Abstract
Size effect studies generally suggest that a return premium exists for small firms. While the size effect has mostly disappeared in recent years in mature markets (e.g., US and UK), it remains mostly strong in developing markets. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between firm size and excess stock returns in the Chinese stock markets, and to examine this effect in both a bull and bear market. No studies have previously examined these relationships in the Chinese markets. The results of the study indicate that a size effect exists in the Chinese stock markets over the 6-year period from 1998 to 2003. We find small firms have significantly greater excess returns than large firms. Moreover, small firms are found to have a stronger reaction to the direction of the market than large firms. Small firms have significantly greater positive excess returns than large firms during the bull market. However, small firms have significantly greater negative returns (using total market value), or no significant difference in returns (using float market value) during the bear market period.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Rjoub S.A.M., Varela O., Hassan M.K. (2005) The size effect reversal in the USA. Applied Financial Economics 15: 1189–1197. doi:10.1080/09603100500359542
Badrinath S.G., Kini O. (1994) The relationship between securities yields, firm size, earnings/price ratios and Tobin’s q. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 21(1): 109–131. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1994.tb00308.x
Banz R. (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics 9(1): 3–18. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(81)90018-0
Berk J. (1995) A critique of size-related anomalies. Review of Financial Studies 8: 275–286. doi:10.1093/rfs/8.2.275
Bhardway R.K., Brooks L.D. (1992) The January anomaly: Effects of low share price, transaction costs, and bid-ask bias. The Journal of Finance 47: 553–575. doi:10.2307/2329115
Bhardway R.K., Brooks D.L. (1993) Dual betas from bull and bear markets: Reversal of the size effect. Journal of Financial Research 16(4): 269–283
Chan K.C., Chen N. (1991) Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms. The Journal of Finance 46(4): 1467–1484
Chang E., McQueen G., Pinegar J. (1999) Cross-autocorrelation in Asian stock markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 7: 471–493. doi:10.1016/S0927-538X(99)00021-9
Choi D.F.S., Zhao X. (2007) Cross-autocorrelation in the New Zealand stock market. Applied Financial Economics 17: 215–219. doi:10.1080/09603100600675508
Christie A.A. (1982) The stochastic behavior of common stock variances: Value, leverage and interest rate effects. Journal of Financial Economics 10: 407–432. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(82)90018-6
Dimson E., Marsh P. (1999) Murphy’s law and market anomalies. Journal of Portfolio Management 25(2): 53–69
Elfakhani S., Wei J. (2003) The survivorship bias, share price effect, and small firm effect in Canadian markets. Review of Financial Economics 12: 397–411. doi:10.1016/j.rfe.2003.09.002
Fama E.F., French K.R. (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance 47(2): 427–465
Fama E.F., French K.R. (1995) Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. The Journal of Finance 50: 131–155. doi:10.2307/2329241
Fama E.F., French K.R. (2006) The value premium and the CAPM. The Journal of Finance 61(5): 2163–2184. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01054.x
Friend I., Lang L.H.P. (1988) The size effect on stock returns. Journal of Banking & Finance 12(1): 13–30. doi:10.1016/0378-4266(88)90047-7
Garza-Gomez X., Hodoshima J., Kunimura M. (1998) Does size really matter in Japan?. Financial Analysts Journal 54(6): 22–34. doi:10.2469/faj.v54.n6.2222
George T.J., Hwang C. (1995) Transitory price changes and price-limit rules: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial and Quantitiative Analysis 30(2): 313–327
Guo H. (2004) Stock prices, firm size, and changes in the federal funds rate target. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 44: 487–507. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2003.11.001
Herrera M.J., Lockwood L.J. (1994) The size effect in the Mexican stock market. Journal of Banking & Finance 18(4): 621–632. doi:10.1016/0378-4266(93)00010-M
Hou K., Moskowitz T.J. (2005) Market frictions, price delay, and the cross-section of expected returns. Review of Financial Studies 18(3): 981–1020. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhi023
