Phys Solids 49(7): 1399–1420

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus V, Leblond JB, Mouchrif SE (2001b) Crack front rotation and segmentation in mixed mode I + III or I + II + III—part II: comparison with experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 49(7): 1421–1443

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Leblond JB (1989) Crack paths in plane situations—I. General form of the expansion of the stress intensity factors. Int J Solids Struct 25: 1311–1325

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Makabe C, Anggit M, Sueyoshi T, Yafuso T (2006) The formation mechanism of the factory-roof pattern in a torsional fatigue specimen with circumferential notch. J Test Eval 34(5): 423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palaniswamy K, Knauss WG (1975) Crack extension in brittle solids. Mechanics Today, Pergamon Press 4:87

  • Pollard DD, Segall P, Delaney PT (1982) Formation and interpretation of dilatant echelon cracks. Geol Soc Am Bull 93: 1291–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pook L (1995) On fatigue crack paths. Int J Fatigue 17(1): 5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian J, Fatemi A (1996) Mixed mode fatigue crack growth: a literature survey. Eng Fract Mech 55(6): 969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybicki EF, Kanninen MF (1977) A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Eng Fract Mech 9: 931–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schollmann M, Richard H, Kullmer G, Fulland M (2002) A new criterion for the prediction of crack development in multiaxially loaded structures. Int J Fract 117(2): 129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schollmann M, Fulland M, Richard HA (2003) Development of a new software for adaptive crack growth simulations in 3d structures. Eng Fract Mech 70(2): 249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer E (1969) Formation of fracture ‘lances’ in glass. Eng Fract Mech 1: 539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates JR, Mohammed RA (1996) Crack propagation under mixed mode (I + III) loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19(10): 1285–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Lazarus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lazarus, V., Buchholz, FG., Fulland, M. et al. Comparison of predictions by mode II or mode III criteria on crack front twisting in three or four point bending experiments. Int J Fract 153, 141–151 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-008-9307-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-008-9307-2

Keywords

Navigation