Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predator driven niches vary spatially among co-occurring damselfly species

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining how niche differences contribute to local species coexistence is a vexing problem. Previous work has shown that the ecological and evolutionary processes shaping niche differentiation can vary among populations, suggesting that the strength of niche differences among species should likewise vary geographically. Most tests of this idea compare different species in different locations, not the same species in different locations. Thus, it is unclear whether niche differences vary spatially because of variation in community composition or because populations of the same species experience differences in the strength of niche effects. To test this latter hypothesis, we used field experiments to manipulate the relative abundances of the same pair of Enallagma damselfly species at two lakes. Manipulating relative abundances allowed us to quantify the demographic signature of niche differences that could stabilize coexistence, because if species are niche differentiated, they should experience lower mortality in response to their shared fish predator, and higher growth in the face of resource competition, when rare. We found that both species experienced lower mortality when rare in one location but not the other. No differences in growth were detected, indicating that competition for prey resources may not be a key factor affecting coexistence. These results suggest the species are ecologically differentiated among populations in ways shaping survivorship in response to a shared predator, which should promote their coexistence. We discuss several factors that could contribute to the differences we observed, focusing on the ideas that either (1) niche differentiation between species evolves locally, or that (2) spatial variation in environmental factors affects the manifestation of species niche differences. We therefore argue that the problem of ‘species coexistence’ is not a problem of species, but rather is one of understanding if species’ populations coexist. Such results imply a role for microevolutionary processes in structuring communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler PB, Hillerislambers J, Levine JM (2007) A niche for neutrality. Ecol Lett 10:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen J (1988) Frequency-dependent selection by predators. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 319:485–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassar RD, Simon T, Roberts W, Travis J, Reznick DN (2017) The evolution of coexistence: reciprocal adaptation promotes the assembly of a simple community. Evolution 71:373–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (2001) Neutral macroecology. Science 293:2413–2418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell SA, Johnston EL, Clark GF (2017) Latitudinal variation in the competition-colonisation trade-off reveals rate-mediated mechanisms of coexistence. Ecol Lett 20:947–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1978) Predator-mediated coexistence: a nonequilibrium model. Am Nat 112:127–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Abrams PA, Grover JP, Diehl S, Chesson P, Holt RD, Richards SA, Nisbet RM, Case TJ (2002) The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol Lett 5:302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (2000a) General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theor Popul Biol 58:211–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (2000b) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P, Kuang JJ (2008) The interaction between predation and competition. Nature 456:235–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbet PS (1999) Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of Odonata. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Cothran RD, Noyes P, Relyea RA (2015) An empirical test of stable species coexistence in an amphipod species complex. Oecologia 178:819–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Germain RM, Weir JT, Gilbert B (2016) Species coexistence: macroevolutionary relationships and the contingency of historical interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 283:20160047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germain RM, Williams JL, Schluter D, Angert AL (2017) Moving character displacement beyond characters using contemporary coexistence theory. Trends Ecol Evol 33:74–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haney S, Cattivera M, Siepielski A (2015) Rare niches and the ecological equivalence of species. Theor Ecol 8:491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SP, Usinowicz J, Levine JM (2017) The spatial scales of species coexistence. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HilleRisLambers J, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Levine JM, Mayfield MM (2012) Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43(43):227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RA, Lawton J (1994) The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:495–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography (MPB-32). Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • LaManna JA, Mangan SA, Alonso A, Bourg NA, Brockelman WY, Bunyavejchewin S, Chang L-W, Chiang J-M, Chuyong GB, Clay K (2017) Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale. Science 356:1389–1392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lankau RA (2011) Rapid evolutionary change and the coexistence of species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA (1996) A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. Am Nat 147:784–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Chase JM (2017) Metacommunity ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard J-P, Belmaker J, Myers JA, Chase JM, Rahbek C (2012) Inferring local ecological processes amid species pool influences. Trends Ecol Evol 27:600–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J (2008) On testing the role of niche differences in stabilizing coexistence. Funct Ecol 22:934–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Bascompte J, Adler PB, Allesina S (2017) Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature 546:56–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TE (1988) On the advantage of being different: nest predation and the coexistence of bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 85:2196–2199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1989) Differential dispersal tendencies among Enallagma damselflies (Odonata) inhabiting different habitats. Oikos 56:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1990) Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damsefly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1996) Trade-offs, food web structure, and the coexistence of habitat specialists and generalists. Am Nat 148:S124–S138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1998) The consequences of changing the top predator in a food web: a comparative experimental approach. Ecol Monogr 68:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (2004) The growth/predation risk trade-off: so what is the mechanism? Am Nat 163:E88–E111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (2017) Evolutionary community ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA, Brown