Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Exploratory Talk to Abstract Reasoning: a Case for Far Transfer?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has shown improvements in science, mathematics, and language scores when classroom discussion is employed in school-level science and mathematics classes. Studies have also shown statistically and practically significant gains in children’s reasoning abilities as measured by the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices test when employing the practice of “exploratory talk”. While these studies suggest that transfer of learning had taken place, a number of dialog-intensive designs have failed to find positive results, only reported delayed transfer, or have been criticized in terms of methodological rigor, small sample sizes, or because they have only shown small effect sizes. In this study, the claim is made that a particular set of studies which focused on exploratory talk and reasoning abilities, and which used designs that are better positioned to meet the standards mentioned above when presenting data in support of far transfer, provides robust evidence of far transfer within the framework of Barnett and Ceci’s taxonomy of transfer. Possible relationships between exploratory talk, argumentation, and key domains in the science of learning are considered in an attempt to explain the apparent far transfer effects when children engage in exploratory talk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P. (2001). Cognitive acceleration: thinking as intelligence. Teaching Thinking, 5, 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S., & Ceci, S. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschmans, S.-A. (2013). Teaching pharmacology: issues of language and learning in a multilingual classroom setting. Unpublished PhD. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth.

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. London: Harvard University Press.

  • Chinn, C., & Anderson, R. (1998). The structure of discussions that promote reasoning. Teachers College Record, 100, 315–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (2010). What’s culture got to do with it?: Educational research as a necessarily interdisciplinary enterprise. Educational Researcher, 39, 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2014). The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortes, M. (1970). Social and psychological aspects of education in taleland. In M. Fortes (Ed.), Time and social structure (pp. 201–239). New York: Humanities Press (Original work published 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T. L., Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., Hambrick, D. Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0956797613492984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewins, N. P. (1914). The doctrine of formal discipline in the light of experimental investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(3), 168–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0070498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, S., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(15), 6829–6833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, K.-J., Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2013). On the nature and nurture of intelligence and specific cognitive abilities: the more heritable, the more culture-dependent. Psychological Science, 24(10), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackermain, Beier & Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (1997). Psychological testing: principles, applications and issues. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, M., Zeitz, C., & Resnick, L. (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 53–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22, 545–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, M., McGreggor, K., & Goel, A. (2009). Addressing the Raven’s progressive matrices test of general intelligence. AAAI Fall Symposium on Multi Representational Architectures for Human Level Intelligence, Washington, DC.

  • Locke, A., Ginsberg, J., & Peers, I. (2002). Development and disadvantage: implications for the early years and beyond. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., Allik, J., Pullmann, H., & Laidra, K. (2004). Sex differences on the progressive matrices among adolescents: some data from Estonia. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1249–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: a sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M. (2002). Accountable talk: classroom conversation that works. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 62, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, F. (2005). ‘Don’t think in your head, think aloud’: ICT and exploratory talk in the primary school mathematics classroom. Research in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morehouse, R., & Williams, M. (1998). Report on student use of argument skills. Critical and Creative Thinking, 6(1), 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, S.T. (2014). Applying psychological science to higher education: key findings and open questions. Retrieved from http://hilt.harvard.edu/hilt-publications on June 18.

  • Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., Franklin, M. S., Chin, J. M., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). The role of mind-wandering in measurements of general aptitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 788–798. doi:10.1037/a0027968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, M. S., Phillips, D. T., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Mindfulness training improves memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science, 24, 776–781. doi:10.1177/0956797612459659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, E. M., & Asterhan, C. S. (2016). The psychology of far transfer from classroom argumentation. In F. Paglieri (Ed.), The psychology of argument: cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion. London: College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Suss, H.-M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence—their correlation and relation: comment on Ackerman, Beier, & Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., Court, J. & Raven, J. C. (1995). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

  • Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2003). Manual for Raven’s standard progressive matrices and vocabulary scales: section 1 general overview. San Antonio, Texas: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M., & Engle, R. W. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. C., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. (2015). Introduction: talk, learning, and teaching. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 1–12). Washington, DC: AERA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., et al. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznitskaya, A., Glina, M., Carolan, B., Michaud, O., Rogers, J., & Sequeira, L. (2012). Examining transfer effects from dialogic discussions to new tasks and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 288–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. (1991). Reasoning with raven in and out of context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61 (2), 129–138.

  • Roediger, H. L. (2013). Applying cognitive psychology to education: translational educational science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2004). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepeng, P. (2011). Grade nine second-language learners in township schools: issues of language and mathematics when solving word problems. Unpublished PhD. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

  • Shayer, M., & Adey, P. (2002). Learning intelligence: cognitive acceleration across the curriculum from 5 to 15 years. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singley, M., & Anderson, J. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill (Cognitive science series). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013a). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 6313–6317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szpunar, K. K., Moulton, S. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2013b). Mind wandering and education: from the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taatgen, N. A. (2013). The nature and transfer of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 120(3), 439–471.

  • Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trickey, S., & Topping, K. (2004). Philosophy for children: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva, M. G. (2010). Integrated teaching strategies model for improved scientific literacy in second-language learners. Unpublished PhD. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V Wertsch (Ed.), The Concepts of Activity in Soviet Psychology. New York: Sharpe.

  • Webb, P. (2003). Initiating classroom discussion in science classrooms: practical work, conversational texts and prompt posters. Unpublished PhD. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.

  • Webb, L. (2010a). Searching for common ground: developing mathematical reasoning through dialogue. Unpublished PhD. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

  • Webb, P. (2010b). Science education and literacy: imperatives for the developed and developing world. Science, 328(5977), 448–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P., & Treagust, D. (2006). Using exploratory talk to enhance problem-solving and reasoning skills in grade-7 science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9, 493–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R., Perez, J., Rojas-Drummond, S., Mercer, N., & Velez, M. (2005). Thinking together in the UK and Mexico: transfer of an educational innovation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind. New York: Harvester.

  • Wilkinson, I. A. G., Murphy, P. K., & Binici, S. (2015). Dialogue-intensive pedagogies for promoting reading comprehension: what we know, what we need to know. In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 1–12) (pp. 35–48). Washington, DC: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was kindly funded in part by incentive funding (UID 85590) from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa

    Paul Webb

  2. Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA

    J. W. Whitlow Jr

  3. Unit for Statistical Consultation, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa

    Danie Venter

Authors
  1. Paul Webb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. W. Whitlow Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Danie Venter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Webb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Webb, P., Whitlow, J.W. & Venter, D. From Exploratory Talk to Abstract Reasoning: a Case for Far Transfer?. Educ Psychol Rev 29, 565–581 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9369-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9369-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation