Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Stem Cell Treatment on Acute Liver Failure Model Using Scaffold

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Injecting MSCs via blood vessel is most commonly used method, which has a major drawback of safety. The aim of our study was to evaluate efficacy using scaffold-loaded MSCs in acute liver failure model.

Method

Acute liver failure was induced in mice using thioacetamide (TAA) (200 mg/kg, i.p) once a day for two consecutive days. The animals were divided in four acute liver failure groups: (1) TAA; (2) empty scaffold; (3) MSCs injected through tail vein; (4) MSC + Scaffold, scaffold loaded with MSCs, to evaluate the mortality and changes in liver function. Polylactic-co-glycolic acid scaffold alone and loaded with human MSCs was implanted on mice dorsum.

Results

TAA dose was titrated until one-third mortality rate was achieved. TAA (200 mg/kg) once daily for two consecutive days was injected to establish the acute liver failure model. The mortality of TAA and scaffold groups was 55.9% and 63.2%, respectively. Although, mortality of MSC-TV group decreased 14.7% as compared to TAA group (p = 0.200), MSC + Scaffold group had the lowest mortality (31.4%) (p = 0.013). Cells implanted in PLGA biomaterial were survived until 3 weeks, and their function was increased. Area of hepatic inflammation and necrosis was significantly reduced in MSC-TV and MSC + Scaffold groups; but there was no difference between the two groups. Gene expressions related to inflammation were significantly decreased in MSC-TV and MSC + Scaffold groups compared to TAA group. In MSC + Scaffold group, no migration of stem cells to liver tissue was observed. Although, not all cells in scaffold were stained, some of them were differentiated into hepatocyte-like cells which stained positive for PAS and CYP2E1 antibody.

Conclusion

Scaffold loaded with MSCs showed protective effects via paracrine signaling on acute liver failure model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALB:

Albumin

ALF:

Acute liver failure

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

FGF:

Fibroblast growth factor

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

HGF:

Hepatocyte growth factor

INR:

International normalized ratio

MELD:

Model for end-stage liver disease

MSC:

Mesenchymal stem cell

PLGA:

Polylactic-co-glycolic acid

PT:

Prothrombin time

TAA:

Thioacetamide

TBIL:

Total bilirubin

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

MCP:

Monocyte chemoattractant protein

NLRP:

NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein

ASC:

Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing carboxy-terminal CARD

References

  1. Mark AL, Sun Z, Warren DS, et al. Stem cell mobilization is life saving in an animal model of acute liver failure. Ann Surg. 2010;252:591–596.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ren X, Hogaboam C, Carpenter A, Colletti L. Stem cell factor restores hepatocyte proliferation in IL-6 knockout mice following 70% hepatectomy. J Clin Investig. 2003;112:1407–1418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan AA, Parveen N, Mahaboob VS, et al. Safety and efficacy of autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation through hepatic artery for the treatment of chronic liver failure: a preliminary study. Transplant Proc. 2012;2008:1140–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Takami T, Terai S, Sakaida I. Stem cell therapy in chronic liver disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28:203–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kharaziha P, Hellstrom PM, Noorinayer B, et al. Improvement of liver function in liver cirrhosis patients after autologous mesenchymal stem cell injection: a phase I–II clinical trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:1199–1205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suk KT, Yoon JH, Kim MY, et al. Transplantation with autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for alcoholic cirrhosis: phase 2 trial. Hepatology. 2016;64:2185–2197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jang YO, Kim YJ, Baik SK, et al. Histological improvement following administration of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for alcoholic cirrhosis: a pilot study. Liver Int. 2014;34:33–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xue R, Meng QH, Dong JL, et al. Clinical performance of stem cell therapy in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Transl Med. 2018;16:126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim G, Eom YW, Baik SK, et al. Therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells for patients with chronic liver diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30:1405–1415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng L, Xie DY, Lin BL, et al. Autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in liver failure patients caused by hepatitis b: short-term and long-term outcomes. Hepatology. 2011;54:820–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jung Y, Bauer G, Nolta JA. Concise review: Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells: progress toward safe clinical products. Stem Cells. 2012;30:42–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gnecchi M, Zhang Z, Ni A, Dzau VJ. Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy. Circ Res. 2008;103:1204–1219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang YL, Zhao Q, Qin X, et al. Paracrine action enhances the effects of autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on vascular regeneration in rat model of myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:229–236. (discussion 236–237).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ratajczak MZ, Kucia M, Jadczyk T, et al. Pivotal role of paracrine effects in stem cell therapies in regenerative medicine: can we translate stem cell-secreted paracrine factors and microvesicles into better therapeutic strategies? Leukemia. 2012;26:1166–1173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Timmers L, Lim SK, Arslan F, et al. Reduction of myocardial infarct size by human mesenchymal stem cell conditioned medium. Stem Cell Res. 2007;1:129–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Timmers L, Lim SK, Hoefer IE, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium improves cardiac function following myocardial infarction. Stem Cell Res. 2011;6:206–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walter MN, Wright KT, Fuller HR, MacNeil S, Johnson WE. Mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium accelerates skin wound healing: an in vitro study of fibroblast and keratinocyte scratch assays. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:1271–1281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4353–4364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vats A, Tolley NS, Polak JM, Gough JE. Scaffolds and biomaterials for tissue engineering: a review of clinical applications. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003;28:165–172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shoichet MS. Polymer scaffolds for biomaterials applications. Macromolecules. 2010;43:581–591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shimizu T, Yamato M, Kikuchi A, Okano T. Cell sheet engineering for myocardial tissue reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2309–2316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Godier-Furnemont AF, Martens TP, Koeckert MS, et al. Composite scaffold provides a cell delivery platform for cardiovascular repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:7974–7979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dvir-Ginzberg M, Gamlieli-Bonshtein I, Agbaria R, Cohen S. Liver tissue engineering within alginate scaffolds: effects of cell-seeding density on hepatocyte viability, morphology, and function. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:757–766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang SC, Chen L, Liu T, et al. Human umbilical cord matrix stem cells efficiently rescue acute liver failure through paracrine effects rather than hepatic differentiation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:1352–1364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Subramanian A, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S. Development of biomaterial scaffold for nerve tissue engineering: biomaterial mediated neural regeneration. J Biomed Sci. 2009;16:108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooke MJ, Vulic K, Shoichet MS. Design of biomaterials to enhance stem cell survival when transplanted into the damaged central nervous system. Soft Matter. 2010;6:4988–4998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li XW, Katsanevakis E, Liu XY, Zhang N, Wen XJ. Engineering neural stem cell fates with hydrogel design for central nervous system regeneration. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:1105–1129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sahab Negah S, Khaksar Z, Aligholi H, et al. Enhancement of neural stem cell survival, proliferation, migration, and differentiation in a novel self-assembly peptide nanofibber scaffold. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;54:8050–8062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li X, Tzeng SY, Liu X, et al. Nanoparticle-mediated transcriptional modification enhances neuronal differentiation of human neural stem cells following transplantation in rat brain. Biomaterials. 2016;84:157–166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Levenberg S, Huang NF, Lavik E, Rogers AB, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Langer R. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on three-dimensional polymer scaffolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:12741–12746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li N, Zhang Q, Gao S, et al. Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Qi CX, Yan XJ, Huang CY, Melerzanov A, Du YA. Biomaterials as carrier, barrier and reactor for cell-based regenerative medicine. Protein Cell. 2015;6:638–653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kyriakides TR, Zhu YH, Yang Z, Huynh G, Bornstein P. Altered extracellular matrix remodeling and angiogenesis in sponge granulomas of thrombospondin 2-null mice. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:1255–1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wintermantel E, Cima L, Schloo B, Langer R. Angiopolarity of cell carriers: directional angiogenesis in resorbable liver cell transplantation devices. EXS. 1992;61:331–334.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cheung HY, Lau KT, Lu TP, Hui D. A critical review on polymer-based bio-engineered materials for scaffold development. Compos Part B Eng. 2007;38:291–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4337–4351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Semino CE, Merok JR, Crane GG, Panagiotakos G, Zhang S. Functional differentiation of hepatocyte-like spheroid structures from putative liver progenitor cells in three-dimensional peptide scaffolds. Differentiation. 2003;71:262–270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li J, Tao R, Wu W, et al. 3D PLGA scaffolds improve differentiation and function of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:1427–1436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kazemnejad S, Allameh A, Soleimani M, et al. Biochemical and molecular characterization of hepatocyte-like cells derived from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on a novel three-dimensional biocompatible nanofibrous scaffold. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:278–287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schinkothe T, Bloch W, Schmidt A. In vitro secreting profile of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2008;17:199–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ohnishi S, Sumiyoshi H, Kitamura S, Nagaya N. Mesenchymal stem cells attenuate cardiac fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis through paracrine actions. Febs Lett. 2007;581:3961–3966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A1A02061717).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DWJ and JHL contributed to study design and grant; JSL, HTK, and YJC did animal care and analyzed the data; HTK wrote the manuscript, WKS assisted with English language use; and KJ interpreted histological finding.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dae Won Jun or Kiseok Jang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Guarantor of the article

Dae Won Jun.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10620_2018_5363_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Figure 1. Mesenchymal stem cells (5x105) were stained for flow cytometry and analyzed using FACS CANTO II (Becton–Dickinson & Co., San Jose, CA) using CD73, CD90, CD105 antibody as stem cell surface marker. (A) Co-stain with CD90 and CD105 antibody, 99.9% of stem cells were positively expressed. (B) Co-stain with CD73 and CD90 antibody, 99.9% of stem cells were positively expressed. (C) Co-stain with CD73 and CD105 antibody, 100% of stem cells were positively expressed. (TIFF 2865 kb)

10620_2018_5363_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary Figure 2. AST and ALT levels of each groups. At first, all groups had high level of AST and ALT and as time goes on to the third day, AST and ALT level were naturally decreased but they were more decreased in MSC + Scaffold group compared to control group. AST and ALT data were given as the mean ± SEM with one-way ANOVA test with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test by GraphPad Prism7 (p = 0.01 to 0.05: *, p = 0.001 to 0.01: **, p = 0.0001 to 0.001: ***, p < 0.0001: ****) (TIFF 1814 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, H.T., Jun, D.W., Jang, K. et al. Effect of Stem Cell Treatment on Acute Liver Failure Model Using Scaffold. Dig Dis Sci 64, 781–791 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5363-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5363-2

Keywords

Navigation