Abstract
This paper aimed to analyze short-term changes in landscape pattern that primarily results from building development in the east coast of Mersin Province (Turkey). Three sites were selected. Ikonos (2003) and Quickbird (2009) images for these sites were classified, and land cover transformations were quantitatively analyzed using cross-tabulation of classification results. Changes in landscape structure were assessed by comparing the calculated values of area/edge and shape metrics for the earlier and later dates. Area/edge metrics included percentage of land and edge density, while shape metrics included perimeter-area ratio, fractal dimension, and related circumscribing circle (RCC) metrics. Orchards and buildings were dominating land cover classes. Variations in patch edge, size, and shapes were also analyzed and discussed. Degradation of prime agricultural areas due to building development and implications of such development on habitat fragmentation were highlighted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alphan, H., & Celik, N. (2014). Mapping spatial variations of land cover in a coastal landscape using pattern metrics. 3rd International Geography Symposium. Geomed 2013, 120, 23–30.
Alphan, H., Yilmaz, K. T., & Oguz, H. (2014). Monitoring Development in the Coastal Landscape of Erdemli District, Mersin: Current Urbanization Trends and Future Projections. Unpublished Technical Report, Turkish Scientific and Technological Council (TUBITAK) Grant Nr: 111Y253, 186pp (In Turkish).
Alphan, H., & Sonmez, F. (2015). Mapping availability of sea view for potential building development areas. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 187(7), doi:Artn 413 10.1007/S10661-015-4644-X.
Alphan, H. (2011). Comparing the utility of image algebra operations for characterizing landscape changes: the case of the Mediterranean coast. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2961–2971.
Anonymous (2015). CORINE Land Cover Legend. http://sia.eionet.europa.eu/CLC2006/CLC_Legeng.pdf, last accessed, April, 2015
Baker, W. L., & Cai, Y. (1992). The role programs for multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the GRASS geographical information system. Landscape Ecology, 7, 291–302.
Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1), 2–16.
Darvishi, A., Fakheran, S., & Soffianian, A. (2015). Monitoring landscape changes in Caucasian black grouse (Tetrao mlokosiewiczi) habitat in Iran during the last two decades. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment., 187(7), 443.
De Pablo, C., Roldan-Martin, M. J., & De Agar, P. M. (2012). Magnitude and significance in landscape change. Landscape Research., 37(5), 571–589.
Esbah, H., Deniz, B., Kara, B., & Kesgin, B. (2010). Analyzing landscape changes in the Bafa Lake Nature Park of Turkey using remote sensing and landscape structure metrics. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment., 165(1–4), 617–632.
Gillanders, S. N., Coops, N. C., Wulder, M. A., Gergel, S. E., & Nelson, T. (2008). Multitemporal remote sensing of landscape dynamics and pattern change: describing natural and anthropogenic trends. Progress in Physical Geography., 32, 503–528.
Gu, D., Zhang, Y., Fu, J., & Zhang, X. (2007). The landscape pattern characteristics of coastal wetlands in Jiaozhou Bay under the impact of human activities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment., 124(1–3), 361–370.
Gunlu, A., Kadiogullari, A. I., Keles, S., & Baskent, E. Z. (2009). Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to deforestation in Northeastern Turkey: a case study in Rize. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment., 148(1–4), 127–137.
Gustafson, E. (1998). Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is state of the art? Ecosystems., 1, 143–156.
Junhong, B., Hua, O., Baoshan, C., Qinggai, W., & Hui, C. (2008). Changes in landscape pattern of alpine wetlands on the Zoige Plateau in the past four decades. Acta Ecologica Sinica., 28(5), 2245–2252.
Long, J., Nelson, T., & Wulder, M. (2010). Regionalization of landscape pattern indices using multivariate cluster analysis. Environmental Management., 46(1), 134–142.
Manson, F. J., Loneragan, N. R. & Phinn, S. R. (2003). Spatial and temporal variation in distribution of mangroves in Moreton Bay, subtropical Australia: a comparison of pattern metrics and change detection analyses based on aerial photographs. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 57, 653–666.
McGarigal, K. (2014). FRAGSTATS Help (p. 182). University of Massachusetts: Amherst.
McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Neel, M.C., et al. (2002). FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps, Available at: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.)
McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Portland: Gen. Tech. Report PNW-GTR-351, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Wagner, H. H., & Fortin, M. J. (2005). Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology., 86(8), 1975–1987.
Wang, S., & Wang, S. (2013). Land use/land cover change and their effects on landscape patterns in the Yanqi Basin, Xinjiang (China). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment., 185(12), 9729–9742.
Wu, J. G. (2000). Landscape: pattern, proceed, scale and hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Wu, J. G. (2004). Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecology, 19(2), 125–138.
Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Li, F., & Cropp, R. (2006). Vector analysis theory on landscape pattern (VATLP). Ecological Modelling, 193, 492–502.
Acknowledgments
This project is supported by Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council (TUBITAK) and Cukurova University Department of Research Projects under the grant numbers CAYDAG 111Y253 and ZF2012YL35, respectively.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alphan, H., Çelik, N. Monitoring changes in landscape pattern: use of Ikonos and Quickbird images. Environ Monit Assess 188, 81 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5089-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5089-y