Skip to main content
Log in

Joule’s Nineteenth Century Energy Conservation Meta-law and the Twentieth Century Physics (Quantum Mechanics and Relativity): Twenty-First Century Analysis

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Joule’s Energy Conservation Law was the first “meta-law”: a general principle that all physical equations must satisfy. It has led to many important and useful physical discoveries. However, a recent analysis seems to indicate that this meta-law is inconsistent with other principles—such as the existence of free will. We show that this conclusion about inconsistency is based on a seemingly reasonable—but simplified—analysis of the situation. We also show that a more detailed mathematical and physical analysis of the situation reveals that not only Joule’s principle remains true—it is actually strengthened: it is no longer a principle that all physical theories should satisfy—it is a principle that all physical theories do satisfy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Compatibilism. (2020). Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved February 8 from https://plato.stanford.edu.

  • Crick, F. (1993). The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York: Charles Scribner & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (1983). God and the new physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1984). Elbow room. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (2003). Freedom evolves. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. (1986). A primer on determinism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R., Leighton, R., & Sands, M. (2005). The Feynman lectures on physics. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. M. (1989). God, foreknowledge and freedom. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy, 66, 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. N. (1957). Einstein’s and other theories of gravitation. Review of Modern Physics, 29, 334–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, J. (1958). What means this freedom? In S. Hook (Ed.), Determinism and freedom in the age of modern science (pp. 126–142). New York: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joule, J. P. (1843). On the calorific effects of magneto-electricity, and on the mechanical value of heat. Philosophical Magazine, 3(23), 263–276, 347–355, 435–443.

  • Joule, J. P. (1845). On the changes of temperature produced by the rarefaction and condensation of air. Philosophical Magazine, 3(26, 174), 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joule, J. P. (1887). Joint scientific papers of James Prescott Joule. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, R. (2002). The Oxford handbook of free will. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreinovich, V. (1975). Gupta’s derivation of Einstein equations. Soviet Academy of Sciences Doklady, 222(2), 319–321. ((1975, in Russian); translated into English as Soviet Physics Doklady, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 341–342).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreinovich, V. (2013). In quantum physics, free will leads to non-conservation of energy. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 7(3), 176–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreinovich, V., & Kosheleva, O. (2013). Is Lagrangian formalism adequately describing energy conservation? Mathematical Structures and Modelling, 28(2), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreinovich, V., & Ortiz, A. (2012). If energy is not preserved, then Planck’s constant is no longer a constant: A theorem. Mathematical Structures and Modeling, 26, 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, L. D., & Lifschitz, E. M. (1980). The classical theory of fields. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R., Shimony, A., Cartwright, N., Hawking, S., & Longair, M. (2000). The large, the small and the human mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, T. E, Jr. (1973). Time asymmetry and quantum equations of motion. Foundations of Physics, 3, 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilansky, S. (2000). Free will and illusion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1975). Simplicity. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1993). The transcendental character of determinism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18, 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., & Hrabovsky, G. (2014). The theoretical minimum: What you need to know to start doing physics. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipler, F. J. (1994). The physics of immortality: Modern cosmology, God and the resurrection of the dead. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, K. S., & Blandford, R. D. (2017). Modern classical physics: Optics, fluids, plasmas, elasticity, relativity, and statistical physics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trusted, J. (1984). Free will and responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urenda, J. C. & Kosheleva, O. (2008). How to reconcile physical theories with the idea of free will: from analysis of a simple model to interval and fuzzy approaches. In Proceedings of the IEEE world congress on computational intelligence WCCI’2008 (pp. 1024–1029), Hong Kong, China, June 1–6, 2008.

  • Van Inwagen, P. (1983). An essay on free will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to dedicate to Yakov Kreinovich, late Vladik’s father and Olga’s father-in-law, whose ideas were one of the main triggers for this research. We are thankful to the referees for their very useful suggestions and very interesting references and ideas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladik Kreinovich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation Grants 1623190 (A Model of Change for Preparing a New Generation for Professional Practice in Computer Science) and HRD-1242122 (Cyber-ShARE Center of Excellence).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kreinovich, V., Kosheleva, O. Joule’s Nineteenth Century Energy Conservation Meta-law and the Twentieth Century Physics (Quantum Mechanics and Relativity): Twenty-First Century Analysis. Found Sci 26, 703–725 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09659-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09659-z

Keywords

Navigation