Skip to main content
Log in

Factors influencing the performance of faecal sludge management services: case study in Thailand municipalities

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most low- and middle-income countries, the service coverage of faecal sludge management is very limited resulting in uncontrolled disposal that directly impacts to water resources and public health. Similar to other countries, Thailand is facing faecal sludge management problems which lead to serious challenge to its local government authorities who are responsible for services provision. Local factors may strongly affect faecal sludge management services. Because of this problem, the management measures should be formulated in responding to significant factors affecting the performance of FSM services. This study aimed to evaluate existing faecal sludge management services in Thailand, their strengths, and weaknesses, and identify the significant factors influencing the performance of services. Based on data collected from 160 municipalities in Thailand, factors influencing the faecal sludge management services were identified using multiple regression analysis. The indicators involving operational efficiency, service performance, and treatment feasibility were used for the assessment of faecal sludge management performance. Significant factors encompassing technical, financial, social, and institutional aspects were identified based on each indicator. The findings identified the significant factors and proposed effective measures for improving faecal sludge management services such as providing technical assistance, implementing awareness programmes for private operators and households, and subsidizing investment and operation costs of faecal sludge management facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassan, M., Mbeguere, M., Tchonda, T., Zabsonre, F., & Strande, L. (2013). Integrated faecal sludge management scheme for the cities of Burkina Faso. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 3(2), 216–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Business analysis of faecal sludge management: Emptying and transportation services in Africa and Asia. Draft Final Report.

  • Boot, N.L.D., & Scott, R.E. (2008). Faecal sludge management in Accra, Ghana: Strengthening links in the chain. Report of the 33rd WEDC International Conference, Accra, Ghana.

  • Canadian Water and Wastewater Association and the CWWA Water Efficiency Network. (2009). Water conservation and efficiency performance measures and benchmarks within the municipal sector: An identification of current practices and assessment of the feasibility of expanding their use. A report produced for the Ontario Ministry of Environment.

  • Chokewinyoo, P. (2008). Lessons learned and strategies on Septage Management in Thailand. Paper Presented at the Regional Symposium-cum-Training Workshop on Sustainable Septage Management in Asia and Pacific. Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Christoph, L., Panesar, A., Schutze, T., Norstrom, A., McConville, J., Parkinson, J., et al. (2011). Sustainable sanitation in cities: A framework for action. Rijswijk: Papiroz Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSE. (2011). Policy paper on Septage Management in India. Report of the Centre for Science and Environment. Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, India.

  • Eawag/Sandec. (2006). Urban excreta management-situation, challenges, and promising solutions. 1st International Faecal Sludge Management Policy Symposium and Workshop. Report of the Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries. Eawag/Sandec, Switzerland.

  • Frenoux, C., & Tsitsikalis, A. (2014). Domestic private fecal sludge emptying services in Cambodia: Between market efficiency and regulation needs for sustainable management. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 5(1), 143–155.

  • Gaulke, L. S. (2006). On-site wastewater treatment and reuses in Japan. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 159(2), 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, A. M., & Bryman, A. (2004). Handbook on data analysis. London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinss, U., Larmie, S. A. & Strauss, M. (1998). Solids separation and pond systems for the treatment of faecal sludges in the tropics. In Sandec report no. 05/98. Eawag/Sandec, Dubendorf/Accra.

  • Klingel, F., Montangero, A., Kone, D., & Strauss, M. (2002). Fecal sludge management in developing countries: A planning manual, 1st Edition, April 2002. Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (Eawag), Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries (Sandec), Switzerland.

  • Kone, D., Strauss, M., & Saywell, D. (2007). Towards an improved faecal sludge management. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium and Workshop on Faecal sludge Management Policy, Dakar, Senegal.

  • Ludwig, H. F., & Mohit, K. (2000). Appropriate technology for municipal sewerage/excreta management in developing countries: Thailand case study. The Environmentalist, 20, 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthi, C., Panesar, A., Schutze, T., Norstrom, A., McConville, J., Parkinson, J., et al. (2011). Sustainable sanitation in cities: A framework for action. Rijswijk, Netherlands: Published by Papiroz Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbeguere, M., Gning, J. B., Dodane, P. H., & Kone, D. (2010). Socio-economic profile and profitability of faecal sludge emptying companies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 1288–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOPH. (2008). Factsheet on environmental health: Managing night soil in Subdistricts. Thailand (in Thai): Report of the Ministry of Public Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCS. (2003). Municipality Act (Vol. 12, B.E.2546). Report of the Office of the Council of State, Thailand.

  • Omran, A. (2011). Factors influencing water treatment management performance in Malaysia: A case study in Pulau Pinang. International Journal of Engineering, 6, 53–62.

  • Robbins, M.D. (2007). Septage management guide for local governments: A step-by-step practical guide to developing effective Septage Management programs for cities and municipalities.

  • Schmoll, O., Howard, G., Chilton, J., & Chorus, I. (2006). Protecting groundwater for health: Managing the quality of drinking-water sources. London: Report of the World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strande, L., Ronteltap, M., & Brdjanovic, D. (2014). Faecal sludge management. London: IWA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-HABITAT. (2011). Status and strategy for faecal sludge management in the Kathmandu Valley. Nepal: HPCIDBC Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF/WHO. (2012). Progress on drinking water and sanitation. 2012 Update. UNICEF/WHO joint monitoring program for Water Supply and Sanitation. http://www.unicef.org/media/files/JMPreport2012.pdf.

  • USAID. (2010). A rapid assessment of Septage Management in Asia: Policies and practices in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vietnam. USAID.

  • World Bank Water and Sanitation Program. (2008). Economic impacts of sanitation in Vietnam. Research Report.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North–South: Research Partnerships for User Driven Sanitation, co-funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and the participating institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achara Taweesan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taweesan, A., Koottatep, T. & Dongo, K. Factors influencing the performance of faecal sludge management services: case study in Thailand municipalities. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 125–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9719-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9719-x

Keywords

Navigation