Abstract
This article examines the fertility preferences of Latin American adolescents of the 1.5 generation and their native peers in Spain. We compare their expected age at first birth as well as their expected family size. The fertility preferences of the 1.5 generation are likely to reflect the family values of two different socialization environments as well as the adaptation process to the childbearing norms of the host society. The analysis is based on the Chances Survey, which collected data from 2700 adolescents in secondary schools in Madrid in 2011. Results indicate that fertility timing preferences of Latin American adolescents reflect socialization influences from the society of origin, but also a quick adaptation to the childbearing norms in the host society, since their expected age at first birth is somewhat earlier than that of their Spanish peers but considerably later than that prevailing in their country of origin. The degree of social integration, measured by the number of the respondent’s best friends who were Spanish, seems more important than age at migration for diminishing the gap between Latin Americans and Spaniards. Moreover, higher educational expectations are associated with preferences for postponed entry into parenthood. With regard to family size expectations, we find no significant variation between adolescents of migrant and native origin, confirming the argument that the “two-child norm” currently prevails in both middle- and high-income countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The terms 1.5 generation and child migrants are used interchangeably throughout this article. Both terms refer to individuals who were born abroad and who migrated (with one/both parents or following them) during childhood or adolescence.
The median age at first birth hovers around 21–22 in Bolivia, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador and Peru, according to Demographic and Health Survey data (Table 1). Only women with tertiary education display a later age at first birth, ranging from 23.8 in the Dominican Republic to 27.2 in Colombia. Nevertheless, even among Latin American women with university studies age at first birth is considerably earlier than among Spanish women with tertiary education (mean age of 33.6 in 2014).
In 2011, the unemployment rate among extra-EU migrants (34.6%) was well above that of Spaniards (19.7%). Similarly, the wage gap between immigrants and natives has also broadened with the economic crisis (Martínez-Molina et al. 2014).
The data collection was carried out under the framework of the Chances Project: Aspirations, expectations and life-course orientations of immigrant and non-immigrant origin youth in Spain. The role of the social context and intergenerational conflict. The research project and the data collection were co-directed by Amparo González-Ferrer (CSIC) and Héctor Cebolla-Boado (UNED). http://chancesproject.es.
At the time of the 2011 Census, the overall share of the foreign-born population in Madrid was 17%. The Latin America-born population represented 57% of the total immigrant population in Madrid (Instituto Nacional de Estadística 2011).
In addition to the students’ questionnaire, the parents completed a parallel questionnaire at home. However, parental response rates were low: 38.8% among immigrant-origin parents and 48.5% among native parents.
Logistic regression models predicting the likelihood of a missing response in expected age at first child, and controlling for the same covariates as in the full model of Table 5, show that boys and native students are slightly more likely not to provide an answer.
We could not distinguish between these two groups, as this variable would be highly correlated with the measure for origin. Additional analyses focusing only on migrants showed no statistically significant differences in expected fertility timing by age at migration.
A multinomial logit analysis to examine the propensity to depart from the two-child norm was also performed, but substantial conclusions did not change.
These numbers are relatively close to those recorded at the national level. According to PISA-2012, the percentage of immigrant students that have repeated at least a year of school before the age of 15 (54.9%) is much higher than among native students (30%) (Calero and Escardíbul 2016).
The relatively high rates of abortion among Latin American women residing in Spain suggest a high incidence of unwanted pregnancy. According to data from the Ministry of Health, 24% of all induced abortions in Spain during 2014 were to Latin American women.
References
Adserà, A., & Ferrer, A. M. (2014). Fertility adaptation of child migrants to Canada. Population Studies, 68(1), 65–79. doi:10.1080/00324728.2013.802007.
Adserà, A., Ferrer, A. M., Sigle-Rushton, W., & Wilson, B. (2012). Fertility patterns of child migrants: Age at migration and ancestry in comparative perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 643, 160–189. doi:10.1177/0002716212444706.
Andersson, G. (2004). Childbearing after migration: Fertility patterns of foreign-born women in Sweden. International Migration Review, 38(2), 747–775.
Aparicio, R. (2007). The integration of the second and 1.5 generations of Moroccan, Dominican and Peruvian origin in Madrid and Barcelona. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(7), 1169–1193. doi:10.1080/13691830701541713.
Azzolini, D., Schnell, P., & Palmer, J. (2012). Educational achievement gaps between immigrant and native students in two “new” immigration countries: Italy and Spain in comparison. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 643(1), 46–77. doi:10.1177/0002716212441590.
Balbo, N., & Barban, N. (2014). Does fertility behavior spread among friends? American Sociological Review, 79(3), 412–431. doi:10.1177/0003122414531596.
Barber, J. S. (2001). Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(2), 101. doi:10.2307/3090128.
Bernardi, F., Garrido, L., & Miyar, M. (2011). The recent fast upsurge of immigrants in Spain and their employment patterns and occupational attainment. International Migration, 49(1), 148–187. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00610.x.
Berrington, A., & Pattaro, S. (2014). Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions and behaviour: A life course perspective. Advances in Life Course Research, 21, 10–27. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2013.12.003.
Bongaarts, J., & Blanc, A. K. (2015). Estimating the current mean age of mothers at the birth of their first child from household surveys. Population Health Metrics, 13(25), 1–6. doi:10.1186/s12963-015-0058-9.
Bueno García, X., & Vono de Vilhena, D. (2009). Pautas reproductivas de las madres latinoamericanas en Estados Unidos y España a inicios del siglo XXI. Diálogos Latinoamericanos, 15, 94–114.
Calero, J., & Escardíbul, J. O. (2016). Skills acquisition in immigrant and non-immigrant students. Barcelona: Social Observatory of La Caixa.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Castro-Martín, T., & Martín-García, T. (2013). The fertility gap in Spain: Late parenthood, few children and unfulfilled reproductive desires. In G. Esping-Andersen (Ed.), The fertility gap in Europe: Singularities of the Spanish case (Social Stu., pp. 45–81). Barcelona: La Caixa Foundation.
Castro-Martín, T., & Rosero-Bixby, L. (2011). Maternidades y fronteras: La fecundidad de las mujeres inmigrantes en España. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69(1), 105–137.
Cebolla-Boado, H., González-Ferrer, A., & Soysal, Y. (2013). The interplay between families and schools: Immigrant and native differentials in educational outcomes (No. 280). Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales Working Papers. Madrid. http://digital.march.es/ceacs-ir/es/fedora/repository/ir%3A10081.
Consejería de Educación y Empleo. (2012). Estadística de la Enseñanza de la Comunidad de Madrid. Curso 2009–2010. Datos definitivos. http://goo.gl/trkqDo.
De Valk, H. A. G. (2013). Intergenerational discrepancies in fertility preferences among immigrant and Dutch families. The History of the Family, 18(2), 209–225.
De Valk, H. A. G., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2007a). Timing preferences for women’s family-life transitions: Intergenerational transmission among migrants and Dutch. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(1), 190–206.
De Valk, H. A. G., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2007b). Parental influence on union formation preferences among Turkish, Moroccan and Dutch adolescents in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(4), 487–505.
De Valk, H. A. G., & Milewski, N. (2011). Family life transitions among children of immigrants: An introduction. Advances in Life Course Research, 16(4), 145–151. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2011.10.001.
Del Rey, A., & Grande, R. (2015). Longitudinal analysis of reproductive behavior. In A. Domingo Valls, A. Sabater Coll, & R. R. Verdugo (Eds.), Demographic analysis of Latin American immigrants in Spain. From boom to bust? (pp. 133–153). Cham: Springer.
Feliciano, C. (2005). Unequal origins. Immigrant selection and the education of the second generation. El Paso: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
Fussell, E., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2005). The transition to adulthood during the twentieth century: Race, nativity, and gender. In R. A. Settersten, F. F. Furstenberg, & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research and public pol (pp. 29–75). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gabrielli, L. (2015). Corridor Report on Spain—The case of Ecuadorian and Moroccan Immigrants. INTERACT Research Report/ Corridor Report No. 2015/15.
González-Ferrer, A. (2011). Spousal reunification among recent immigrants in Spain: Links with undocumented migration and the labour market. In A. Kraler, E. Kofman, M. Kohli, & C. Schmoll (Eds.), Gender, generations and the family in international migration. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.13140/2.1.3590.5924.
González-Ferrer, A., Castro-Martín, T., & Kraus, E. (2014). Does religiosity matter for partnership and fertility aspirations? A comparison of immigrant and native adolescents in Madrid. In WIREL conference. Religion in Vienna: Urban Trends in a European Context. Vienna.
