Skip to main content
Log in

Wind tunnel study of turbulent flow past an urban canyon model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling dispersion in urban area requires appropriate input parameters, in particular aerodynamic roughness parameters. A low-speed wind tunnel was deployed to study flow patterns over an urban canyon model with three aspect ratios and three flow speeds of 2, 5, and 10 m/s with the objective of obtaining these parameters. Flow speed, standard deviation, and turbulence intensity profiles were determined with a single directional hot-wire anemometer at several positions across the urban canyon model. The aerodynamic parameters \(u_*\), \(z_0\), and \(d_0\) were obtained from flow speed profile via a non-linear fit after a suitable choice of the initial value of \(d_0\) for which all aerodynamic parameters converge. Flow speed and standard deviation profiles do not change significantly with the position across the canyon, but are much affected by the free flow speed. The regular way they respond to the free flow speed suggested a normalization for which all profiles collapse onto a single profile, which depends only on the canyon aspect ratio. The normalization criterion revealed to be important for obtaining convergent dimensionless profiles. To describe the general profiles characteristics a simple new parameterization is proposed, in which a single-valued function (Gaussian curve) describing the flow speed profile is used in a flux-gradient relationship for describing the standard deviation profiles. This parameterization works well down to \(z/h \sim \) 0.25 –0.50.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arya SP (1999) Air pollution meteorology and dispersion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avelar AC, Banhara JR, Fico NR Jr, Andrade CR, Zaparoli EL (2009) Experimental and numerical investigation of roughness and three-dimensional effects on the flow over shallow cavities. In 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 22–25 June 2009, San Antonio

  3. Baik JJ, Park RS, Chun HY, Kim JJ (2000) A laboratory model of urban street-canyon flows. J Appl Meteorol 39:1592–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barlow JF, Harman IN, Belcher SE (2004) Scalar fluxes from urban street canyons. Part I: Laboratory simulation. Bound Layer Meteorol 113:369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Britter RE, Hanna SR (2003) Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:469–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng H, Hayden P, Robins AG, Castro IP (2007) Flow over cube arrays of different packing densities. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:715–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gowardhan AA, Pardyjak ER, Senocak I, Brown MJ (2012) A CFD-based wind solver for an urban fast response transport and dispersion model. Environ Fluid Mech 11:439–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harman IN, Finnigan JJ (2007) A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Bound Layer Meteorol 123:339–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jorgensen FE (1971) Directional sensitivity of wire and fibre-film probes. DISA Inf 11:31–37

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jorgensen FE (2002) How to measure turbulence with hot-wire anemometers—a practical guide. Dantec Dynamics publication, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kastner-Klein P, Plate EJ (1999) Wind-tunnel study of concentration fields in street canyons. Atmos Environ 33:3973–3979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kastner-Klein P, Fedorovich E, Rotach MW (2001) A wind tunnel study of organized and turbulent air motions in urban street canyons. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 89:849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan MI, Simons RR, Grass AJ (2006) Influence of cavity flow regimes on turbulence diffusion coefficient. J Vis 9:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Macdonald RW (2000) Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer. Bound Layer Meteorol 97:25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marciotto ER, Oliveira AP, Hanna SR (2010) Modeling study of the aspect ratio influence on urban canopy energy fluxes with a modified wall-canyon energy budget scheme. Build Environ 45:2497–2505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mellor GL, Yamada T (1974) A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 31:1791–1806. (Corrigenda, J Atmos Sci 34:1482, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mellor GL, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys Space Phys 20:851–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Monin AS, Yaglom AM (1971) Statistical fluid mechanics, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nieuwstadt FTM, Duynkerke PG (1996) Turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer. Atmos Res 40:111–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oleson KW, Bonan GB, Feddema J, Vertenstein M, Grimmond CSB (2008) An urban parameterization for a global climate model. Part I: formulation and evaluation for two cities. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:1038–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pavageau M, Schatzmann M (1999) Wind tunnel measurements of concentration fluctuations in an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ 33:3961–3971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearlmutter D, Berlinera P, Shavivb E (2006) Physical modeling of pedestrian energy exchange within the urban canopy. Build Environ 41:783–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pournazeri S, Princevac M, Venkatram A (2012) Scaling of urban plume rise and dispersion in water channels and wind tunnels—revisit of an old problem. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 103:16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Princevac M, Baik JJ, Li X, Park SB, Pan H (2010) Lateral channeling within rectangular arrays of cubical obstacles. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 98:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raupach MR, Antonia RA, Rajagopalan S (1991) Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. Appl Mech Rev 44:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ricciardelli F, Polimeno S (2006) Some characteristics of the wind flow in the lower urban boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 94:815–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2006) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ana C. Avelar from the Aerodynamics Division for the wind-tunnel arrangements, Ana C. D. Barbosa and José R. Banhara for helping with the experimental setup and measurements, Luiz E. Medeiros and Amaury Caruzzo for reading the manuscript, and the reviewers for helpful comments. The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) under Grant number 2010/16510-0 and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) under Grants Universal 471143/2011-1, PQ 303720/2010-7, and 559949/2010-3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edson R. Marciotto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marciotto, E.R., Fisch, G. Wind tunnel study of turbulent flow past an urban canyon model. Environ Fluid Mech 13, 403–416 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9268-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9268-5

Keywords

Navigation