Abstract
This paper will address the question of the morality of technology. I believe this is an important question for our contemporary society in which technology, especially information technology, is increasingly becoming the default mode of social ordering. I want to suggest that the conventional manner of conceptualising the morality of technology is inadequate – even dangerous. The conventional view of technology is that technology represents technical means to achieve social ends. Thus, the moral problem of technology, from this perspective, is the way in which the given technical means are applied to particular (good or bad) social ends. In opposition to this I want to suggest that the assumed separation, of this approach, between technical means and social ends are inappropriate. It only serves to hide the most important political and ethical dimensions of technology. I want to suggest that the morality of technology is much more embedded and implicit than such a view would suggest. In order to critique this approach I will draw on phenomenology and the more recent work of Bruno Latour. With these intellectual resources in mind I will propose disclosive ethics as a way to make the morality of technology visible. I will give a brief account of this approach and show how it might guide our␣understanding of the ethics and politics of technology by considering two examples of contemporary information technology: search engines and plagiarism detection systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achterhuis H. (1995) De moralisering van de apparaten. Socialisme en Democratie 52(1):3–12
Berg A., Lie M. (1995) Feminism and Constructivism: Do Artifacts Have Gender? Science, Technology and Human Values 20(3):332–351
Bijker W.E. (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge MA, MIT Press
Bijker W.E., Hughes T.P., Pinch T.J. (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Borgmann A. (1984) Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. Chicago, IL, Chicago University Press
Bowker G.C., Star S.L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Brey P. (1997) Philosophy of Technology meets Social Constructivism, Techné. Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology 2(3/4):56–79
Brey P. (1999) The Ethics of Representation and Action in Virtual Reality. Ethics and Information Technology 1(1):5–14
Brey P. (2004) Ethical Aspects of Face Recognition Systems in Public Places. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 2(2):97–109
Callon M. (1987) Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis. In: Bijker W.E., Hughes T.P., Pinch T.J. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge,MA, MIT Press, pp. 83–103
Caputo J.D. (1993) Against Ethics. Indianapolis, Indiana University Press
J. Cho, H. Garcia-Molina, and L. Page. Efficient crawling through URL ordering, Paper presented at the Seventh International World Wide Web Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 14–18 April 1998
Conley T. (2005) Folds and Folding. In: Stivale C.J. (ed), Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 170–181
Critchley S. (1999) The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas, 2nd edition. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press
Critchley S. (2004) Is There a Normative Deficit in the Theory of Hegemony?. In Critchley S., Marchant O. (eds), Laclau: A Critical Reader. London, Routledge, pp. 113–122
Foucault M. (1994) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London, Routledge
Friedman B., Nissenbaum H. (1996) Bias in Computer Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14(3):330–347
Graham S, Wood D. (2003) Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, Space and inequality. Critical Social Policy 20(2):227–248
M. Heidegger, Being and Time, trans John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York, Harper and Row (1927/1962)
Heidegger M. (1977) The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York, Harper Torchbooks
Howard R.M. (1995) Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty. College English 57(1):788–805
Howard R.M. (1993) A Plagiarism Pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing 11(2):233–245
L.D. Introna. Oppression, Resistance and Information Technology: Some Thoughts on Design and Values, Design for Values. Ethical, Social and Political Dimensions of Information Technology workshop sponsored by the NSF DIMACS, Princeton University, USA, 27 February to 1 March, 1998
L.D. Introna. On the Ethics of (Object) Things. paper presented at the Critical Management Conference 3, Lancaster University, England, 17–19 July 2004. Available at http://www.lums.lancs.ac.uk/publications/viewpdf/000235/ (Last accessed on 18/07/2006)
Introna L.D., Ilharco F.M. (2006) The Meaning of Screens: Towards a Phenomenological Account of Screenness. Human Studies 29(1):57–76
Introna L.D., Nissenbaum H. (2000) The Internet as a Democratic Medium: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters. The Information Society, 16(3):169–85
L.D. Introna and L. Whittaker. Power, Cash and Convenience: Translations in the Political Site of the ATM. The Information Society, 22(5): 325–340, 2006
Introna L.D., Wood D. (2004) Picturing Algorithmic Surveillance: The Politics of Facial Recognition Systems. Surveillance and Society 2(2/3):177–98
Lathrop A. (2000) Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era: A Wake-up Call. Englewood CO, Libraries Unlimited
Latour B. (1992) Where are the Missing Masses? Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts. In: Bijker W., Law J. (eds), Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, pp. 225–258
Latour B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
B. Latour. The Promise of Constructivism. In D. Ihde and E. Selinger, editors, Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality, pp. 27–46. Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 2003
Latour B. (1991) Technology is Society made Durable. In Law J. (eds), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power. Technology and Domination, London, Routledge, pp. 103–31
Latour B. (2002) Morality and Technology: The End of the Means. Theory, Culture and Society 19(5/6):247–60
Law J. (1991) The Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power. Technology and Domination, London, Routledge
S. Lawrence and C.L. Giles, Accessibility and Distribution of Information on the Web, 1999
Leki I., Carson J. (1997) Completely Different Worlds: EAP and the Writing Experiences of ESL Students in University Courses. TESOL Quarterly 31(1):39–69
D.A. Norman. The Psychology of Every day Things. Basic Books, New York, NY, 1988
Pfaffenberger B. (1992) Technological Dramas. Science, Technology, and Human Values 17:282–312
Roig M. (2001) Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors. Ethics and Behavior 11(3):307–323
Schatzki T.R. (2005) The Sites of Organizations. Organization Studies 26(3):465–484
Schatzki T.R. (2002) The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park Penn, Pennsylvania University Press
S. Schleimer, D. Wilkerson and A. Aiken (2003) Winnowing: Local Algorithms for Document Fingerprinting. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, June 2003, 76–85
Shi L. (2004) Textual Borrowing in Second-Language Writing. Written Communication 21(2):171–200
Sismondo S. (1993) Some Social Constructions. Social Studies of Science 23(3):515–553
Verbeek P.P. (2005) What Things Do – Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State, Penn State University Press
Verbeek P.P. (2006) Materializing Morality – Design Ethics and Technological Mediation. Science, Technology and Human Values 31(3):361–380
Winner L. (1993) Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding it Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values 18(3):362–78
J. Woodward, C. Horn, J. Gatune and A. Thomas. Biometrics: A Look at Facial Recognition. Documented Briefing prepared for the Virginia State Crime Commission (2003). Available at http://www.rand.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Introna, L.D. Maintaining the reversibility of foldings: Making the ethics (politics) of information technology visible. Ethics Inf Technol 9, 11–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9133-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9133-z