Hull R.M., Mazachek J., Ockree K.A. (1998) Firm size, common stock offerings, and announcement period returns. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 37(3): 3–24
Ising J., Schiereck D., Simpson M.W., Thomas T.W. (2006) Stock returns following large 1-month declines and jumps: Evidence of overoptimism in the German market. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 46: 598–619. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2006.02.005
James C., Edmister R.O. (1983) The relation between common stock returns, trading activity and market value. The Journal of Finance 38(4): 1075–1086. doi:10.2307/2328012
Karpoff J.M. (1987) The relation between price changes and trading volume: A survey. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22: 109–126. doi:10.2307/2330874
Kim M.K., Burnie D.A. (2002) The firm size effect and the economic cycle. Journal of Financial Research 25(1): 111–124. doi:10.1111/1475-6803.00007
Kousenidis D.V. (2005) Earnings-returns relation in Greece: Some evidence on the size effect and on the life-cycle hypothesis. Managerial Finance 31(2): 24–54. doi:10.1108/03074350510769488
Leledakis G., Davidson I., Karathanassis G. (2003) Cross-sectional estimation of stock returns in small markets: The case of the Athens Stock Exchange. Applied Financial Economics 13: 413–426. doi:10.1080/09603100210143118
Lin B., Wang J.M.C. (2003) Systematic skewness in asset pricing: An empirical examination of the Taiwan stock market. Applied Economics 35: 1877–1887. doi:10.1080/00036840310001628044
Maroney N., Protopapadakis A. (2002) The book-to-market and size effects in a general asset pricing model: Evidence from seven national markets. European Finance Review 6: 189–221. doi:10.1023/A:1020188410677
Mills T.C., Jordanov J.V. (2000) Lead-lag patterns between small and large size portfolios in the London stock exchange. Applied Financial Economics 11: 489–495. doi:10.1080/096031001752236771
Mills T.C., Jordanov J.V. (2003) The size effect and the random walk hypothesis: Evidence from the London Stock Exchange using Markow chains. Applied Financial Economics 13: 807–815. doi:10.1080/0960310032000116224
Moeller S.B., Schlingemann F.P., Stulz R.M. (2004) Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics 73: 201–228. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.07.002
Norris, F., & Peters, J. W. (2007). Wall St. tumble adds to worries about economics. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/28/business/28stox.html?ex=1330405200&en=acfd104dbe67a4f2&ei=5124&partner=digg&exprod=diggei=5124&partner=digg&exprod=digg. Accessed 28 February 2007.
Ovtcharova, G. (2003). Institutional ownership and long-term stock returns. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, June 2003.
Ozenbas D., Schwartz R.A., Wood R.A. (2002) Volatility in US and European equity markets: An assessment of market quality. International Finance 5(3): 437–461
Reinganum M. (1981) Misspecification of capital asset pricing: Empirical anomalies based on earnings yields and market value. Journal of Financial Economics 9: 19–46. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(81)90019-2
Schwert G. (2002) Stock volatility in the new millennium: How wacky is NASDAQ?. Journal of Monetary Economics 49(1): 3–26. doi:10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00099-X
Shell, A., & Waggoner, J. (2007). China volatility sparks U.S. sell-off; Shanghai index gains today. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/2007-02-28-mart-cover-wed-usat_x.htm. Accessed 28 February 2007.
Shevlin T., Shores D. (1993) Firms size, security returns, and unexpected earnings: The anomalous signed-size effect. Contemporary Accounting Research 10(1): 1–30
Stoll H.R., Whaley R.G. (1983) Transactions costs and the small firm effect. Journal of Financial Economics 12: 57–80. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(83)90027-2
Theriou N.G., Maditinos D.I., Chadzoglou P., Anggelidis C. (2005) The cross-section of expected stock returns: An empirical study in the Athens stock exchange. Managerial Finance 31(12): 58–78. doi:10.1108/03074350510770026
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rutledge, R.W., Zhang, Z. & Karim, K. Is There a Size Effect in the Pricing of Stocks in the Chinese Stock Markets?: The Case of Bull Versus Bear Markets. Asia-Pac Finan Markets 15, 117–133 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-008-9074-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-008-9074-0