Skip to main content
Log in

Quantum Physics and Reality

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrary to classical physics, which was strongly objective i.e. could be interpreted as a description of mind-independent reality, standard quantum mechanics (SQM) is only weakly objective, that is to say, its statements, though intersubjectively valid, still merely refer to operations of the mind. Essentially, in fact, they are predictive of observations. On the view that SQM is universal conventional realism is thereby refuted. It is shown however that this does not rule out a broader form of realism, called here ‘open realism’, restoring the notion of mind-independent reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petitot, J.: In: Bitbol, M., Laugier, S. (eds.) Physique et Réalité. Editions Frontière, Paris (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, M.: In: Bitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., Petitot, J. (eds.) Constituting Objectivity. The Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 74. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heisenberg, W.: Physics and Philosophy. Harper & Brothers, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  4. d’Espagnat, B.: Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. W.A. Benjamin, Reading (1991). 2d ed reset (1976), 4th ed. Perseus Books, Reading, MA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bitbol, M.: Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 3(1), 115–123 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. d’Espagnat, B.: Veiled Reality. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995). 2d ed. Westview Press, Perseus Books (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. d’Espagnat, B.: On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zurek, W.H.: Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862–1880 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elby, A.: In: Busch, P., Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P. (eds.) Symp. on Foundations of Modern Physics (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Healey, R.: In: Hellman, G., Healey, R. (eds.) Quantum Measurement, Decoherence and Lodal Interpretations. Minessota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bub, J.: Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Zurek, W.H.: Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 356, 1793–1821 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Healey, R.: J. Philos. 88, 393–421 (1881)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Esfeld, M.: Holism in Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Physics. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rovelli, C.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 1637–1657 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schrödinger, E.: Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell, J.: Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Freedman, S.J., Clauser, J.F.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., Roger, G.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weihs, G., et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamehi-Rachti, M., Mittig, W.: Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543 (1976)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rowe, M.A., et al.: Nature 409, 791 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsukevich, D.N., et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 030405 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chou, C.-W., et al.: Science 316, 1316 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Agazzi, E.: In: Agazzi, E. (ed.) Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. Rodopi, Amsterdam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bell, J.S.: In: Sarlemijn, A., Kroes, P. (eds.) Between Science and Technology, pp. 97–115. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Poincaré, H.: La science et l’hypothèse. Flammarion, Paris (1902)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Boniolo, G.: In: Agazzi, E., Pauri, M. (eds.) The Reality of the Unobservable. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Worrall, J.: Dialectica 43, 99–124 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ladyman, J.: In: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 29, pp. 409–424 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bitbol, M.: De l’intérieur du monde. Flammarion, Paris (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zwirn, H.: Les limites de la connaissance. Odile Jacob, Paris (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. d’Espagnat, B.: In Search of Reality. Springer, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Agazzi, E.: In: Agazzi, E., Pauri, M. (eds.) The Reality of the Unobservable. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bitbol, M.: In: Soler, L. (ed.) Philosophie de la physique. L’Harmattan, Paris (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard d’Espagnat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

d’Espagnat, B. Quantum Physics and Reality. Found Phys 41, 1703–1716 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9582-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9582-z

Keywords

Navigation