JM (2000) Building a regional species pool: diversification of the Enallagma damselflies in eastern North America. Ecology 81:904–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA, Peckarsky BL (1998) Life histories and the strengths of species interactions: combining mortality, growth, and fecundity effects. Ecology 79:867–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA, Grace JM, Richardson JML (2001) Physiological and behavioral responses to predators shpae the growth/predation risk trade-off in damselflies. Ecology 82:1535–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JR, Kassen R (2007) The effects of competition and predation on diversification in a model adaptive radiation. Nature 446:432–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG (1988) Competition among refuging sunfishes and effects of fish density on littoral zone invertebrates. Ecology 69:614–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG (2012) Community ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosil P, Villoutreix R, de Carvalho CF, Farkas TE, Soria-Carrasco V, Feder JL, Crespi BJ, Gompert Z (2018) Natural selection and the predictability of evolution in Timema stick insects. Science 359:765–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ousterhout BH, Graham SR, Hasik AZ, Serrano M, Siepielski AM (2018) Past selection impacts the strength of an aquatic trophic cascade. Funct Ecol 32:1554–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson A, Soberón J, Sánchez-Cordero V (1999) Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf VH (2007) The interaction of cannibalism and omnivory: consequences for community dynamics. Ecology 88:2697–2705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shama LNS, Campero-Paz M, Wegner K, De Block M, Stoks R (2011) Latitudinal and voltinism compensation shape thermal reaction norms for growth rate. Mol Ecol 20:2929–2941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shmida A, Ellner S (1984) Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58:29–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski AM, McPeek MA (2010) On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program. Ecology 91:3153–3164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski AM, McPeek MA (2013) Niche versus neutrality in structuring the beta diversity of damselfly assemblages. Freshw Biol 58:758–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski AM, Hung KL, Bein EEB, McPeek MA (2010) Experimental evidence for neutral community dynamics governing an insect assemblage. Ecology 91:847–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski AM, Mertens AN, Wilkinson BL, McPeek MA (2011) Signature of ecological partitioning in the maintenance of damselfly diversity. J Anim Ecol 80:1163–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski AM, Wang J, Prince G (2014) Nonconsumptive predator-driven mortality causes natural selection on prey. Evolution 68:696–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski AM, Nemirov A, Cattivera M, Nickerson A (2016) Experimental evidence for an eco-evolutionary coupling between local adaptation and intraspecific competition. Am Nat 187:447–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski AM, Hasik AZ, Ousterhout BH (2018) An ecological and evolutionary perspective on species coexistence under global change. Curr Opin Insect Sci 29:71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoks R, McPeek MA (2006) A tale of two diversifications: reciprocal habitat shifts to fill ecological space along the pond permanence gradient. Am Nat 168(Suppl 6):S50–S72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strobbe F, McPeek MA, De Block M, Stoks R (2011) Fish predation selects for reduced foraging activity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud JT, Losos JB (2016) Ecological opportunity and adaptive radiation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 47:507–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson E, Gomez-Llano M, Torres A, Bensch H (2018) Frequency-dependence and ecological drift shape coexistence of species with similar niches. Am Nat 191:691–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swaegers J, Strobbe F, McPeek M, Stoks R (2017) Selection on escape performance during ecological speciation driven by predation. Anim Behav 124:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DJ (1978) The natural prey of larvae of the damselfly, Ischnura elegans (Odonata: zygoptera). Freshw Biol 8:377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (2005) The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH, Covich AP (2009) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Usinowicz J, Chang-Yang C-H, Chen Y-Y, Clark JS, Fletcher C, Garwood NC, Hao Z, Johnstone J, Lin Y, Metz MR (2017) Temporal coexistence mechanisms contribute to the latitudinal gradient in forest diversity. Nature 550:105–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vance RR (1978) Predation and resource partitioning in one predator-two prey model communities. Am Nat 112:797–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westfall MJ, May ML (2006) Damselflies of North America, Rev edn. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JJ (2004) Speciation and ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species. Evolution 58:193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger SA (1992) Niche overlap and the potential for competition and intraguild predation between size-structured populations. Ecology 73:1431–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Bassar, J. Beaulieu, R. Germain, J. P. Lessard, B. Ousterhout, J. Usinowicz, and several anonymous reviewers from previous submissions for thoughtful comments on earlier versions. Conversations with Mark McPeek were especially insightful on the ideas presented here. We also thank Gary Mittelbach and Kellogg Biological Station for allowing access to their facilities. Earl Werner kindly granted us access to Lake Palmatier. M. Chrietzberg, S. Graham, A. Hasik, A. Heffington, B. Ousterhout, A. E. Siepielski, L. Siepielski, J. Senn, and M. Serrano helped with picking bugs and building experimental cages. This work was supported by NSF (DEB 1620046, 1748945) awarded to AMS.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jason T. Bried

    Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Murray State University, Murray, KY, 42071, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, SCEN 601, 850 W. Dickson St., Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA

    Adam M. Siepielski

Authors
  1. Jason T. Bried
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adam M. Siepielski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam M. Siepielski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data accessibility

All data will be deposited at Datadryad.

Ethical statement

We adhered to all animal care guidelines pertaining to the use of fish in our experiments as set forth under approval of the University of Arkansas IACUC (#17059).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bried, J.T., Siepielski, A.M. Predator driven niches vary spatially among co-occurring damselfly species. Evol Ecol 33, 243–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-019-09975-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-019-09975-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation