Skip to main content
Log in

Skepticism, Information, and Closure: Dretske’s Theory of Knowledge

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to Fred Dretske’s externalist theory of knowledge a subject knows that p if and only if she believes that p and this belief is caused or causally sustained by the information that p. Another famous feature of Dretske’s epistemology is his denial that knowledge is closed under known logical entailment. I argue that, given Dretske’s construal of information, he is in fact committed to the view that both information and knowledge are closed under known entailment. This has far-reaching consequences. For if it is true that, as Dretske also believes, accepting closure leads to skepticism, he must either embrace skepticism or abandon his information theory of knowledge. The latter alternative would seem to be preferable. But taking this route would deprive one of the most powerfully developed externalist epistemologies of its foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Audi (1988) Belief, Justification, and Knowledge Wadsworth Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • A.C.J. Barke (2002) The Closure of Knowledge in Context Mentis Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Brueckner (1985) ArticleTitle‘Skepticism and Epistemic Closure’ Philosophical Topics 13 89–117

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Cohen (1988) ArticleTitle‘How to be a Fallibilist’ Philosophical Perspectives 2 91–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.: 2000, ‘Contextualism and Skepticism’, Philosophical Issues10: Skepticism, edited by E. Sosa and E. Villanueva, 94–107.

  • K. DeRose (1995) ArticleTitleSolving the Skeptical Problem The Philosophical Review 104 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • K. DeRose T. Warfield (Eds) (1999) Skepticism–A Contemporary Reader Oxford University Press New York, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • F.I. Dretske (1970) ArticleTitle‘Epistemic Operators’ The Journal of Philosophy 67 1002–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • F.I. Dretske (1971) ArticleTitle‘Conclusive Reasons’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • F.I. Dretske (1972) ArticleTitle‘Contrastive Statements’ The Philosophical Review 81 411–430

    Google Scholar 

  • F.I. Dretske (1981a) Knowledge and the Flow of Information Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • F.I. Dretske (1981b) ArticleTitle‘The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge’ Philosophical Issues 40 363–378

    Google Scholar 

  • F.I. Dretske (1983) ArticleTitle‘Précis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information’, ‘Open Peer Commentary’, and ‘Author’s Response’ The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 55–90 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0140525X00014631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. I.: 1991, ‘Dretske’s Replies’, in McLaughlin 1991, 180–221

  • F.I. Dretske (2000) Perception, Knowledge, and Belief–Selected Essays Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • F.I. Dretske (2004) ArticleTitle‘Externalism and Modest Contextualism’ Erkenntnis 61 173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. I.: Forthcoming, ‘The Case Against Closure’, in E. Sosa and M. Steup (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

  • R. Feldman (1995) ArticleTitle‘In Defence of Closure’ Philosophical Quarterly 45 487–494

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Foley (1987) ArticleTitle‘Dretske’s ‘Information Theoretic’ Account of Knowledge’ Synthese 70 159–184

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Greco (2000) Putting Skeptics in Their Place Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • St. D. Hales (1995) ArticleTitleEpistemic Closure Principles The Southern Journal of Philosophy XXXIII 185–201 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.2041-6962.1995.tb00739.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Heller (1999) ArticleTitle‘Relevant Alternatives and Closure’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 196–208

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Klein (1995) ArticleTitle‘Skepticism and Closure: Why the Evil Genius Argument Fails’ Philosophical Topics 23 213–236

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lewis (1996) ArticleTitleElusive Knowledge Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 549–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Luper, St.: 2001: ‘Epistemic Closure Principles’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/closure-epistemic/.

  • B.P. McLaughlin (Eds) (1991) Dretske and His Critics Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Plantinga (1993) Warrant: The Current Debate Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Vogel (1990) Are There Counterexamples to the Closure Principle? M. Roth G. Ross (Eds) Doubting: Contemporary Perspectives on Skepticism Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Williams (1996) Unnatural Doubts–Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Skepticism Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Jäger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jäger, C. Skepticism, Information, and Closure: Dretske’s Theory of Knowledge. Erkenntnis 61, 187–201 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-004-9283-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-004-9283-5

Keywords

Navigation