González-Ferrer, A., Castro-Martín, T., & Kraus, E. (2015a). Childbearing among women of immigrant and non-immigrant origin in Spain. Country-specific case studies on fertility among the descendants of immigrants (Part 2) (No. 39). Families & Societies Working Paper Series. www.familiesandsocieties.eu.
González-Ferrer, A., Kraus, E., Fernández, M., Cebolla-Boado, H., Soysal, Y., & Aratani, Y. (2015b). Adolescents’ life plans in the city of Madrid. Are immigrant origins of any importance? Metamorfosis Revista del Centro Reina Sofía sobre Adolescencia y Juventud, 2, 25–49.
Hartnett, C. S., & Parrado, E. A. (2012). Hispanic familism reconsidered: Ethnic differences in perceived value of children and fertility intentions. The Sociological Quarterly, 53(4), 636–653. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2012.01252.x.
Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86(3), 1163–1188. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0000.
Heaton, T. B., Forste, R., & Otterstrom, S. M. (2002). Family transitions in Latin America: First intercourse, first union and first birth. International Journal of Population Geography, 8(1), 1–15. doi:10.1002/ijpg.234.
Holland, J. A., & De Valk, H. A. G. (2013). Ideal ages for family formation among immigrants in Europe. Advances in Life Course Research, 18(4), 257–269. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2013.08.002.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2011). Population and Housing Census Spain. https://goo.gl/4FwpYN.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2016). Continuous Register Statistics. https://goo.gl/fzcVdY.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (2010). Population and Housing Census Ecuador. http://www.inec.gob.ec/estadisticas/.
Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1998). Educational aspirations of minority youth. American Journal of Education, 106(3), 349–384.
Kulu, H. (2005). Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined. European Journal of Population, 21(1), 51–87. doi:10.1007/s10680-005-3581-8.
Kulu, H., & González-Ferrer, A. (2014). Family dynamics among immigrants and their descendants in Europe: Current research and opportunities. European Journal of Population, 30, 411–435. doi:10.1007/s10680-014-9322-0.
Kulu, H., Hannemann, T., Pailhé, A., Neels, K., Rahnu, L., Puur, A., et al. (2015). A comparative study on fertility among the descendants of immigrants in Europe (No. 40). Families & Societies Working Paper Series. www.familiesandsocieties.eu.
Lindstrom, D. P. (2003). Rural-urban migration and reproductive behavior in Guatemala. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(4), 351–372. doi:10.1023/A:1027336615298.
Lindstrom, D. P., & Giorguli-Saucedo, S. (2002). The short- and long-term effects of U.S. migration experience on Mexican women’s fertility. Social Forces, 80(4), 1341–1368.
Martínez-Molina, S., Monsonís-Payá, I., Valía-Cotanda, E., Durá, E., Ródenas, F., & Garcés, J. (2014). National report on the labour market position of vulnerable groups in Spain. Valencia: University of Valencia.
Massey, D. S., & Capoferro, C. (2006). Salvese quien pueda: Structural adjustment and emigration from Lima. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 606(1), 116–127. doi:10.1177/0002716206288105.
Milewski, N. (2007). First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation? Demographic Research, 17(859–896), 2007. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.29.
Milewski, N. (2010). Immigrant fertility in West Germany: Is there a socialization effect in transitions to second and third births? European Journal of Population, 26(3), 297–323. doi:10.1007/s10680-010-9211-0.
Milewski, N. (2011). Transition to a first birth among Turkish second-generation migrants in Western Europe. Advances in Life Course Research, 16(4), 178–189. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2011.09.002.
Miller, W. B. (2011). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9(1), 75–98. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s75.
Miller, W. B., Rodgers, J. L., & Pasta, D. J. (2010). Fertility motivations of youth predict later fertility outcomes: A prospective analysis of national longitudinal survey of youth data. Biodemography and Social Biology, 56(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/19485561003709131.THE.
Morgan, S. P. (2001). Should fertility intentions inform fertility forecasts? The direction of fertility in the United States. In The direction of fertility in the United States. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
Morgan, S. P., & Rackin, H. M. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 36(1), 91–118. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00319.x.
Nathan, M., Pardo, I., & Cabella, W. (2016). Diverging patterns of fertility decline in Uruguay. Demographic Research, 34(20), 563–586. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2016.34.20.
Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Beaujouan, É. (2011). Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979–2007. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s99.
Nimmerfeldt, G., Schulze, J., & Taru, M. (2013). The relationship between integration dimensions among second generation Russians in Estonia. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 3(1), 76–91.
Oso Casas, L. (2010). An overview of gender and migration in Spain: From the presence of feminised migration flows to a greater gender balance. https://goo.gl/yc4flJ.
Parrado, E. A., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Intergenerational fertility among Hispanic women: New evidence of immigrant assimilation. Demography, 45(3), 651–671. doi:10.1353/dem.0.0023.
Plotnick, R. D. (2007). Adolescent expectations and desires about marriage and parenthood. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 943–963. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.01.003.
Portes, A., Aparicio, R., Haller, W., & Vickstrom, E. (2010). Moving ahead in Madrid: Aspirations and expectations in the Spanish second generation. International Migration Review, 44(4), 767–801. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00825.x.
Rackin, H. M., & Bachrach, C. A. (2014). Assessing the predictive value of fertility expectations through a cognitive-social model (No. 13). Maryland Population Research Center, Working Paper.
Régnier-Loilier, A. (2006). Influence of own sibship size on the number of children desired at various times of life: The case of France. Population (English edition), 61(3), 165–194.
Rodríguez-Vignoli, J., & Cavenaghi, S. (2014). Adolescent and youth fertility and social inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean: What role has education played? Genus, 70(1), 1–25. doi:10.4402/genus-543.
Roig Vila, M., & Castro-Martín, T. (2007). Childbearing patterns of foreign women in a new immigration country. Population (English edition), 62(3), 351–379. doi:10.3917/pope.703.0351.
Rosero-Bixby, L., Castro-Martín, T., & Martín-García, T. (2009). Is Latin America starting to retreat from early and universal childbearing? Demographic Research, 20(9), 169–194. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.9.
Salikutluk, Z. (2016). Why do immigrant students aim high? Explaining the aspiration–achievement paradox of immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32(5), 581–592. doi:10.1093/esr/jcw004.
Sedgh, G., Ashford, L. S., & Hussain, R. (2016). Unmet need for contraception in developing countries: Examining women’s reasons for not using a method. Guttmacher Report. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
Singley, S. G., & Landale, N. S. (1998). Incorporating origin and process in migration-fertility frameworks: The case of Puerto Rican women. Social Forces, 76(4), 1437–1464.
Sobotka, T., & Beaujouan, É. (2014). Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Population and Development Review, 40(3), 391–419. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x.
Starrels, M. E., & Holm, K. E. (2000). Adolescents’ plans for family formation: Is parental socialization important? Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 416–429.
Testa, M. R. (2014). On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: Individual- and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research, 21, 28–42. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.005.
Trent, K. (1994). Family context and adolescents’ fertility expectations. Youth & Society, 26(1), 118–137.
Walker, J. R. (2001). Adolescents’ expectations regarding birth outcomes: A comparison of the NLSY79 and NLSY97 cohorts. In R. T. Michael (Ed.), Social awakening: Adolescent behavior as adulthood approaches (pp. 201–229). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
Westoff, C. F., & Bankole, A. (2002). Reproductive preferences in developing countries at the turn of the century. DHS Comparative Reports No. 2. Calverton, MD. http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/CR2/CR2.pdf.
Wolf, K. (2016). Marriage migration versus family reunification: How does the marriage and migration history affect the timing of first and second childbirth among Turkish immigrants in Germany? European Journal of Population, 32(5), 731–759. doi:10.1007/s10680-016-9402-4.
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results has received funding from CSIC, Juan March Institute and Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, under Grant Agreement CSO2012-35234, for the Chances Project “Aspirations, expectations and life-course orientations of immigrant and non-immigrant origin youth in Spain. The role of the social context and intergenerational conflict”, co-directed by Amparo González-Ferrer and Héctor Cebolla-Boado. Additional funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement 320116 for the research project FamiliesAndSocieties is also gratefully acknowledged. We are very grateful for the comments and support given by Amparo González-Ferrer and for the useful suggestions of anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kraus, E.K., Castro-Martín, T. Does Migrant Background Matter for Adolescents’ Fertility Preferences? The Latin American 1.5 Generation in Spain. Eur J Population 34, 277–312 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9427-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9427-3