Skip to main content
Log in

Astronomical site selection for Turkey using GIS techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Experimental Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A site selection of potential observatory locations in Turkey have been carried out by using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) coupled with Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and satellite imagery which in turn reduced cost and time and increased the accuracy of the final outcome. The layers of cloud cover, digital elevation model, artificial lights, precipitable water vapor, aerosol optical thickness and wind speed were studied in the GIS system. In conclusion of MCDA, the most suitable regions were found to be located in a strip crossing from southwest to northeast including also a diverted region in southeast of Turkey. These regions are thus our prime candidate locations for future on-site testing. In addition to this major outcome, this study has also been applied to locations of major observatories sites. Since no goal is set for the best, the results of this study is limited with a list of positions. Therefore, the list has to be further confirmed with on-site tests. A national funding has been awarded to produce a prototype of an on-site test unit (to measure both astronomical and meteorological parameters) which might be used in this list of locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. for 2014: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_optical_reflecting_telescopes

  2. http://modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/

  3. From the astronomical point of view, inversion layer is defined as the elevation where convective motion of warm air is trapped below where the temperature gradient with respect to elevation above the layer remains negative however below the layer it becomes positive.

  4. http://gdem.ersdac.jspacesystems.or.jp/

  5. http://www.mgm.gov.tr/

  6. http://ngdc.noaa.gov/eog/

  7. This outcome has been obtained from a commonly used demographic layer of Turkey. However, since the layer is not fully related to astronomy, it is not included in this study as an active layer.

References

  1. Ardeberg, A.: Site selection for a very large telescope. In: Workshop on ESO’s Very Large Telescope, Cargese, Corse, France, May 16–19, 1983, Proceedings (A84–48051 23-89), pp. 217–254. European Southern Observatory, Garching, West Germany (1983)

  2. Aslan, Z., Aydin, C., Tunca, Z., Demircan, O., Derman, E., Gölbasi, O., Marsoglu, A.: Site testing for an optical observatory in Turkey. Astron. Astrophys. 208, 385–391 (1989)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrare, R., Brasseur, L., Clayton, M., Turner, D., Remer, L., Gao, B.C.: Evaluation of TERRA aerosol and water vapor measurements using ARM SGP data. In: American Meteorological Society 11th Conference on Atmospheric Radiation. 3–7 June 2002, Ogden, Utah (2002)

  4. Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer Science & Business Media, Newyork (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. García-Lorenzo, B., Fuensalida, J.J., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., Mendizabal, E.: Astronomical site ranking based on tropospheric wind statistics 356, 849–858 (2005). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08542.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0410599

  6. Garcia-Lorenzo, B., Eff-Darwich, A., Castro-Almazan, J., Pinilla-Alonso, N., Munoz-Tunon, C., Rodriguez-Espinosa, J.M.: Infrared astronomical characteristics of the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory: precipitable water vapour statistics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 405, 2683–2696 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham, E., Sarazin, M.S., Beniston, M., Collet, C., Hayoz, M., Neun, M., Goyette, S.: Site selection for OWL using past, present, and future climate information. Ground-based Telescopes. In: Oschmann Jr, J. M. (ed.) Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 5489, pp. 102–112 (2004)

  8. Graham, E., Sarazin, M., Beniston, M., Collet, C., Hayoz, M., Neun, M., Casals, P.: Climate-based site selection for a very large telescope using GIS techniques. Meteorol. Appl. 12, 77–81 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham, E., Sarazin, M., Kurlandczyk, H., Neun, M., Matzler, C.: Site selection for extremely large telescopes using the FriOWL software and global re-analysis climate data. Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes II. In: Stepp, L.M., Gilmozzi, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 7012, p 7012 (2008)

  10. Hall, D.K., Riggs, G.A.: Accuracy assessment of the MODIS products. Hydrol. Process. 21, 1534–1547 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hotan, C.E., Tingay, S.J., Glazebrook, K.: Testing potential new sites for optical telescopes in Australia. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 30:ide002 p 11 (2013)

  12. Hudson, K., Simstad, T.: The Share Astronomy Guide to Observatory Site Selection. Neal Street Design Inc. (2010)

  13. Jankowski, P.: Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 9, 251–273 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koç-San, D., San, B.T., Bakis, V., Helvaci, M., Eker, Z.: Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis integrated with GIS and remote sensing for astronomical observatory site selection in Antalya province, Turkey. Adv. Space Res. 52, 39–51 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Küçük, I., Üler, I., Öz, S, Onay, S., Özdemir, A.R., Gülsen, M., Sarikaya, M., Dagtekin, N.D., Özeren, F.F.: Site selection for a radio astronomy observatory in Turkey: atmospherical, meteorological, and radio frequency analyses. Exp. Astron. 33, 1–26 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, L.Y., Yao, Y.Q., Wang, Y.P., Ma, J.L., He, B.L., Wang, H.S.: Seeing measurements for the Guoshoujing Telescope (LAMOST) site with DIMM. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 1061–1070 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J., Rhind, D.W.: Geographic Information Systems and Science, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luo, W., Taylor, M.C., Parker, S.R.: A comparison of spatial interpolation methods to estimate continuous wind speed surfaces using irregularly distributed data from England and Wales. Int. J. Climatol. 28, 947–959 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malczewski, J.: GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 20, 703–726 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parameswaran, K., Krishna-Murthy, B.V.: Altitude profiles of tropospheric water vapor at low latitudes. J. Appl. Meteorol. 29, 665–679 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarazin, M., Tokovinin, A.: The Statistics of Isoplanatic Angle and Adaptive Optics Time Constant derived from DIMM Data. In: Vernet, E, Ragazzoni, R, Esposito, S, Hubin, N (eds.) European Southern Observatory Conference and Workshop Proceedings, European Southern Observatory Conference and Workshop Proceedings, vol. 58, p 321 (2002)

  22. Sarazin, M., Graham, E., Kurlandczyk, H.L.: FriOWL: A site selection tool for the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT) Project. The Messenger 125, 44 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Savtchenko, A., Ouzounov, D., Ahmad, S., Acker, J., Leptoukh, G., Koziana, J., Nickless, D.: Terra and Aqua MODIS products available from NASA GES DAAC. Adv. Space Res. 34, 710–714 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.asr.2004.03.012

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann, J., Rota, S., Ratier, A.: An Introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 83, 977–992 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Siher, E.A., Ortolani, S., Sarazin, M.S., Benkhaldoun, Z.: Correlation between TOMS aerosol index and astronomical extinction. In: Oschmann Jr., J.M. (ed.) Ground-based Telescopes, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 5489, pp. 138–145 (2004), doi:10.1117/12.549804

  26. Turkish State Meteorological Service: Climate of turkey. accessed: February, 2015 (2008). http://www.mgm.gov.tr/files/en-US/climateofturkey.pdf

  27. Varela, A.M., Fuensalida, J.J., Munoz-Tunon, C., Rodriguez Espinosa, J.M., Garcia-Lorenzo, B., Cuevas, E.: Non-correlation between atmospheric extinction coefficient and TOMS aerosol index at the Canarian Observatories. In: Schafer, K.P., Comerón, A., Carleer, M.R., Picard, R.H., Sifakis, N.I. (eds.) Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere IX, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 5571, pp. 105–115 (2004), doi:10.1117/12.565490

  28. Varela, A.M., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., García-Lorenzo, B., Fuensalida, J.J.: Tropospheric wind regimes and site topographical effects: importance for site characterization. In: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 6267, p 1 (2006), doi:10.1117/12.671387

  29. Varela, A.M., Bertolin, C., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., Ortolani, S., Fuensalida, J.J.: Astronomical site selection: on the use of satellite data for aerosol content monitoring 391, 507–520 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13803.x. arXiv:0810.0927

  30. Yassine, C., Adel, G.: PV site suitability analysis using GIS-based spatial fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation. Renew. Energy 36, 2554–2561 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded through the TUBITAK project MFAG-113F266. The authors thank to the Turkish Astronomical Society for the support in establishing the national synergie for the project. Each author thanks to their home university for their support in this national project. We are grateful to the reviewer for their constructive comments and recommendations. The authors thank to: TUG (TUBITAK National Observatory) for its support to the project and usage of its facilities; DAG (Dogu Anadolu Gozlemevi - Eastern Anatolia Observatory) and Atatürk University (through DPT Project No: 2011K120230) for their support in initiating a general GIS solution to the problem and support given to project; Turkish State Meteorological Service for the data sets that they have provided. The authors acknowledge the MODIS Science team for the Science Algorithms, the Processing Team for producing MODIS data, and the GES DAAC MODIS Data Support Team for making MODIS data available to the user community. Image and data processing by NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center. DMSP data collected by US Air Force Weather Agency. ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA.

Nazım Aksaker, Sinan Kaan Yerli, Mehmet Akif Erdoğan, Erdem Erdi, Kazım Kaba, Tansel Ak, Zeki Aslan, Volkan Bakış, Osman Demircan, Serdar Evren, Varol Keskin, İbrahim Küçük, Tuncay Özdemir, Tuncay Özışık, and Selim Osman Selam declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Yerli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aksaker, N., Yerli, S.K., Erdoğan, M.A. et al. Astronomical site selection for Turkey using GIS techniques. Exp Astron 39, 547–566 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-015-9458-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-015-9458-x

Keywords

Navigation